Abstract
This paper sketches a way of describing reduction relations among theories as a special case of a more general view of the logical structure of related empirical theories. The key concepts in this view are “model element” (Sec. 1) and “inter- theoretical link” (Sec. 2). Model elements provide a formal characterization of the conceptual apparatus of individual theories. Intertheoretical links provide a unified treatment of particular, well-known intertheoretical relations such as reduction, specialization and theoritization and include, as well, other types of relations among empirical theories. The global structure of empirical science is represented as a net of linked theories (Sec. b). Central to the understanding of empirical science are interpreting links. These links provide a kind of “empirical semantics” for the mathematical apparatus associated with individual theories. Interpreting links are characterized and distinguished from reducing links (Sec. 3). The concept of an interpreting links provides us with a formal characterization of the distinction between theoretical and non-theoretical concepts, relative to a given theory and the net in which it lives (Sec. 5), as well as a formal characterization of the intended applications of a theory in a net (Sec. 7). The role of invariance principles in relation to interpreting links is described (Sec. 6). Finally, these ideas are exploited to provide an account of the way interpreting and reducing links work together (Sec. 8).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Balzer, W. and Sneed, J.D.: 1977, 1978, ‘Generalized Net Structures of Empirical Theories I and II’, Studia Logica 36 (3), 195–212; and Studia Logica 37 (2), 168–1.
Balzer, W. and Moulines, C.-U.: 1980, 0n Theoreticity’, Synthese (44) 467–494.
Balzer, W., Moulines, C.-U. and Sneed, J. D.: 1983, ‘The Structure of Empirica-l Science: Local and Global’ to appear in Proceedings: 7th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Salzburg.
Bourbaki, N. (pseud.): 1968, ‘Elements of Mathematics: Theory of Sets’, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., Chapter IV.
MacLane, S.: 1977, ‘Categories for the Working Mathematician’, Springer, New York.
Mayr, D.: 1976, 1981, ‘Investigations of the Concept of Reduction, I and II’, Erkenntnis 10, 275–294, and Erkenntnis 16, 109–129.
Pearce, D.: 1982, ‘The Structuralist Concept of Reduction’ Erkenntnis 18, 307–334
Sneed, J. D.: 1979, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, 2nd ed., Reidel, Dordrecht.
Sneed., J. D.: 1979, ‘Theoretization and Invariance Principles’, in: I.Niiniluoto and R. Toumela, The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change, (Acta Philosophical Fennlca 30), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 130–178
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sneed, J.D. (1984). Reduction, Interpretation and Invariance. In: Balzer, W., Pearce, D.A., Schmidt, HJ. (eds) Reduction in Science. Synthese Library, vol 175. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6454-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6454-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6456-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6454-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive