Skip to main content

Comments on Engelhardt’s ‘Clinical Problems and the Concept of Disease’

  • Chapter
  • 189 Accesses

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 16))

Abstract

From the many intriguing and important ideas Professor Engelhardt presents in his excellent paper, I shall choose to comment on only the following four: (1) ontological and anti-ontological views on disease; (2) value-ladenness of pathology and nosology; (3) the concept of clinical problems as a substitute for the traditional concept of disease; (4) clinical medicine as an applied science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Cf. my ‘Krankheitsbegriffe und nosologische Systeme’, Metamed 1 (1977), 4–41.

    Google Scholar 

  2. In the present context, an elaborate explication of the notion of value-ladenness is not necessary. It suffices to define it as ‘viewed as beneficial od risky’. For a more comprehensive account, see my ‘Normative Systems and Medical Mataethics. Part 1: Value Kinematics, Health, and Disease’, Metamedicine 2 (1981), 75–119.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See my concept of ‘differential praxiognosis’ in my ‘Foundations of Clinical Praxiology. Part 1: The Relativity of Medical Diagnosis’ Metamedicine 2 (1981), 183–196. A more elaborate discussion of these two points may be found in my ‘Medicine as Ethics and Constructive Utopia. Part 1’ (in German), Medizin, Ethik & Philosophie 1 (1983), 1–18;.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sadegh-Zadeh, K. (1984). Comments on Engelhardt’s ‘Clinical Problems and the Concept of Disease’. In: Nordenfelt, L., Lindahl, B.I.B. (eds) Health, Disease, and Causal Explanations in Medicine. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6283-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6283-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6285-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6283-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics