Abstract
It is the purpose of this paper to arrive at the thesis that the operation with legal norms all too often indulges in a kind of thinking which includes the risk of what we may call the paralogism of the neglected sequence. Many controversial, and even untenable, attitudes denote a failure of reasoning which is to be accounted for. Both the danger of the paralogism, and the paralogism itself if at all real would seem to be particularly visible in civil law by reason of its being centered on the concept “norm”, a circumstance which is accompanied by a paramount attention to concepts.The common law would seem to be affected also, but only in the measure it goes beyond the attention to precedents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Cervera, A. (1984). An Ubiquitous Paralogism in Legal Thinking. In: Peczenik, A., Lindahl, L., Roermund, B.V. (eds) Theory of Legal Science. Synthese Library, vol 176. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6481-5_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6481-5_32
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6483-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6481-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive