Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in the History of Modern Science ((SHMS,volume 14))

  • 747 Accesses

Abstract

It has been customary for historians investigating the background to quantum mechanics to concentrate on one or other of the particular branches of quantum physics. In some cases this approach may be vindicated by a similar specialisation on the part of physicists whose work is being discussed. But even though they may have published only within restricted areas, most physicists took their perception of the problem complex from the wider field of their reading, correspondence and conversation. And most of those involved in the actual development of quantum mechanics had already contributed important work in several distinct areas. In general, the major conceptual issues ran through all such areas, and their most obvious and widely discussed manifestations were not necessarily their most significant. The wave-particle duality, which was almost certainly the most characteristic conceptual feature of quantum theory, was most commonly discussed in the contexts of experimental X-ray physics and individual absorption and emission phenomena. This discussion reached its peak, in the years immediately before the development of the new quantum mechanics, in the context of the Compton effect, viewed by at least one historian as a turning point in physics.1 But by the time of Compton’s experiments this whole area had long been one of only secondary importance for the active development of ideas pertaining to the duality problem, and dramatic though his results were to a wider audience they had relatively little impact on the physicists whose work was to be of importance in the creation of quantum mechanics.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. A. Einstein, ‘Die Grundlagen der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie’, Ann. der Phys. 49 (1916), 769–822, translated in Lorentz, Principle of Relativity, 111–164. The best account of general relativity theory is probably still W. Pauli, ‘Relativitätstheorie’, Encykl Math. Wiss. 19 (1921), translated as Theory of Relativity (Oxford, 1958). For a recent historical account see Mehra, Einstein and Hilbert.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mie to Weyl, 26 October 1918, ETHZ 91, 674.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sommerfeld to Weyl, 3 July 1918, ETHZ 91, 751. Sommerfeld also criticised the theory, however, and his criticisms are to be found in Sommerfeld to Weyl, 7 November 1919, 11 December 1919 and 6 January 1920, ETHZ 91, 752–754.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eddington to Weyl, 18 August 1920, ETHZ 91, 523. Eddington’s first enthusiastic response was in a letter Eddington to Weyl, 16 December 1918, ETHZ 91, 522.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Einstein to Weyl, 8 March 1918, ETHZ 91, 539, including two pages of extravagant praise.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Pauli, ‘Zur Theorie der Gravitation und der Elektrizität von Hermann Weyl’, Phys. Zeit. 20 (1919), 457–467, and ‘Mehrkurperihelbewegung und Strahlenableitung in Weyl’s Gravitationstheorie’, Verh. Deut Phys. Ges. 21 (1919), 742–750.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. T. Whittaker, A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity 2, (London, 1953 ), 214–217.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Einstein to Weyl, 23 December 1916, ETHZ 91, 536.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Einstein to Weyl, 8 March 1918, in response to Weyl to Einstein, 1 March 1918, ETHZ 91, 539, 538a.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Einstein to Weyl, 8 April 1918, ETHZ 91, 540.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Einstein to Weyl, 15 April 1918, ETHZ 91, 541: “So schön Ihre Gedanke ist, muss ich doch offen sagen, dass er nach meiner Ansicht ausgeschlossen ist, dass die Theorie der Natur entspricht.” Einstein had already communicated this paper, though Weyl had meanwhile become dissatisfied with it, feeling that it did not go far enough: Weyl to Einstein, 15 April 1918, ETHZ 91, 540a.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Einstein to Weyl, 15 April 1918, ETHZ 91, 541, and see also Einstein to Besso, 20 August 1918 and 26 July 1920 in Einstein and Besso, Correspondance, 132–134, 155–158 (Items 46,52.1).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Einstein to Weyl, 19 April 1918, ETHZ 91, 543, with repercussions in Weyl to Einstein, 27 and 28 April 1918, and Einstein to Weyl, 1 May 1918, ETHZ 91, 543a, 543b, 544; Weyl, ‘Grav. u. Elek.’, 478–480, not in translation.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weyl, ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weyl, Raum-Zeit-Materie, 1st edition, 226–227, not in 4th edition or translation.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weyl to Einstein, 19 May 1918, ETHZ 91, 545a: “Weiss ich doch nur zu gut, in einem wie viel Lauteren Verhältnis Sie zur Wirchlichkeit stehen als ich.”

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pauli, Relativity, 196.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. S. Eddington, ‘Relativity of field and matter’, Phil. Mag. 42 (1921), 800–806, and ‘A generalisation of Weyl’s theory of the electromagnetic and gravitational fields’, Proc. Roy. Soc. A99 (1921), 104–122. See also A. S. Eddington, Space, Time and Gravitation (Cambridge, 1920), Chapter 11, where Weyl’s theory is enthusiastically reviewed, and Mathematical Theory of Relativity (Cambridge, 1923 ).

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Mie, ‘Grundlagen einer Theorie der Materie’, Ann. der Phys. 37 (1912), 511— 534, 39 (1912), 1–40, 40 (1913), 1–66. See Mehra, Einstein and Hilbert, Pyenson, ‘Gottingen reception’, and L. Pyenson, ‘Mathematics, education, and the Göttingen approach to physical reality, 1890–1914’, Europa 2 (1979), 91–127.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pauli, ‘Grav. u. Elek.’ and Relativity, 202, 205–206. See also A. Einstein, ‘Spielen Gravitationsfelder in Aufbau der materiellen Elementarteilchen eine wesentliche Rolle?’, S.-B. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. (1919), 348–356, translated in Lorentz, Principle of Relativity, 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eddington to Weyl, 10 July 1921, ETHZ 91, 525.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weyl to Pauli, 10 May 1919, PB, 3–5 (Item 1).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weyl, Space-Time-Matter, 311.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weyl, ‘Das Verhältnis’.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Weyl, Space-Time-Matter, 212–213, and Pauli, Relativity, 192.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pauli, ‘Grav. u. Elek.’, and Relativity, 205–206.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hendry, ‘Weimar culture’, but see also Forman, ‘Weimar culture’.

    Google Scholar 

  28. W. Schottky, ‘Das Kausalproblem der Quantentheorie als eine Grundfrage der modernen Naturforschung überhaupt’, Naturwissenschaften 9 (1921), 492–496, 506–511.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. K. Försterling, ‘Bohrsches Atommodell und Relativitätstheorie’, Zeit. Phys. 3 (1920), 404–407, reviewed by Pauli in Phys. Ber. 2 (1921), 489.

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. Schrödinger, ‘Dopplerorinzip und Bohrsche Frequenzbedingung’, Phys. Zeit. 23 (1922), 301–303.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schrödinger to Pauli, 8 November 1922, PB, 69–73 (Item 29).

    Google Scholar 

  32. E. Schrödinger, ‘Was ist ein Naturgesetz?’, Naturwissenschaften 17 (1929), 9–11, inaugural lecture at Zürich, December 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schrödinger to Pauli, 8 November 1922, PB, 69–73 (Item 29).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schrödinger, ‘Naturgesetz’.

    Google Scholar 

  35. E. Schrödinger, ‘Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem’, Ann. der Phys. 79 (1926), 489–527, esp. 489. The words were however omitted from the English translation of the paper, perhaps as unsuitable for an English audience.

    Google Scholar 

  36. E. Schrodinger, ‘Über eine bemerkenswerte Eigenschaft der Quantenbahnen eines einzelnen Elektrons’, Zeit. Phys. 12 (1922), 13–23. See also Raman and Forman, ‘Why Schrödinger’, 305.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schrödinger, ibid., and see Raman and Forman, ‘Why Schrödinger’, 303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pauli, Relativity, 206.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pauli to Eddington, 20 September 1923, PB, 115–119 (Item 45). This letter was sent in response to a copy of Eddington’s Mathematical Theory.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hendry, J. (1984). Wolfgang Pauli and the Search for a Unified Theory. In: The Creation of Quantum Mechanics and the Bohr-Pauli Dialogue. Studies in the History of Modern Science, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6277-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6277-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6279-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6277-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics