Abstract
In his monumental work on Freud, Ricœur argues that Freud’s archaeology needs to be supplemented/counterbalanced/integrated with its own incipient teleology, and he turns to Hegel to find what psychoanalysis has left undeveloped. I am convinced by Ricœur’s critique, but not by his prescription: I agree that Freud’s preoccupation with the past needs to be contextualized within a more comprehensive and integrated understanding of human temporality, but I propose to look in Merleau-Ponty’s thought, rather than Hegel’s, for that context. Both Merleau-Ponty and Hegel understand freedom and reason to be the goals which define human teleology, but Hegel’s absolute reason is incompatible with Merleau-Ponty’s conception of reason as essentially finite. Without pausing to argue the case, here I shall simply opt for finitude and proceed to examine the implications that Merleau-Ponty’s teleology of freedom and reason has for the practice of psychotherapy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Paul Ricœur, Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, transi. Denis Savage (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1970), Book 3, chap. 3. Ricœur purports to discover in Freudianism a certain dialectic of archaeology and teleology that is clearly evident in Hegel (p. 461).
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phénoménologie de la perception (Paris: Editions Gallimard, 1945), pp. 180–202. See Martin Dillon, “Merleau-Ponty on Existential Sexuality: A Critique”, Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 11, no. 1 (Spring 1980); also, Merleau-Ponty, “Le Problème de la passivité: le sommeil, l’inconscient, la mémoire,” Annuaire du College de France (Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1955), pp. 161-64; “Preface” to A. Hesnard, L’Oeuvre de Freud et son importance pour le monde moderne ( Paris: Payot, 1960 ), pp. 5–10.
Jean-Paul Sartre, L’être et le néant ( Paris: Editions Gallimard, 1943 ), p. 722.
Freud, New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1933), p. 80. “Wo Es war, solllch werden.”
Merleau-Ponty, Preface to Hesnard’s L’Oeuvre de Freud, transl. Fisher, in The Essential Writings of Merleau-Ponty, ed. Fisher (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1969 ), p. 86.
Being and Time, transl. Macquarrie and Robinson (Harper and Row: New York, 1962), I, 4, sect. 26, pp. 158-159.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dillon, M. (1984). The Implications of Merleau-Ponty’s Thought for the Practice of Psychotherapy. In: Cho, K.K. (eds) Philosophy and Science in Phenomenological Perspective. Phaenomenologica, vol 95. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6113-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6113-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6115-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6113-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive