Skip to main content

Paradigms of Justifying Legal Decisions

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 176))

Abstract

In contemporary language the term “legal decision” has many meanings. The core meaning seems to be that a decision is legal if it has some legal consequences and, therefore, is made by an authorized or competent agency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cf. J.Wróblewski, Wartości a decyzja sadowa/Values and Judicial Decision/, Ossolineum 1973, chapt.III- IX.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. in general Rationality To-Day. La rationalité aujourdhui ed. Th.F.Geraets, Ottawa 1979. The relation of rationality and justifiability is, however, controversial: cf. A.Peczenik, The Basis of Legal Justification, Lund 1983, chapt.4; A.Aarnio, R.Alexy, A.Peczenik, “The Foundation of Legal Reasoning”, Rechtstheorie 12, 1981, part.II.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.Wróblewski, Meaning and Truth in Judicial Decision, Helsinki, 1983, p.49–70. The internal justification is, in A.Peczenik’s terminology, a “contextually sufficient legal justification” whereas the external justification is either a contextually sufficient or a “deep justification” depending on the way of justifying the premisses. Cf. A.Peczenik, The Basis, p. l.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. J. Wróblewski, “Verification and Justification in the Legal Sciences”, Rechtstheorie, Beiheft 1, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. J.Wróblewski, Sadowe stosowanie prawa(Judicial Application of Law), Warszawa 1972, chapt. III.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E.G. Ch.Perelman, Le champ de l’argumentation, Bruxelles 1970, p.203; Idem, “Justice and Justification”, in: Natural Law Forum 10, 1965, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cf.J.Wróblewski, “Legal Syllogism and Rationality of Judicial Decision-Making”, Rechtstheorie 1, 1974; Idem, Sadowe… chapt. X/8/; M.Taruffo, La motivazione della sentenza civile, Padova 1975, chapt. IV/1/.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. E.Bulygin, “Time and Validity”, Deontic Logic, Computational Linguistics and Legal Information Systems, vol.11, ed. A.A.Martino, North-Holland 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cf.J.Wróblewski, “Three Concepts of Validity of Law”, Tidskrift, utgiven av Juridiska Föreningen i Finland 5–6, 1982 and lit. cit.; Idem, Sadowe…chapt.X/2/.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.Wróblewski, “Fuzziness of Legal System”, Essays in Legal Theory in Honor of Kaarle Makkonen, XVI Oikeustiede Jurisprudentia 1983, Vammala 1983, p.319–322.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cf. H.L.A.Hart, The Concept of Law, Oxford 1961, chapt.V/3/VI/l.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.Wréblewski, “Operative Models and Legal Systems”, Artifical Intelligence and Legal Information Systems, vol.1, ed. C.Ciampi, Amsterdam 1982, p. 220–229.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cf.J.Wróblewski, “La preuve juridique; axiologie, logique et argumentation”, La preuve en droit, ed. Ch.Perelman and B.Foriers, Bruxelles 1981, p.338–354. M.Taruffo, La motivazione…chapt.6; G.A.Micheli and M.Taruffo, “L’administration de la preuve en droit judiciaire”, Towards Justice with a Human Face, Ghent 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.Wróblewski, “Motivation de la décision judiciaire” La motivation des decisions de justice, ed. Ch.Perelman and P.Foriers, Bruxelles 1978, p. 122–130.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cf.M.Taruffo, “La motivazione delle decisioni dei giudici”(in):Lo statuto dei lavoratori: prassi sindacali e motivazioni dei giudici ed. T.Treu, Bologna, 1977; J.Wróblewski, Meaning…p.157–179; Idem, La motivation,.. p.129 sq.; cf. note 30.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cf.J.Gillis-Wetter, The Styles of Appellate Judicial Opinions, Leyden 1960

    Google Scholar 

  17. G.Gorla, Lo stile delle sentenze. Ricerca storico-comparativa e Testi commentati, Roma 1968, 2 vol., Minin, Le style des jugements, Paris 1962; K.N.Llewellyn, The Common Law

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.Wróblewski, La règle de décision dans l’application judiciaire du droit’, La règle de droit, ed. Ch.Perelman, Bruxelles 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wróblewski, J. (1984). Paradigms of Justifying Legal Decisions. In: Peczenik, A., Lindahl, L., Roermund, B.V. (eds) Theory of Legal Science. Synthese Library, vol 176. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6481-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6481-5_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6483-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6481-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics