Abstract
Quantum theories of physics are based on the physical fact of the existence of the universal quantum of action, symbolized by the Planck constant h. Classical theories of physics ignore this fact. According to Bohr (1949) they are idealizations which can be unambiguously applied only in the limit where all actions involved are large compared with the quantum. This state of affairs suggests that there are some natural relationships between the two types of theories. First of all, it suggests that quantum theory is a factualization of classical theory where the counterfactual idealizing assumptions are replaced by their factualizations. Secondly, one is led to ask whether classical theory can be inferred from quantum theory and some additional, obviously counterfactual, assumptions. In other words, is classical theory a reduction of quantum theory, or, to reverse it, is quantum theory a generalization of classical theory? If this would be the case one could then argue that classical theory is in a correspondence relation to quantum theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alfsen, E.: 1971, ‘Compact Convex Sets and Boundary Integrals’, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Beltrametti, E. and Cassinelli, C.: 1981, ‘The Logic of Quantum Mechanics’, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts.
Bohr, N.: 1929, ‘Introductory survey’, in: Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1934.
Bohr, N.: 1949, ‘Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics’, in: Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, the Library of Living Philosophers Inc., Evanston.
Bruer, J.: 1982, ‘The classical limit of quantum theory’, Synthese 50, 167–212.
Bugajska, K. and Bugajski, S.: 1973, ‘The lattice structure of quantum logics’, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare 19, 333–340.
Bugajski, S. and Lahti, P.: 1980, ‘Fundamental principles of quantum theory’, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 19, 499–514.
Gudder, S.: 1970, ‘Axiomatic quantum mechanics and generalized probability theory’, in: Probabilistic Methods in Applied Mathematics, Academic Press, New York.
Krajewski, W.: 1977, Correspondence Principle and Growth of Science, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland.
Lahti, P.: 1980, ‘Uncertainty and complementarity in axiomatic quantum mechanics’, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 19, 789–842.
Lahti, P.: 1983, ‘On the role of projection postulate in quantum theory’, Reports on Mathematical Physics, in print.
Lahti, P. and Bugajski, S.: 1983, ‘Fundamental principles of quantum theory II’, Turku, FTL-R51.
Lahti, P. and Rantala, V.: 1984, ‘A Correspondence Relation between Classical and Quantum Theories,’ in preparation.
Mackey, G.: 1963, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin, New York.
Mittelstaedt, P.: 1978, Quantum Logic, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland.
O’onnell, R.: 1983, ‘The Wigner distribution function - 50th Birthday’, Foundations of Physics 13, 83–92.
Piron, C.: 1976, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, W.A. Benjamin, Inc. Reading, Massachusetts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lahti, P.J. (1984). Quantum Theory as a Factualization of Classical Theory. In: Balzer, W., Pearce, D.A., Schmidt, HJ. (eds) Reduction in Science. Synthese Library, vol 175. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6454-9_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6454-9_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6456-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6454-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive