Skip to main content

T. R. Owens, R. L. Wolf: An Adversary Approach to Evaluation

  • Chapter
Systematic Evaluation

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services ((EEHS,volume 8))

  • 309 Accesses

Abstract

Adversary evaluation moves a considerable distance toward the end of the continuum that begins with the Tylerian objectives-performance approach. Developed in the early 1970s, the adversary approach endeavors to illuminate all important aspects of a program being evaluated. Those aspects that are explored may extend beyond objectives originally set for the program. Quasilegal in its approach and structure, the adversary model follows a dialectic process. Two teams of evaluators explore the pros and cons of a program so that its major issues are clarified openly and honestly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Auerbach, C; Garrison, L.K.; Hurst, W.; and Mermin, S. 1961. The adversary system. In The legal process. San Francisco: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, H.N. 1949. Courts on trial. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kourilsky, M. 1973. An adversary model for educational evaluation. Evaluation Comment 4, 2, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. 1974. Scientific method and the adversary model. American Psychologist (September), 666–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, T.R. 1973. Educational evaluation by adversary proceedings. In House, E.R. (ed.), School evaluation: The politics and process. Berkeley: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W. James and Carlson, Dale. “Deep dark deficits of the Adversary Evaluation Model.” Educational Researcher (June 1977), American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. 1967. The methodology of evaluation. In R.E. Stake (ed.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R.E. 1967. The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record 68 (April), 523–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D.; Foley, W.; Gephart, W.; Guba, E.; Hammond, R.; Merriman, H.; and Provus, M. 1971. Educational evaluation and decisionmaking. Itasca, I11.: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, R.L. 1974. The citizen as jurist: A new mode of educational evaluation. Citizen Action in Education (Winter), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, R.L. 1975. Trial by jury. A new evaluation method. Phi Delta Kappan, 57, (November), 185–187.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stufflebeam, D.L., Shinkfield, A.J. (1985). T. R. Owens, R. L. Wolf: An Adversary Approach to Evaluation. In: Systematic Evaluation. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5656-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5656-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8995-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5656-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics