Abstract
In the mid-eighteenth century Dr. Johnson (quoted by D’Arcy Thompson, 1942) wrote: “The mathematicians are well acquainted with the difference between pure science, which has only to do with ideas, and the application of laws to the use of life, in which they are constrained to submit to the imperfections of matter and the influence of accident”. Two hundred years have not outdated this observation although, in specifics, both mathematical statistics and the anthropological study of populations have progressed long distances in parallel. Each has done what it was able to do, halting at times because of limits in ideas or techniques, and again moving into fresh pastures when such barriers were removed. Anthropology has, as is well known, depended more and more on mathematical statistics and on statisticians, while statisticians have, as is also well known, found human material, expecially crania, particularly suited to their purposes. Such reciprocal advance is necessary but difficult: the mathematics are now rather demanding for most untrained anthropologists and repellent to some. And statisticians do not always see biological questions with the eyes of an anthropologist.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barnard, M.M. : 1935, The secular variations of skull characters in four series of Egyptian skulls. Annals of Eugenics, 6, pp. 352–372.
Campbell, N.A.: 1978, Multivariate analysis in biological anthropology: some further considerations. Journal of Human Evolution, 7, pp. 197–203.
Cherry, Lorraine M., Susan M. Case, Joseph G. Kunkel, Jeff S. Wyles and Allan C. Wilson: 1982, Body shape metrics and organismal evolution. Evolution, 38/5, pp. 914–933.
Corruccini, Robert S.: 1974, An examination of the meaning of cranial discrete traits for human skeletal biological studies. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 40/3, pp. 425–445.
Corruccini, Robert S.: 1975, Multivariate analysis in biological anthropology: some considerations. Journal of Human Evolution, 4, pp. 1–19.
Corruccini, Robert S.: 1983, Principal components for allometric analysis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 60/4, pp. 451–453.
Fisher, R.A. : 1936b., The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7, pp. 179–188.
Fisher, R.A.: 1936a, “The Coefficient of Racial Likeness” and the future of craniometry. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 66, pp. 57–63.
Gelvin, B.V.: 1983, Effects of removing size variation in multivariate morphometrics. Abstract of paper at American Association of Physical Anthropologists. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 60/2, pp. 195–196.
Gower, J.C.: 1972, Measures of taxonomic distance and their analysis. In The Assessment of Population Affinities in Man, ed. by J.S. Weiner and J. Huizinga, ch. 1, pp. 1–24. Oxford; Clarendon Press.
Healy, M.J.R. and J.M. Tanner: 1981, Size and shape in relation to growth and form. Symposia (?) of the Zoological Society of London, no. 46, pp. 19–35.
Mahalanobis, P.C., D.N. Majumdar and C.R. Rao: 1949, Anthropometric Survey of the United Provinces, 1941. Sankhya, 9, pp. 89–324.
Oxnard, Charles E.: 1983, Multivariate statistics in physical anthropology: testing and interpretation. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie, 73/3, pp. 237–278.
Pearson, Karl: 1926, On the Coefficient of Racial Likeness. Biometrika, 18, pp.105–117.
Penrose, L.S. : 1954, Distance, shape and size. Annals of Eugenics, 18, pp. 337–343.
Rightmire, G.P.: 1979, Implications of Border Cave skeletal remains for Later Pleistocene human evolution. Current Anthropology, 20/1, pp. 23–35.
Van Vark, G.N.: 1976, A critical evaluation of the application of multivariate statistical methods to the study of human populations from their skeletal remains. Homo, 27/2, pp. 94–114.
Washburn, S.L.: 1952, The strategy of physical anthropology. In Anthropology Today, ed. by A.L. Kroeber et al., pp. 714–728. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wilson, S.R.: 1981, On comparing fossil specimens with population samples. Journal of Human Evolution, 10, pp. 207–214.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Howells, W.W. (1984). Introduction. In: Van Vark, G.N., Howells, W.W. (eds) Multivariate Statistical Methods in Physical Anthropology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6357-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6357-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6359-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6357-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive