Skip to main content

The Concept of ‘Fact’ in the Physical Sciences and in Law

  • Chapter
Theory of Legal Science

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 176))

  • 319 Accesses

Abstract

A comparative examination of the concept of ‘fact’ as used in legal theory as a discipline lying in the sphere of the social sciences, on the one hand, and philosophy of science on the other, suggests that a ‘fact’ in the realm of science is not ‘harder’, more real or absolute for the purpose of epistemological enquiry. It cannot be asserted that essential differences exist between ‘facts’ in the two spheres, because the epistemological components for ascertaining what a fact is, that is, how it is known to be what it is, are fundamentally the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Yildirim, C.: 1971, Science: Its Meaning and Method Middle, East Technical University, p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Keat, R. and J. Urry: 2nd edn., 1982, Social Theory as Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, p.13.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Langer, S.K.: 1942, Philosophy in a New Key, Harvard University Press, p.10; see also A.L. Corbin: 1960, ‘Legal Analysis and Terminology’ in R.D. Henson (ed.), Landmarks of Law: Highlights of Legal Opinion, Harper & Bros., p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Langer, S.K.: 1942, Philosophy in a New Key, Harvard University Press, p.10; see also A.L. Corbin: 1960, ‘Legal Analysis and Terminology’ in R.D. Henson (ed.), Landmarks of Law: Highlights of Legal Opinion, Harper & Bros., p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paton, G.W.: 1964, (3rd edn.) D.P. Derham (ed.) A Textbook of Jurisprudence, Oxford University Press, p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kelsen, H.: 1952, Principles of International Law, Rinehart, p 265; ibid, (2nd edn.) 1962, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 388 and 393, and footnote 92, on the relative existence of facts.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kelsen, H.: 1952, Principles of International Law, Rinehart, p 265; ibid, (2nd edn.) 1962, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 388 and 393, and footnote 92, on the relative existence of facts.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cone, R.A. et al.: ‘Scientific Creativity’, Johns Hopkins Magazine, 31 (1980) pp. 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Granger, G.-G.: 1983, Formal Thought and the Sciences of Man, Reidel, p.176.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balekjian, W.H. (1984). The Concept of ‘Fact’ in the Physical Sciences and in Law. In: Peczenik, A., Lindahl, L., Roermund, B.V. (eds) Theory of Legal Science. Synthese Library, vol 176. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6481-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6481-5_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6483-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6481-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics