Skip to main content

Meaning as a Complex of Relationships

  • Chapter
Dialectical Theory of Meaning

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 81))

  • 117 Accesses

Abstract

Confronted with the task of defining the meaning of the very term ‘meaning’ our first impression is that we have embarked upon a circular path and that in the end we must arrive at contradictions similar to Russell’s antimonies with classes which are an element of themselves or with predicates that themselves have the property they designate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Along these lines Broad wrote in 1914: “Strictly speaking a thing has meaning when direct acquaintance with it or knowledge of it permits us to infer or by association to think of something else”. (Broad, Perception, Physics and Reality, 1914, p. 97.)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. Ogden and Richards, The Meaning of Meaning, London, 1923, Appendix C, pp. 435–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Russell, Preface to the Second Edition of The Principles of Mathematics, London, 1938, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Russell, The Problems of Philosophy, London, 1912, p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Russell, ‘The Meaning of Meaning,’ Mind, 1920, p. 401.

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Laird, A Story of Realism, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbert Ryle, ‘The Theory of Meaning’, British Philosophy in the Mid-Century, London, 1957, p. 245.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See W. B. Gallie, Peirce and Pragmatism, Harmondsworth, 1952, p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  9. On several occasions Peirce attempted to subdivide his concept of interpretant into its basic components (immediate, dynamic, and final interpretant). See his letter to Lady Welby of March 14, 1909 in Ogden and Richards, The Meaning of Meaning, p. 441.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marković, M. (1984). Meaning as a Complex of Relationships. In: Dialectical Theory of Meaning. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 81. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6256-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6256-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6258-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6256-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics