Skip to main content

Geopolitics and the Conduct of Modern Warfare

  • Chapter
On Geopolitics: Classical and Nuclear

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 20))

  • 227 Accesses

Abstract

In some respects, geopolitics was at the source of the concept of the “field” or “environment” in international relations theory. Geopolitics has been studied in turn conceptually as a pattern of relations, as a doctrine and at times as an ideology; its reputation reached a peak towards the end of the nineteenth century, and more particularly during the period between the two World Wars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Particularly The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, published in 1890.

    Google Scholar 

  2. As opposed to the outer insular crescent according to Mackinder’s theories. Cf. Derwent Whitlesey: “Haushofer: The Geopoliticians,” in Edward Mead Earle, Makers of Modern Strategy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1943; paperback printing edition of 1971), p. 404. This inner crescent corresponds to Spykman’s “Rimland” and to Brzezinskifs “arc of crisis.”

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hence the term defending the interests of socialism on the periphery used by Helene Carrere d’Encausse.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pakistan might also be destined for a supporting role.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. Hajo Holborn “Moltke and Schlieffen: The Prussian-German School” in Edward Mead Earle, op.cit., p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  6. During the Second World War, national navies lost 21.6 million tons, 68% of which was sunk by submarines of the Axis powers. In the Mediterranean alone, 44 of Allied losses were the result of air attacks. Cf. George Lindsey, Protection of Shipping in the 1980s (mimeographed), Ottawa, ORAE.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aan, Document X201 (1980), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. Charles Di Bona and William O’Keefe, “Quantifying the Sealane Problem,” in Paul H. Nitze and Leonard Sullivan, Jr., Securing the Seas: The Soviet Naval Challenge and Western Alliance Options (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press Inc., 1979 ), pp. 337–380.

    Google Scholar 

  9. George Lindsey, op.cit., p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Albert Wohlstetter, “Illusions of Distance,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 46, No. 2, January 1968, pp. 242–255.

    Google Scholar 

  11. U.S.-Soviet Military Balance, pp. 527–530.

    Google Scholar 

  12. With the C-5A Galaxy, the C-141 Starlifter and the C-130E Hercules, the United States has a load-carrying capacity of nearly 20,000 tons. However, it could not maintain a 30-day reserve capacity to meet the dual requirement of airlifts to Europe and to the Gulf region. Cf. Patrick Oster, “U.S. Ability to Move War Gear Lags,” Chicago Sun-Times, 28 June 1981. See also the May 1981 edition of the Armed Forces Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  13. About 110 aircraft (fighters and interceptors).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tom Wheelock, “America’s Security in the 1980s,” 23rd ISSS Conference, London, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cf. Jacques Soppelsa, “Géopolitique et Stratégie,” Defense Nationale, June 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cf. Colin S. Gray, The Geopolitics of the Nuclear Era: Heartland, Rimlands and the Technological Revolution (New York: Crane, Russak&Co., Inc., 1977 ), p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cf. David Layzer, “The Arrow of Time,” Scientific American, December 1975, pp. 56–70. Here Layzer draws upon Shannon’s general theories. See also Warren G. Proctor, “Negative Absolute Temperatures,” Scientific American, August 1978, pp. 90–102, and especially p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Until quite recently data were processed by the Illiac 4, the data-processing capacity of which was almost as high as that of the Cray-1. The difference lies in the capacity of the Cray-1 for real-time data processing.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cf. George Lindsey, The Battlefield of the 1990’s, 0RAE Memorandum M 110, Ottawa, December 1982, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Can Nuclear War Be Controlled? Adelphi Papers 169, IISS, London, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Legault, A. (1985). Geopolitics and the Conduct of Modern Warfare. In: Zoppo, C.E., Zorgbibe, C. (eds) On Geopolitics: Classical and Nuclear. NATO ASI Series, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6230-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6230-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6232-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6230-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics