Skip to main content

Epistemology and Validity in Law

  • Chapter
Theory of Legal Science

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 176))

  • 311 Accesses

Abstract

The contemporary reflection on the problem of the validity of juridical norms conducts to a radical questioning of the frontier drawn by the positivist theories of law between an approach which intends to be merely descriptive and a process that tends to integrate the axiological dimension into the study of normative systems. Recent developments in both deontic logic (Bulygin, 1982) and the analysis of juridical reasoning (A.Aarnio, R.Alexy and A.Peczenik, 1981) reveal clearly the necessity to question the principle of axiological neutrality which underlies the positivist explanations of the validity in law. Our reflection tries to bring out the aporetic structure which the thesis of the principal positivist theoreticians offers with regard to the question of the validity of norms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aarnio Aulis, On truth and the acceptability of interpretative propositions in Legal Dogmatics, in Methodology und Erkenntnistheorie der juristischen Argumentation, Rechtstheorie, Beiheft 2, 1981, pp.33 et ss. (A. Aarnio, I. Niiniluoto, J. Uusitalo eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarnio Aulis, Alexy Robert, Peczenik Aleksander, The foundation of legal reasoning, Rechtstheorie, 1981, pp. 133–158; 257–279; 423–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarnio Aulis, On the validity, efficacy and acceptability of legal norms, in Philosophical perspectives in Jurisprudence, Acta Philosophica Fennica, 1983, pp. 152 et ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulygin Eugenio, Norms, normative propositions, and legal statements, in Contemporary Philosophy. A new survey, vol.3, Philosophy of Action, edited by G.Fløistad, Martinus Nijhof Publishers, The Hague, Boston, London, 1982, pp.127 et ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Greef Jan, Peut-on fonder des conventions, Revue Interdisciplinaire d’Etudes juridiques, 1980-4, pp.97 et ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer Hans Georg, L’art de comprendre, traduction française par Marianna Simon, Paris, Aubier- Montaigne, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas Jürgen, Connaissance et intérfêt, traduction française par Gérard Clemencon et Jean-Marie Brohm, Paris, Gallimard, coll. N.R.F., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas Jürgen, Raison et Légitimité, traduction française par Jean Lacoste, Paris, Payot, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare R.M., The language of morals, Oxford, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart L.A. Herbert, Scandinavian Realism,Cambridge Law Journal, 1959, pp.233 et ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart L.A.Herbert, Le concept de droit, traduction française par Michel van de Kerchove, Bruxelles, Publications des Facultés universitaires St.Louis, vol.6, 1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski Georges, Querelle de la science normative, Paris, L.G.D.J., Bibliothèque de philosophie du droit, vol.X, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen Hans, Theorie pure du droit, traduction française de la Ière édition de la “Reine Rechtslehre” par Henri Thevenaz, Neuchatel, Editions de la Baconnière, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen Hans, Théorie pure du droit, traduction française de la 2e édition de la “Reine Rechtslehre” par Ch.Eisenmann, Paris, Dalloz, collection Philosophie du droit, vol.7, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto Ilkka, Truth and Legal norms, communication in the 11th World Congress on Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Helsinki, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nino Carlos Santiago, Some confusions around Kelsen’s concept of validity, A.R.S.P., Bd LXIV/3, 1978, pp. 357 et ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz Joseph, Legal validity, A.R.S.P., 1977, pp. 339 et ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz Joseph, Kelsen’s theory of the basic norm, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 1974, pp. 94 et ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross Alf, Directives and Norms, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross Alf, Tû-Tû, Scandinavian Studies in Law, 1957, pp. 138 et ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross Alf, On Law and Justice, Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1974 reprinted.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lenoble, J. (1984). Epistemology and Validity in Law. In: Peczenik, A., Lindahl, L., Roermund, B.V. (eds) Theory of Legal Science. Synthese Library, vol 176. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6481-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6481-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6483-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6481-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics