Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Uranium exploration techniques

  • Chapter
Uranium geochemistry, mineralogy, geology, exploration and resources

Abstract

As would be expected from the scope and number of pages assigned to this paper, it is of necessity rather basic in nature. The main purpose is to present an introduction to how uranium is found, with the hope that an explorationist will find concepts that stimulate his thought.

Pleistocene though Eocene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rogers J. J. W. and Adams J. A. S. Thorium and uranium. In Handbook of geochemistry Wedepohl K. E. ed. (Berlin, etc.: Springer, 1978, II-V, pt 90, 39 p. and pt 92, 50 p.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nichols C. E. etal. Uranium geochemical survey in the Crystal City and Beeville quadrangles, Texas. Open File Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJBX-19(77), 1977, 326 p.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nichols C. E. etal. Wide-spaced uranium geochemical survey in the Plainview, Lubbock, and Big Spring quadrangles, Texas. Open File Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJBX-73(78), Dec. 1977, 229 p.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nichols C. E. etal. Hydrogeochemical and stream sediment pilot survey of Llano area, Texas. Open File Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJBX-36(76), 1976, 152 p.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nichols C. E. etal. Northwest Texas pilot geochemical survey. Open File Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJBX-60(76), 1976, 227 p.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McMillan R. H. Genetic aspects and classification of important Canadian uranium deposits. In Short course in uranium deposits: their mineralogy and origin Kimberley M. M. ed. ( Toronto: The University Press for Mineralogical Association of Canada, 1978 ), 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mickle D. G. ed. A preliminary classification of uranium deposits. Open File Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJBX-63(78), May 1978, 77 p.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mickle D. G. and Mathews G. W. eds. Geological characteristics of environments favorable for uranium deposits. Open File Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJBX-67 (78), Nov. 1978, 250 p.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mathews G. W. etal. Preliminary recognition criteria for uranium occurrences: a field guide. Open File Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJBX-32(79), Feb. 1979, 47 p.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shockey P. N. Renfro A. R. and Peterson R. J. Copper-silver solution fronts at Paoli, Oklahoma. Econ. Geol., 69, 1974, 266–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fischer R. P. Vanadium-uranium deposits in the Rifle Creek area, Garfield county, Colorado. Bull. U.S. geol. Surv. 1101, 1960, 52 p.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rackley R. I. Environment of Wyoming Tertiary uranium deposits. Mountain Geol., 9, no. 2–3 1972, 143–57.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruzicka V. Geological comparison between East European and Canadian uranium deposits. Pap. geol. Surv. Can. 70–48, 1971, 196 p.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dahlkamp F. J. and Adams S. S. Geology and recognition criteria for veinlike uranium deposits of the Lower to Middle Proterozoic unconformity and strata-related types. Open File Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJBX-5(81), Jan. 1981, 253 p.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stuckless J. S. et al. Geochemical and petrological studies of an uraniferous granite from the Granite Mountains, Wyoming. J. Res. U.S. geol. Surv., 5, 1977, 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rich R. A. Holland H. D. and Petersen U. Hydrothermal uranium deposits ( Amsterdam, etc.: Elsevier, 1977 ), 264 p.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dahlkamp F. J. Typology and geographic/geotectonic distribution of uranium deposits. In Energy resources Burollet P. F. and Ziegler V. eds (Paris: Edition Technip, 1980), 499–536. (26th Int. geol. Congr., ColloqueC2)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jennings J. K. and Leventhal J. S. A new structural model for humic material which shows sites for attachment of oxidized uranium species. In Short papers of the U.S. Geological Survey uranium- thorium symposium, 1977 Campbell J. A. ed. Circ. U.S. geol. Surv. 753, 1977, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wanty R. B. Langmuir D. and Chatham J. R. Ground water pro-specting for sandstone-type uranium deposits; the merits of mineral- solution equilibria versus single element tracer methods, volume II. Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJO 79-360-E, 1981, 91 p.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bosschart R. A. and Pemberton R. H. Applications and limitations of airborne electromagnetic systems in mineral exploration. Min. Canada, 42, May 1969, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Morley L. W. and Bhattacharyya B. K. Quantitative treatment of aeromagnetic data in mineral areas. Can. Min. metall. Bull., 59, 1966, 733–42.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Spector A. Aeromagnetic map interpretation with the aid of the digital computer. Can. Min. metall. Bull., 64, July 1971, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Paterson N. R. Airborne electromagnetic methods as applied to the search for sulphide deposits. Can. Min. metall. Bull., 64, Jan. 1971, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Palacky G. J. Interpretation of INPUT AEM measurements in areas of conductive overburden. Geophysics, 40, 1975, 490–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Scott W. J. and Fraser D. C. Drilling of EM anomalies caused by overburden. Can. Min. metall. Bull., 66, July 1973, 72–7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lazenby P. G. New developments in the INPUT airborne EM system. Can. Min. metall. Bull., 66, April 1973, 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Palacky G. J. and West G. F. Quantitative interpretation of INPUT AEM measurements. Geophysics, 38, 1973, 1145–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Palacky G. J. Use of decay patterns for the classification of anomalies in time-domain AEM measurements. Geophysics, 41, 1976, 1031–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Levinson A. A. Introduction to exploration geochemistry ( Calgary, Alberta: Applied Publishing Ltd., 1974 ), 612 p.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dyck W. Uranium, radon, helium and other trace elements and gases in well waters of parts of the St. Lawrence lowlands (Ottawa region), Canada. J. geochem. Explor., 13, 1980, 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stuckless J. S. and Nkomo I. T. Uranium-lead isotope systematics in uraniferous alkali-rich granites from the Granite Mountains, Wyoming; implications for uranium source rocks. Econ. Geol., 73, 1978, 427–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosholt J. N. Zartman R. E. and Nkomo I. T. Lead isotope systematics and uranium depletion in the Granite Mountains, Wyoming. Bull. geol. Soc. Am., 84, 1973, 989–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Price T. J. Callihan M. C. and Young R. G. Pedro Mountain drill-ing project, Carbon county, Wyoming. Open File Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJBX-56(76), 1976, 19 p.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stuckless J. S. Uranium and thorium concentrations in Pre- cambrian granites as indicators of a uranium province in central Wyoming. Contrib. Geology, Univ. Wyo., 17, no. 2 1979, 173–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rosholt J. N. and Bartel A. J. Uranium, thorium and lead systematics in Granite Mountains, Wyoming. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 7, 1969, 141–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nichol I. Garrett R. G. and Webb J. S. The role of some statistical and mathematical methods in the interpretation of regional geochemical data. Econ. Geol, 64, 1969, 204–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chaffee M. A. Botbol J. M. and Hamilton J. C. The distribution of selected elements in stream sediments, central Maine. Open File Rep. U.S. geol. Surv., 1972, 8 p.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dyck W. Field and laboratory methods used in the Geological Survey of Canada in geochemical surveys, no. 10: radon determination apparatus for geochemical prospecting for uranium. Pap. geol. Surv. Can. 68–21, 1969, 30 p.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Morse R. H. Getting the most out of radon geochemistry: abstract. Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol., 64, May 1980, 754.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Morse R. H. Radon counters in uranium exploration. In Exploration for uranium ore deposits: proceedings of a symposium, Vienna, 1976 ( Vienna: IAEA, 1976 ), 229–39.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Barretto P. M. C. Radon-222 emanation characteristics of rocks and minerals. In Radon in uranium mining: proceedings of a panel, Washington, D.C., December 1973 ( Vienna: IAEA, 1975 ), 129–50.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Morse R. H. Wealth of field experience becomes available to help fine-tune portable radon detectors. North. Miner, 64, March 8 1979, C12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Czarnecki R. F. Pacer J. C. and Freeman R. W. Advances in radon exploration techniques for uranium: abstract. Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol., 64, May 1980, 695.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pogorski L. A. and Quirt G. S. Helium surveying for deeply buried uranium deposits: abstract. Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol., 64, May 1980, 766–7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Erdman J. A. and Harrach G. H. Uranium in big sagebrush from western U.S. and evidence of possible mineralization in the Owyhee Mountains of Idaho. J. geochem. Explor., 14, 1981, 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vijan P. N. et al. A semi-automated method for the determination of arsenic in soil and vegetation by gas-phase sampling and atomic absorption spectrometry. Analyt. chim. Acta. 82, 1976, 329–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hawkes H. E. and Webb J. S. Geochemistry in mineral exploration ( New York: Harper and Row, 1962 ), 415 p.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bowker A. H. and Liberman G. J. Engineering statistics ( Engle- wood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1959 ), 585 p.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tennant C. B. and White M. L. Study of the distribution of some geochemical data. Econ. Geol., 54, 1959, 1281–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lepeltier C. A simplified statistical treatment of geochemical data by graphical representation. Econ. Geol., 64, 1969, 538–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sinclair A. J. Selection of threshold values in geochemical data using probability graphs. J. geochem. Explor., 3, 1974, 129–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rose A. W. Hawkes H. E. and Webb J. S. Geochemistry in mineral exploration, 2nd edn ( London, etc.: Academic Press, 1979 ), 657 p.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kane V. E. Baer T. and Begovich C. L. Principal component testing for outliers. Open File Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJBX-71(77), 1977, 77 p.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rose A. W. Dahlberg E. C. and Keith M. L. A multiple regression technique for adjusting background values in stream sediment geochemistry. Econ. Geol., 65, 1970, 156–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. David M. Geostatistics—bloodhound of uranium exploration. Can. Min. J., 100, May 1979, 111–3.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Journel A. G. Geological reconnaissance to exploitation—a decade of applied geostatistics. Can. Min. metall. Bull., 68, June 1975, 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Jöreskog K. G. Klovan J. E. and Reyment R. A. Geological factor analysis ( New York, etc.: Elsevier, 1976 ), 178 p.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Koch G. S. Jr. and Link R. F. Statistical analysis of geological data, vol. 11 ( New York, etc.: Wiley, 1971 ), 438 p.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Klovan J. E. R- and Q-mode factor analysis. In Concepts in geostatistics McCammon R. B. ed. ( New York, etc.: Springer, 1975 ), 21–69.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Nichol I. The role of computerized data systems in geochemical exploration. Can. Min. metall. Bull., 66, Jan. 1973, 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Froidevaux R. Jaquet J. M. and Thomas R. L. AGCL, a Fortran IV program for agglomerative, nonhierarchical Q-mode classification of large data sets. Computers Geosci, 3, no. 1-C 1977, 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  62. David M. Dagbert M. and Beauchemin Y. Statistical analysis in geology: correspondence analysis method. Colo. Sch. Mines Q., 72, no. 1 1977, 60 p.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Schmidt-Collerus J. J. Investigation of the relationship between organic matter and uranium deposits. Open File Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJBX-130(79), 1979, 281 p.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Adams S. S. and Saucier A. E. Geology and recognition criteria for uraniferous humate deposits, Grants uranium region, New Mexico. Open File Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJBX-2(81), 1980, 226 p.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Peterson F. and Turner-Peterson C. E. Lacustrine-humate model: sedimentologic and geochemical model for tabular sandstone uranium deposits in the Morrison Formation, Utah, and application to uranium exploration. Open File Rep. U.S. geol. Surv. 80–319, 1980, 46 p.

    Google Scholar 

  66. King J. W. and Austin S. R. Some characteristics of roll-type uranium deposits at Gas Hills, Wyoming. Min. Engng, N. Y., 18, May 1966, 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Harshman E. N. Distribution of elements in some roll-type uranium deposits. In Formation of uranium ore deposits ( Vienna: IAEA, 1974 ), 169–83.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Adams S. S. and Smith R. B. Geology and recognition criteria for sandstone uranium deposits in mixed fluvial-shallow marine sedi-mentary sequences, South Texas. Open File Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJBX-4(81), 1981, 143 p.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Klohn M. L. and Pickens W. R. Geology of the Felder uranium deposit, Live Oak county, Texas. AIME Preprint 70-1-38, 1970, 19 p.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Reynolds R. L. and Goldhaber M. B. Origin of a South Texas roll- type uranium deposit: I. Alteration of iron-titanium oxide minerals. Econ. Geol., 73, 1978, 1677–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Goldhaber M. B. Reynolds R. L. and Rye R. O. Origin of a South Texas roll-type uranium deposit: II. Sulfide petrology and sulfur isotope studies. Econ. Geol., 73, 1978, 1690–705.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hoag R. B. Jr. and Webber G. R. Significance for mineral explora¬tion of sulphate concentrations in groundwaters. CIM Bull., 69, Dec. 1976, 86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Goldhaber M. B. and Reynolds R. L. Origin of marcasite and its significance for understanding the genesis of roll-front uranium deposits. Open File Rep. U.S. geol. Surv. 79–1696, 1979, 38 p.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Harshman E. N. and Adams S. S. Geology and recognition criteria for roll-type uranium deposits in continental sandstones. Open File Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJBX-1(81), 1981, 185 p.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Austin S. R. Some patterns of sulfur isotope distribution in uranium deposits. Earth Sci. Bull., 3, no. 2 1970, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Chatham J. R. Wanty R. B. and Langmuir D. Groundwater pro-specting for sandstone-type uranium deposits: the merits of mineral- solution equilibria versus single element tracer methods. Rep. U.S. Dep. Energy GJ079-360-E, 1981, 197 p.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Nash J. T. Granger H. C. and Adams S. S. Geology and concepts of genesis of important types of uranium deposits. Econ. Geol. 75th anniversary vol., 1981, 63–116.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Nash J. T. Empirical recognition criteria for unconformity-type uranium deposits applied to some Proterozoic terranes in the United States. Open File Rep. U.S. geol. Surv. 81–793, 1981, 18 p.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Tilsley J. E. Continental weathering and development of palaeo- surface-related uranium deposits: some genetic considerations. In Uranium in the Pine Creek Geosyncline: proceedings of the inter-national uranium symposium, Sydney, 1979 Ferguson J. and Goleby A. B. eds ( Vienna: IAEA, 1980 ), 721–32.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Hoeve J. and Sibbald T. 1.1. Uranium concentration related to the sub-Athabasca unconformity, northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Reference 6, 475–84.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Hoeve J. and Sibbald T. I.I. Uranium metallogenesis and its significance to exploration in the Athabasca Basin. In Uranium exploration techniques Parslow G. R. ed. Spec. Publ. Sask. geol. Soc. no. 4, 1978, 161–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nichols Associates, Reno, Nevada, USA

    Chester E. Nichols

Authors
  1. Chester E. Nichols
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Benedetto De Vivo Felice Ippolito G. Capaldi P. R. Simpson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Dr. C. E. Nichols

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nichols, C.E. (1984). Uranium exploration techniques. In: De Vivo, B., Ippolito, F., Capaldi, G., Simpson, P.R. (eds) Uranium geochemistry, mineralogy, geology, exploration and resources. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6060-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6060-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6062-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6060-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation