Skip to main content

Quantum Theory as a Factualization of Classical Theory

  • Chapter
Reduction in Science

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 175))

  • 119 Accesses

Abstract

Quantum theories of physics are based on the physical fact of the existence of the universal quantum of action, symbolized by the Planck constant h. Classical theories of physics ignore this fact. According to Bohr (1949) they are idealizations which can be unambiguously applied only in the limit where all actions involved are large compared with the quantum. This state of affairs suggests that there are some natural relationships between the two types of theories. First of all, it suggests that quantum theory is a factualization of classical theory where the counterfactual idealizing assumptions are replaced by their factualizations. Secondly, one is led to ask whether classical theory can be inferred from quantum theory and some additional, obviously counterfactual, assumptions. In other words, is classical theory a reduction of quantum theory, or, to reverse it, is quantum theory a generalization of classical theory? If this would be the case one could then argue that classical theory is in a correspondence relation to quantum theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alfsen, E.: 1971, ‘Compact Convex Sets and Boundary Integrals’, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltrametti, E. and Cassinelli, C.: 1981, ‘The Logic of Quantum Mechanics’, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N.: 1929, ‘Introductory survey’, in: Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N.: 1949, ‘Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics’, in: Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, the Library of Living Philosophers Inc., Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruer, J.: 1982, ‘The classical limit of quantum theory’, Synthese 50, 167–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugajska, K. and Bugajski, S.: 1973, ‘The lattice structure of quantum logics’, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare 19, 333–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugajski, S. and Lahti, P.: 1980, ‘Fundamental principles of quantum theory’, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 19, 499–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudder, S.: 1970, ‘Axiomatic quantum mechanics and generalized probability theory’, in: Probabilistic Methods in Applied Mathematics, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski, W.: 1977, Correspondence Principle and Growth of Science, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lahti, P.: 1980, ‘Uncertainty and complementarity in axiomatic quantum mechanics’, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 19, 789–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahti, P.: 1983, ‘On the role of projection postulate in quantum theory’, Reports on Mathematical Physics, in print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahti, P. and Bugajski, S.: 1983, ‘Fundamental principles of quantum theory II’, Turku, FTL-R51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahti, P. and Rantala, V.: 1984, ‘A Correspondence Relation between Classical and Quantum Theories,’ in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, G.: 1963, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, P.: 1978, Quantum Logic, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’onnell, R.: 1983, ‘The Wigner distribution function - 50th Birthday’, Foundations of Physics 13, 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piron, C.: 1976, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, W.A. Benjamin, Inc. Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lahti, P.J. (1984). Quantum Theory as a Factualization of Classical Theory. In: Balzer, W., Pearce, D.A., Schmidt, HJ. (eds) Reduction in Science. Synthese Library, vol 175. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6454-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6454-9_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6456-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6454-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics