Abstract
Historians of philosophy are a kind of go-between. It is their task to bring about a relation between two disciplines — history and philosophy. It is thus no wonder that the complaints about them have come from both sides. An example of the complaints from the side of philosophers may be found in the Preface to Kant’s Prolegomena. In his opinion, historians of philosophy tend to overemphasise the resemblances between contemporary philosophical ideas and philosophical ideas from the past. Kant’s suggestion is that by doing so they discourage philosophers. Therefore they “must wait until those who attempt to draw from the fountain of reason itself (i.e. the philosophers, F.V.) have made their case; it is then their task to tell the world what has been done”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Passmore, John: (1965), The idea of philosophy, in: History and Theory, The historiography of the history of philosophy, Suppl. V, pp. 1–32.
Ree, Jonathan: (1978), Philosophy and the history of philosophy, in: Ree, J., Westoby, A. and Ayers, M., Philosophy and its past, pp. 1–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vleeskens, F. (1985). Bifurcation as a Model of Description — A Means of Making the Historiography of Philosophy More Historical?. In: Hazewinkel, M., Jurkovich, R., Paelinck, J.H.P. (eds) Bifurcation Analysis. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6239-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6239-2_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6241-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6239-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive