Skip to main content

Correspondence Theory

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 165))

Abstract

When possible worlds semantics arrived around 1960, one of its most charming features was the discovery of simple connections between existing intensional axioms and ordinary properties of the alternative relation among worlds. Decades of syntactic labour had produced a jungle of intensional axiomatic theories, for which a perspicuous semantic setting now became available. For instance, typical completeness theorems appeared such as the following:

A modal formula is a theorem of S4 if and only if it is true in all reflexive, transitive Kripke frames.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • The classical introduction to a systematic modal model theory remains Segerberg [1971]. Some first applications of more sophisticated tools from classical model theory may be found in Fine [1975]. The algebraic connection was developed beyond the elementary level by L. Esakia, S. K. Thomason, R. I. Goldblatt and W. J. Blok. Two good surveys are Blok [1976] and Goldblatt [1976]. The proper perspective upon modal logic as a fragment of second-order logic was given in Thomason [1975]. An early appearance of correspondence theory proper is made in Sahlqvist [1975], full surveys are found in Van Benthem [1982a] for the case of modal logic and Van Benthem [1982b] for the case of tense logic. The other case studies are still in a preliminary state, with the exception of the intuitionistic treatise Rodenburg [1982].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajtai, M.: 1979, Isomorphism and higher-order equivalence’, Ann. Math. Logic. 16, 181–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blok, W. J.: 1976, ‘Varieties of interior algebras’, dissertation, Mathematical Institute, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boolos, G.: 1979, The Unprovability of Consistency, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J. P.: 1979, ‘Logic and time’, J. Symbolic Logic 44, 566–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J. P.: 1981, ‘Quick completeness proofs for some logics of conditionals’, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 22, 76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. C. and Keisler, H. J.: 1973, Model Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, K.: 1974, ‘An incomplete logic containing S4’, Theoria 40, 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, K.: 1975, ‘Some connections between elementary and modal logic’, in S. Kanger [1975]

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D. M.: 1976, Investigations in Modal and Tense Logics, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, R.I.: 1974, ‘Semantic analysis of orthologic’, J. Philosophical Logic 3, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, R. I.: 1976, ‘Metamathematics of modal logic’, Reports on Math. Logic 6, 4–77;7,21-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, R. I.: 1979, Topoi: the Categorial Analysis of Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, R. I. and Thomason, S. K.: 1974, ‘Axiomatic classes in propositional model logic’, in J. Crossley (ed.), Algebra and Logic, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 450, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grätzer, G.: 1968, Universal Algebra, Van No strand, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, L. A.: 1950, ‘Completeness in the theory of types’, J. Symbolic Logic 15,81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, L. A., Monk, D., and Tarski, A.: 1971, Cylindric Algebras I, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humberstone, I. L.: 1979, ‘Interval semantics for tense logics’, J. Philosophical Logic 8, 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, R., Johnston, D. and Schotch, P.: 1980, ‘Universal first-order definability in modal logic’, Zeit. Math. Logik 26, 327–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanger, S. (ed.): 1975, Proceedings of the 3rd Scandinavian Logic Symposium, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozen, D.: 1979, ‘On the duality of dynamic algebras and Kripke models’, IBM, Thomas Watson Research Center, New York, Report RC 7893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1973, Counterfactuals and comparative possibility’, J. Philosophical Logic 2, 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasiowa, H. and Sikorski, R.: 1970, The Mathematics of Metamathematics, Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodenburg, P.: 1982, ‘Intuitionistic correspondence theory’, Report, Mathematical Institute, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlqvist, H.: 1975, ‘Completeness and correspondence in the first-and second-order semantics for modal logic’, in Kanger [ 1975].

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerberg, K.: 1971, ‘An essay in classical modal logic’, Filosoflska Studier 13, Department of Philosophy, University of Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoryński, C. S.: 1973, ‘Applications of Kripke models’, in A. S. Troelstra (éd.), Meta-mathematical Investigations of Intuitionistic Arithmetic and Analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 344, 329–391, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, S. K.: 1972, ‘Semantic analysis of tense logics’, J. Symbolic Logic 37, 150–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, S. K.: 1974, ‘An incompleteness theorem in modal logic’, Theoria 40, 30–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, S. K.: 1975, ‘Reduction of second-order logic to modal logic I’, Zeit. Math. Logik 21,107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Benthem, J. F. A. K.: 1976, ‘Modal correspondence theory’, dissertation, Instituut voor Grondslagenonderzoek, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Benthem, J. F. A. K.: 1978, ‘Two simple incomplete modal logics’, Theoria 44, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Benthem, J. F. A. K.: 1979a, ‘Canonical modal logics and ultrafilter extensions’, J. Symbolic Logic 44, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Benthem, J. F. A. K.: 1979b, ‘Syntactic aspects of modal incompleteness theorems’, Theoria 45, 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Benthem, J. F. A. K.: 1980, ‘Some kinds of modal completeness’, Studia Logica 39, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Benthem, J. F. A. K.: 1981a, ‘Intuitionistic Definability’, manuscript, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Benthem, J. F. A. K.: 1981b, ‘Possible worlds semantics for classical logic’, Report ZW 8018, Mathematical Institute, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Benthem, J. F. A. K.: 1982a, Modal Logic and Classical Logic, Bibliopolis, Naples.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Benthem, J. F. A. K.: 1982b, The Logic of Time, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. J.: 1981, ‘Modal-tense logic incompleteness and the Master Argument’, manuscript, University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnie, J. A.: 1977, ‘The causal theory of space-time’, in J. S. Earman et al. (eds), Foundations of Space-Time Theories, University of Minnesota Press, 134–205.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Benthem, J. (1984). Correspondence Theory. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds) Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Synthese Library, vol 165. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6259-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6259-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6261-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6259-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics