Abstract
In the previous chapter, it was claimed that many of the difficulties which Western countries face, are the result of inadequate or distorted patterns of innovation. If each of these difficulties is analysed individually, it will be clearly seen how much the innovation factor contributes to it, and when they are all added up, the indictment is a damning one. It is because we can no longer carry out B-phase innovation as well as the Japanese, that we are losing ground in export markets and are seeing our home markets penetrated increasingly by their products. To the extent that we were slow to innovate in the energy field, we left ourselves similarly at the mercy of the OPEC cartel. The resultant OPEC surpluses, recycled through the international money markets, have been an irresistable temptation to politicians who have elections to win. Whatever chance these might have had of resisting the lure of external borrowing under ‘normal’ conditions, they had none at all of doing so under the combined pressures of Japanese capability, greatly increased energy prices and the salesmen of the international Banks. The resulting major acceleration in the rate of growth of the public sector reduced Western productive and innovative capacity still further, making the crushing effect of the external forces still more devastating. Since democracy itself depends upon a substantial proportion of economic life being independent of the State apparatus, this public sector growth has lessened the capacity of democratic systems to survive.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Atiyah P.S.: The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract. Oxford 1979.
Belloc Hilaire: The Servile State. London 1912.
Wilson C.: History of Unilever. London (1954) I, p. 35.
Dewey Donald: Monopoly in Economics and Law. Chicago (1959) p. 152.
Galbraith J.K.: American Capitalism. London (1952) p. 35.
Kaysen C and Turner D.F.: A Policy for Anti-Trust Law. Cambridge, Mass. (1959) p. 110.
Worcester Jr. D. A.: Monopoly, Big Business and Welfare in the Postwar United States. Seattle (1967) p. 81.
Rowley C.K.: The British Monopolies Commission. London (1966) p. 200.
Benda Julien: La Trahison des clercs. Paris 1927.
Seidon Arthur: Advertising. London 1969.
Hütt W.H.: The Strike-Threat System. New Rochelle (N.Y.) 1973.
von Hayek F.A.: Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago (1948) p. 113.
Dewey Donald: The Theory of Imperfect Competition: A Radical Reconstruction. New York (1969) p. 199.
Dolan Edwin G.: TANSTAAFL (1971) p. 36.
von Hayek F.A.: The Constitution of Liberty. London (1960) p. 71.
Rostow W.W.: Getting From Here to There. London (1979) p. xxv.
Batzel Victor M.: Legal Monopoly in Liberal England. In Business History 22 (1980) p. 189.
Ravenshear A.E.: The Industrial and Commercial Influence of the English Patent System. London (1908) p. 40.
Plant A.: In Economica (1934) p. 33.
Polanyi Michael: In Review of Economic Studies Vol XI No. 2 (1944) p. 61.
Gilfillan S.C.: Invention and the Patent System. Washington D.C. 1964.
Gilfillan S.C.: The Sociology of Invention. Boston. 1935, repr. 1970.
Villard H.H.: Economic Performance. New York (1959) p. 367.
Beier F.K.: Problems of Economic Exploitation of Basic Research Findings. Weinheim/Bergstr. 1982.
Hamson C.J.: Patent Rights for Scientific Discoveries. Indianapolis 1929.
Wilson David: Penicillin in Perspective. London (1976) p. 237.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kingston, W. (1984). Proposals for innovation. In: The Political Economy of Innovation. Studies in Industrial Organization, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6071-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6071-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6073-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6071-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive