Advertisement

Measurement of Grazing Behaviour and Herbage Intake on Two Different Grazing Management Systems for Beef Production

  • M. O’Sullivan
Part of the Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science book series (CTVM, volume 28)

Abstract

Two systems of grazing management for beef production were compared, a continuously grazed system with a 20 × 1 day rotational paddock grazing system at two stocking rates for three years. No difference was obtained in net herbage accumulation between the systems, but the high stocking rate reduced herbage production by 7.5%. Rotational grazing increased animal production per hectare by 33% at the high stocking rate and by 7.6% at the low stocking rate. Although the animals grazed pastures of different digestibilities, they always selected material of similar digestibility. The length of time spent grazing and the distance walked in the process was greater for the continuously grazed animals than for the rotationally grazed animals. Consequently the set stocked cattle had a 44% greater grazing energy expenditure than the rotationally grazed cattle. The efficiency of food conversion was greater under rotational grazing as a result of lower maintenance energy requirements.

Keywords

Chromic Oxide Carcass Weight Beef Production Grazing Management Grazing Season 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Conway, A. 1963a. Effect of grazing management on beef production. I. Comparison of three systems of grazing. Ir.J.agric.Res. 2 87Google Scholar
  2. Conway, A. 1963b. Effect of grazing management on beef production. II. Comparison of three stocking rates under three systems of grazing. Ir. J. agric.Res. 2 243Google Scholar
  3. Conway, A. 1964. Effect of grazing management on beef production. III. Effect of stocking rate and grazing method on carcass measurements. Ir. J. agric. Res. 3 165Google Scholar
  4. Coop, I.E. and Hill, M.K. 1962. The energy requirement of sheep for maintenance and gain. J. agric.Sci.,Camb. 58 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corbett, J.L., Langlands, J.P. and Boyne, W.A. 1961. An estimate of the energy expended for maintenance by strip grazed dairy cows. Proc. 8th Int.Grassld Cong., p.245Google Scholar
  6. Drew, J.P. and Deasy, D. 1937. An investigation into the intensive system of grassland management. J. Dept.Agric.,Dublin 24 3Google Scholar
  7. Ernst, P., LeDu,Y.L.P. and Carlier, L. 1980. Animal and sward production under rotational and continuous grazing management — a critical appraisal. Proc. Int. Symp. Eur. Grassld Fed. on the role of nitrogen in intensive grassland production, Wageningen, p.119Google Scholar
  8. Es, A.J.M. van 1974. Energy intake and requirement of dairy cows during the whole year. Livest. Prod. Sci., 1 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Graham, N. McC. 1964a. Energy costs of feeding activities and energy expenditure of grazing sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 15 969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Graham, N. McC. 1964b. Maintenance requirements of sheep indoors and at pasture. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 5 272Google Scholar
  11. Hodgson, J. and Rodriguez, J.M. 1970. The measurement of herbage intake in grazing studies. Ann. Rep. GRI, Hurley, p. 132Google Scholar
  12. Hodgson, J. and Wade, M.H. 1978. Grazing systems and herbage production. In: Proc. Br. Grassld Soc.,Winter Meeting, p.1.1–1.12Google Scholar
  13. Lambourne, L.J. and Reardon, T.F. 1963. Effect of environment on the maintenance requirements of merino wethers. Aust.J. agric.Res. 14 272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MAFF 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical Bulletin 33, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1976,p.5Google Scholar
  15. Marsh, R. 1975. Systems of grazing management for beef cattle. In: Pasture utilisation by the grazing animal. Ed. J. Hodgson and D.K. Jackson. Occasional Symposium No.8,British Grassland Society,p.119Google Scholar
  16. McCarthy, D. 1979. Milk production from grassland. In:Proc.Milk Production Seminar, Moorepark, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  17. McMeekan, C.P. 1956. Grazing management and animal production. Proc.7th Int.Grassld Cong.,p.146Google Scholar
  18. McMeekan, C.P. and Walshe, M.J. 1963. The inter-relationships of grazing method and stocking rate in the efficiency of pasture utilisation by dairy cattle. J. agric.Sci., Camb. 61 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tilley, J.M.A. and Terry, R.A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18 108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Williams, C.H., David, D.J. and Ilsmaa, O. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J.agric. Sci.,Camb. 59 381CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels-Luxembourg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. O’Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.The Agricultural InstituteJohnstown CastleWexfordIreland

Personalised recommendations