Abstract
The present paper seeks to understand Hegel’s notion of a philosophical or ‘scientific’ psychology, these terms being synonymous for him. First the paper notes Hegelian criticisms of various approaches to psychology, whose diverse failings, Hegel often says, derive from a proceeding through “external reflection,” or the “reflective understanding.”1 External reflection, according to Hegel, is a philosophizing from the standpoint ‘outside’ the Sache selbst, and we may say that in Hegel’s view, external reflection constitutes the main obstacle toward a philosophical psychology. With regard to such a psychology, external reflection takes on an especially problematic form in post-Cartesian philosophy as a philosophizing from the subjective consciousness. For when such a philosophizing turns to consciousness itself, should not its procedure be eo ipso immanent to the Sache selbst? In fact, says Hegel, it is not; rather its procedure in dealing with the soul or mind or consciousness is but a special form of external reflection. It is this post-Cartesian form of external reflection, particularly in its most challenging embodiment in the Kantian Critical philosophy, that Hegel’s approach is designed to overcome. The attempt to elucidate the nature of the problem here forms the second part of our paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
For one statement of Hegel’s meaning of external reflection, particularly as contrasted with dialectical thinking, see L [W, 1892], p. 147.
Hegel intended to write a separate full-scale work on subjective spirit but did not live
to do so. See Friedhelm Nicolin, ‘Hegels Arbeiten zur Theorie des subjektiven Geistes’ in J. Derbolav and F. Nicolin, eds., Erkenntnis und Verantwortung. Festschrift für Theodor Litt ( Düsseldorf, Schwann, 1960 ), pp. 356–374.
Referring to Condillac’s model of the mind, Hegel says, it shows a successive emergence of mental faculties in a “solely affirmative manner” that misses the “negative aspect” whereby the sensible material is “transmuted into mind and destroyed as a sensible.”(PM p. 183).
On the question of the role of the philosopher, see Kenley R. Dove, ‘Hegel’s Pheno- menological Method’, Review of Metaphysics 23 (1970), 627 ff.
“Psychologists may not expressly speak of parts of the soul or mind, but the mode in which this subject is treated by the analytic understanding is largely founded on the analogy of this finite relation.”(L [W, 1892], p. 246; see also p. 365).
See R. C. Solomon, ‘Hegel’s Concept of “Geist” ’, Review of Metaphysics 23 (1970), 642–661.
See Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, tr. J. Ellington (Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill, 1970), p. 8; Theodore Mischel, ‘Kant and the Possibility of a Science of Psychology’ in Kant Studies Today, ed. L. W. Beck (La Salle, III., Open Court, 1969) pp. 432–455.
See Ernst Bloch, Subjekt-Objekt: Erläuterungen zu Hegel, 2d ed. ( Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1962 ), pp. 188–189.
Sämtliche Werke ed. Glockner (Stuttgart, Frommann, 1958), Vol. 6, p. 48.
In fact the term ‘experience’ only occurs thrice, each time in a polemical context incidental to the main exposition of the conception of the phenomenology. (See PM pp. 161,162).
William James, The Principles of Psychology [1918], 2 vols. (New York, Dover, 1950), vol. 1, p. 218 (cited by Aron Gurwitsch, ‘Towards a Theory of Intentionality,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (1970), 359.)
See Hume’s Introduction to his A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1964), p. xxi.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greene, M. (1984). Hegel’s Conception of Psychology. In: Cohen, R.S., Wartofsky, M.W. (eds) Hegel and the Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 64. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6233-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6233-0_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6235-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6233-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive