Skip to main content

Hegel’s Conception of Psychology

  • Chapter
Hegel and the Sciences

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 64))

  • 233 Accesses

Abstract

The present paper seeks to understand Hegel’s notion of a philosophical or ‘scientific’ psychology, these terms being synonymous for him. First the paper notes Hegelian criticisms of various approaches to psychology, whose diverse failings, Hegel often says, derive from a proceeding through “external reflection,” or the “reflective understanding.”1 External reflection, according to Hegel, is a philosophizing from the standpoint ‘outside’ the Sache selbst, and we may say that in Hegel’s view, external reflection constitutes the main obstacle toward a philosophical psychology. With regard to such a psychology, external reflection takes on an especially problematic form in post-Cartesian philosophy as a philosophizing from the subjective consciousness. For when such a philosophizing turns to consciousness itself, should not its procedure be eo ipso immanent to the Sache selbst? In fact, says Hegel, it is not; rather its procedure in dealing with the soul or mind or consciousness is but a special form of external reflection. It is this post-Cartesian form of external reflection, particularly in its most challenging embodiment in the Kantian Critical philosophy, that Hegel’s approach is designed to overcome. The attempt to elucidate the nature of the problem here forms the second part of our paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. For one statement of Hegel’s meaning of external reflection, particularly as contrasted with dialectical thinking, see L [W, 1892], p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hegel intended to write a separate full-scale work on subjective spirit but did not live

    Google Scholar 

  3. to do so. See Friedhelm Nicolin, ‘Hegels Arbeiten zur Theorie des subjektiven Geistes’ in J. Derbolav and F. Nicolin, eds., Erkenntnis und Verantwortung. Festschrift für Theodor Litt ( Düsseldorf, Schwann, 1960 ), pp. 356–374.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Referring to Condillac’s model of the mind, Hegel says, it shows a successive emergence of mental faculties in a “solely affirmative manner” that misses the “negative aspect” whereby the sensible material is “transmuted into mind and destroyed as a sensible.”(PM p. 183).

    Google Scholar 

  5. On the question of the role of the philosopher, see Kenley R. Dove, ‘Hegel’s Pheno- menological Method’, Review of Metaphysics 23 (1970), 627 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  6. “Psychologists may not expressly speak of parts of the soul or mind, but the mode in which this subject is treated by the analytic understanding is largely founded on the analogy of this finite relation.”(L [W, 1892], p. 246; see also p. 365).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See R. C. Solomon, ‘Hegel’s Concept of “Geist” ’, Review of Metaphysics 23 (1970), 642–661.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, tr. J. Ellington (Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill, 1970), p. 8; Theodore Mischel, ‘Kant and the Possibility of a Science of Psychology’ in Kant Studies Today, ed. L. W. Beck (La Salle, III., Open Court, 1969) pp. 432–455.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Ernst Bloch, Subjekt-Objekt: Erläuterungen zu Hegel, 2d ed. ( Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1962 ), pp. 188–189.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sämtliche Werke ed. Glockner (Stuttgart, Frommann, 1958), Vol. 6, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  11. In fact the term ‘experience’ only occurs thrice, each time in a polemical context incidental to the main exposition of the conception of the phenomenology. (See PM pp. 161,162).

    Google Scholar 

  12. William James, The Principles of Psychology [1918], 2 vols. (New York, Dover, 1950), vol. 1, p. 218 (cited by Aron Gurwitsch, ‘Towards a Theory of Intentionality,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (1970), 359.)

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Hume’s Introduction to his A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1964), p. xxi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greene, M. (1984). Hegel’s Conception of Psychology. In: Cohen, R.S., Wartofsky, M.W. (eds) Hegel and the Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 64. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6233-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6233-0_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6235-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6233-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics