Skip to main content

Ethical Problems in Science Communication

  • Chapter
Rationality in Science and Politics

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 79))

  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

Philosophers of science have traditionally been concerned with the special epistemological and methodological problems which emerge as we move from common-sense pictures of our immediate surroundings to sophisticated scientific theories of the whole universe. Thus they have asked: How is scientific experimentation different from the casual data collecting which goes on in our ordinary day-to-day existence? How, if at all, is it possible to get knowledge about unobservable entities and processes? Are scientific explanations different in kind from common-sense accounts? Etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. An earlier version of this paper was read in the Seminar für Philosophie, Logik und Wissenschaftstheorie, Munich on July 15, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a brief but systematic discussion of the ethical dimensions of pure science see my ‘Wissenschaftsethik’, forthcoming in Handlexikons zun Wissenschaftstheorie (Ehrenwirth Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For a fair and balanced historical discussion of this very controversial topic, see Kenneth M. Ludmerer, Genetics and American Society (John Hopkins University Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gar Allen, ‘Genetics, Eugenics and Society’, Social Studies of Science 6 (1976), 105–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. The numbers used below come from Corinne Hutt, Males and Females (Penguin Books, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See W. C. Salmon, Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance (University of Pittsburgh Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. For a clear discussion of both the scientific and ethical issues, see Michael Ruse, Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense? (Reidel, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A more complete discussion can be found in my ‘Braucht die Sozialwissenschaft wirklich Metaphysik?’, in H. Albert und K. H. Stapf (eds.), Theorie und Erfahrung (Klett-Cotta, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koertge, N. (1985). Ethical Problems in Science Communication. In: Andersson, G. (eds) Rationality in Science and Politics. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 79. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6254-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6254-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1953-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6254-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics