Abstract
Since innovation in free economies depends upon market power, its roots will be found in whatever gives rise to market power. This will invariably be found to be some provision of positive law. As discussed in the first chapter, laws establishing and protecting private property are a necessary condition for markets to exist at all, even in the most primitive form. Markets as we know them to-day, however, have been brought into being by much legislation which has extended the reality of property far beyond its original limits. This legislation reflected a process of attenuation of the effect of medieval law on business which had been progressively evident since the Reformation. The Common Law, which is so important in Anglo-Saxon countries, has its roots in the Canon Law of the medieval church. Consequently, its reduced influence in these countries can be seen as an aspect of the waning of ecclesiastical power. Since property means the capacity to prevent others from doing what the property owner can do, any new legal means of limiting the range of activity of others, can represent an extension of property rights. Such an extension may be seen in the changing attitudes of the civil courts towards agreements in restraint of trade. Such agreements obviously extend the market power of those who make them, at the expense of others. The attitudes of the Courts to them evolved from partial suppression during the period up to the seventeenth century, to tolerance in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Rowley Charles K: The British Monopolies Commission. London (1966) p. 47.
Landes David: The Unbound Prometheus. Cambridge (1970) p. 16.
Ripert G.: Aspects Juridiques du Capitalisme Moderne. Paris (1946) pp. 59–62; Landes op. cit. p. 197.
Gilfillan S.C.: Invention and the Patent System. Washington D.C. (1964) p. 8.
Report of the President’s Commission on Technological Innovation (Baruch). Washington, D.C. (1979) p. 205.
Rolt L.T.C.: Tools for the job. London (1965).
Schechter F.I.: The Historical Foundation of the Law Relating to Trade Marks. New York (1925).
Cornish W.R.: Intellectual Property. London (1981).
Blanco White T.A.: Industrial Property and Copyright. London (1962) p. 88.
Salmond J.W.: Law of Torts 6th edn. London. (1965) p. 565–6.
Hindmarch W.M.: in Houseof Commons Report of Select Committee on the Trade Marks Bill (1862) (212) XII paragraphs 2771–4; 2822–6.
Mason E.S.: Economic Concentration and the Monopoly Problem, Cambridge (Mass.) (1959) p. 334.
Hiance P. and Plasseraud Y.: Brevets et Sous-Développement. Paris (1971).
Murdoch H.J.P.: Invention and the Irish Patent System. Dublin (1971).
The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, 6th Edn. London (1949) p. 62.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kingston, W. (1984). The legal roots of innovation. In: The Political Economy of Innovation. Studies in Industrial Organization, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6071-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6071-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6073-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6071-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive