Abstract
With fossil hominids, skeletal evidence is often fragmentary. Certain regions of the skull may be missing for whole populations. Missing populations are fatal to the use of some methods but others, discussed below, can cope with this difficulty. With fossil material it is common for some populations to be represented by a single example - or at most very few. Whether it is admissible to calculate generalised (or any other) distance based on such small samples, and using a covariance matrix calculated from modern data, is noted but not otherwise discussed here. But it may be possible to evaluate generalised distances for some parts of the skull - the lower jaw or the articular region, for example. The question immediately arises as to how generalised distances between n populations, based on measurements from one region of the skull, relate to generalised distances between the same n populations based on measurements from another region of the skull. If the two sets of generalised distances seem to agree well, how should they be combined to give a joint analysis? Such questions immediately generalise to more than two skull regions, and in the following, m denotes the number of different regions. Of course problems of this kind need not relate only to fossil material. For example, it may be of general interest to investigate the stability of generalised distances based on different sets of measurements or different definitions of distance; the techniques discussed below are also appropriate in such circumstances. Of course all estimated distances are subject to sampling fluctuations and one would like to be able to compare sampling errors of distances evaluated from different regions of the skull.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Borg, I.: 1979, Some basic concepts of facet theory. In: Geometric Representations of Relational Data (ed. Lingoes). Ann Arbor: Mathesis Press.
Carroll, J.D. and Chang, J.J.: 1970, Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, pp. 283–319.
Carroll, J.D. and Chang, J.J.: 1972, IDIOSCAL (individual differences in orientation scaling). Paper presented at the Spring meeting of the Psychometric Society, Princeton, New Jersey, April 1972.
Davies, A.W.: 1978, On the asymptotic distribution of Gower’s m2 goodness-of-fit criterion in a particular case. Ann.Inst. Statist.Math., 30, pp. 71–79.
De Leeuw, J., and Pruzansky, S.: 1978, A new computational method to fit the weighted Euclidean distance model. Psychometrika, 43, pp. 479–490.
Everitt, B.S. and Gower, J.C.: 1981, Plotting the optimum positions of an array of cortical electrical phosphenes. In: Interpreting Multivariate Data (ed. Barnett). Wiley.
Genstat Manual: 1977, GENSTAT, a general statistical program. Oxford: Numerical Algorithms Group.
Gower, J.C.: 1971, Statistical methods of comparing different multivariate analyses of the same data. In: Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences (ed. Hodson, Kendall and Tauto). Edinburgh: University Press, pp. 138–149.
Gower, J.C.: 1975, Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika, 40, pp. 33–51.
Gower, J.C. and Banfield, C.F.: 1975, Goodness-of-fit criteria for hierarchical classification and their empirical distributions. In : Proceedings of the 8th International Biometric Conference (ed. Corsten and Postelnicu). Romania: Editura Academiei, pp. 347–362.
Hartigan, J.A.: 1967, Representation of similarity matrices by trees. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 62, pp. 1140–1158.
Heiser, W.J. and de Leeuw, J.: 1979, How to use SMACOF-I. A program for multidimensional scaling. Dept, of Datatheory, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Leiden, Wassenaarseweg 80, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 1–63.
Holman, E.W.: 1972, The relation between hierarchical and euclidean models for psychological distances. Psychometrika, 37, pp. 417–423.
Sibson, R.:1978, Studies in the robustness of multidimensional scaling: Procrustes statistics. J.R. Statit.Soc. (B), 40, pp. 234–238.
Takane, Y., Young, F., and de Leeuw, J.: 1977, Non-metric individual differences multidimensional scaling: an alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika, 42, pp. 7–67.
Ten Berge, J.M.F.: 1977, Orthogonal Procrustes rotation for two or or more matrices. Psychometrika, 1+2, pp. 267–276.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gower, J.C., Digby, P.G.N. (1984). Some Recent Advances in Multivariate Analysis Applied to Anthropometry. In: Van Vark, G.N., Howells, W.W. (eds) Multivariate Statistical Methods in Physical Anthropology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6357-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6357-3_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6359-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6357-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive