Skip to main content

In vitro physiological approach to classification of Frankia isolates of ‘the Alnus group’, based on urease, protease and β-glucosidase activities

  • Chapter
Frankia Symbioses

Part of the book series: Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences ((DPSS,volume 12))

  • 108 Accesses

Summary

Most of the Frankia strains isolated from Alnus and Myrica species are morphologically almost indistinguishable, when grown under standard culture conditions. They form similar vegetative hyphae while sporangia are produced in variable amounts from strain to strain.

Physiological reactions were assessed in order to compare 20 strains isolated from various species of Alnus and one species of Myrica in Europe and North America. Among invariant negative or positive characteristics, differences in urease, protease and β-glucosidase activities appeared to be of significant value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker D 1982 A cumulative listing of isolated frankiae, the symbiotic nitrogen-fixing actinomycetes. The Actinomycetes 17, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker D 1982 Serologic and host compatibility relationships among the isolated frankiae. Can. J. Bot. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker D, Pengelly W L and Torrey J G 1981 Immunochemica1 analysis of relationships among isolated frankiae (Actinomycetales). Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 31, 148–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaloupka J, Severin A I, Sastry K J, Kucerova H and Strnadova M 1982 Differences in the regulation of exocellular proteinase synthesis during growth and sporogenesis of Bacillus megaterium. Can. J. Microbiol. 28, 1214–1218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodfellow M and Pirouz T 1982 Numerical classification of sporoactinomycetes containing meso-diaminopimefic acid in the cell wall. J. Gen. Microbiol. 128, 503–527.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lalonde M and Calvert H E 1979 Production of Frankia hyphae and spores as infective inoculant for Alnus species. In Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in the Management of temperate Forests. Eds. J C Gordon et al. Oregon State university, Corvallis, pp 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lechevalier M P, Baker D and Horrière F 1983 Physiology, chemistry, serology and infectivity of two Frankia isolates from Alnus incana subsp. rugosa. Can. J. Bot. 61, 2826–2833.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lechevalier M P, Horrière F and Lechevalier H 1982 The biology of Frankia and related organisms. Develop. Indust. Microbiol. 23, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lechevalier M P and Lechevalier H A 1979 The taxonomic position of the actinomycetic endophytes. In Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in the Management of temperate Forests. Ed. J C Gordon et al. Oregon State University, Corvallis, pp 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Le Minor L and Piéchaud M 1963 Une méthode rapide de recherche de la proteolyse de la gélatine. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 105, 792–794.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scharfen J 1973 Urease as a useful criterion in the classification of microaerophilic actinomycetes. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg., 1. Abt. Orig. A 225, 89–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schofield G M and Schaal K P 1980 Rapid micromethods for detecting deamination and decarboxylation of aminoacids, indole production, and reduction of nitrate and nitrite by facultatively anaerobic actinomycetes. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg., 1. Abt. Orig. A 247, 383–391.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schofield G M and Schaal K P 1981 A numerical taxonomic study of members of the Actinomycetaceae and related taxa. J. Gen. Microbiol. 127, 237–259.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stuart C A, van Stratum E and Rustignan R 1945 Further studies on urease production by Proteus and related organisms. J. Bacteriol. 49, 437–444.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wikström M B 1983 Detection of microbial proteolytic activity by a cultivation plate assay in which different proteins absorbed to a hydrophobic surface are used as substrates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45, 393–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Horrière, F. (1984). In vitro physiological approach to classification of Frankia isolates of ‘the Alnus group’, based on urease, protease and β-glucosidase activities. In: Akkermans, A.D.L., Baker, D., Huss-Danell, K., Tjepkema, J.D. (eds) Frankia Symbioses. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6158-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6158-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6160-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6158-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics