Abstract
The search for ideal definitions of concepts, the earlier master of which was, perhaps, Aristotle, has always appealed to philosophers whose quest for certainty was a guiding epistemological principle. In the last half-century, following the analysis of ordinary and “natural” language, a number of philosophers have concluded that there are in fact no neat or sharp boundaries that can, without exception, be drawn between concepts like ‘disease’, ‘disability’, ‘handicap’, ‘deformity’, ‘normal’ and ‘healthy’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Note
feinstein, A.: 1967, Clinical Judgment, Robert E. Krieger Publishing, Co., Huntington, N.Y., p. 145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spicker, S.F. (1984). Comments on Nordenfelt’s ‘On the Circle of Health’. In: Nordenfelt, L., Lindahl, B.I.B. (eds) Health, Disease, and Causal Explanations in Medicine. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6283-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6283-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6285-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6283-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive