The Clinical Use of Ambulatory Monitoring in Arrhythmia Evaluation

  • Erik Sandøe
  • J. D. Andersen
  • E. Gymoese
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 37)


A review of current clinical use of ambulatory monitoring in arrhythmia evaluation is presented. Ambulatory monitoring is particularly useful for evaluating the role played by known or syspected cardiac arrhythmias in patient symptomatology. Ambulatory monitoring can be useful in the evaluation of the clinical significance of conduction defects or complex ventricular arrhythmias observed in the ECG-recording of the asymptomatic patient. Its role in the evaluation of risk of sudden death in the asymptomatic patient is doubtful at present. Other parameters such as ventricular failure and exercise ECG seem more useful. Improved technology can remove most present drawbacks and increase utility of the technique.


Sudden Death Ventricular Tachycardia Ambulatory Monitoring Conduction Defect Ventricular Extrasystole 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Andersen JD, Gymoese E, Arndal P et al. Problems in ambulatory monitoring. In: Trends in computer-processed electrocardiograms, 51–51 (van Bemmel JH, Willems JL, eds.). North-Holland Publishing Co. Amsterdam 1977.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antman EM, Cohn PF. Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. In: Diagnostic methods in clinical cardiology, pp. 29–50. (Cohn PF, Wynne J, eds.). Little, Brown & Co, Boston 1982.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bragg-Remschel DA, Anderson CM, Winkle RA. Frequency response characteristics of ambulatory ECG monitoring systems and their implications for ST segmant analysis. Am Heart J 1982;103:20–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jensen G, Sigurd B, Meibom J et al. Adams-Stokes syndrome caused by paroxysmal third-degree atrio-ventricular block. Brit Heart J 1973;35/5:516–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jensen G, Sigurd B, Sandøe E. Adams-Stokes seizures due to ventricular tachydysrhythmias in patients with heart block: prevalence and problems of management. Chest 1975;67/1:43–48.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johansson BW. Evaluation of alteration of consciousness and palpitations. In: Ambulatory electrocardiographic recording, p. 321–330. (Wenger NK, Mock MB, Ringquist I, eds.). Year Book Medical publishers, Chicago 1982.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Josephson ME. Holter monitoring. Uses and misuses. Hospital Practise, May 1981, 67–81.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lown B, Podrid PJ, DeSilva RA et al. Sudden cardiac death-management of the patient at risk. Curr Probl Cardiol 1980;4:7-.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moss AJ, Davis HP, DeCamilla J et al. Ventricular ectopic beats and their relation to sudden and nonsudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1979;60:998–1003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Møller M. Ventricular arrhythmias following myocardial infarction. Odense University Press 1981.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rehnquist N. Ventricular arrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction. Prognostic weight and natural history. Eur J Cardiol 1978;7/2:169–187.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ripart A, Jacobson P. Memory technology and implantable Holter systems. In: The third decade of cardiac pacing. (Barold SS, Mugica J, eds.). Futura Publishing Co., New York 1982.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rubermann W, Weinblatt E, Goldberg JD et al. Ventricular premature beats and mortality after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1977;297:750–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rubermann W, Weinblatt E, Goldberg JD et al. Sudden death after myocardial infraction: Runs of ventricular premature beats and R on T as high risk factors. Am J Cardiol 1980;45:444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sandøe E, Sigurd B, Jensen G et al. Cardiac syncopes in patients with sinus rhythm. Singapore Med J 1973;14/3: 312–315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sandøe E. Andersen ED, Andersen JD et al. Clinical efficiency and side-effects of new antiarrhythmic drugs. In: Proc. 9th world congr. cardiol, Moscow 1982. Plenum Press 1983.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schultze RA, Strauss HW, Pitt B. Sudden death following myocardial infarction: Relation to ventricular premature contractions in the late hospital phase and left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Med 1977;62:192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Waldo AL, Arciniegas JG, Klein H. Surgical treatment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias: The role of intraoperative mapping and consideration of presently available surgical techniques. Progr Cardiovasc Dis 1981;23:247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wenger NK, Mock MB, Ringquist I. Ambulatory ECG recording: clinical perspectives. In: Ambulatory electrocardiographic recording, pp. 425–440. (Wenger NK, Mock MB, Ringquist I, eds.). Year Book Medical publishers, Chicago 1982.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wiener I. Pacing techniques in the treatment of tachycardias. Ann Int Med 1980;93:326–329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Winkle RA. Ambulatory electrocardiography and the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of chronic ventricular arrhythmias. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1980;23:99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels-Luxembourg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Sandøe
    • 1
  • J. D. Andersen
    • 1
  • E. Gymoese
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical Department BRigshospitalet CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations