Skip to main content

An Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Evaluation

  • Chapter
Systematic Evaluation

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services ((EEHS,volume 8))

  • 345 Accesses

Abstract

Three major approaches to evaluating programs are set forth in this unit. The first —pseudoevaluation —includes attempts to mislead through evaluation. The second — quasievaluation — encompasses studies that are preoccupied with answering given questions of interest instead of assessing the value of something. The third — true evaluation — considers what we see as comprehensive efforts to examine the worth and merit of an object. Particular study types that are associated with each approach are examined in detail and contrasted with each other. In general, this unit provides an overview of 12 types of evaluation studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alkin, M.C. 1969. Evaluation theory development. Evaluation Comment, 2, 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S.; Ball, S.; Murphy, R.; and Associates. 1973. Encyclopedia of educa tional evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B.S.; Englehart, M.D.; Furst, E. J; Hill, W.H.; and Krathwohl, D.R. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T., and Stanley, J.C. 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental de signs for research on teaching. In N.L. Gage (ed.), Handbook of research on training. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. Dark ghetto. New York: Harper and Row, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S.; Campbell, E.Q.; Hobson, C. J.; McPartland, J.; Mook, A.M.; Weinfeld, F.D.; and York, R.L. 1966. Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. L. 1966. Program evaluation and review techniques, applications in education. U.S. Office of Education Cooperative Monograph, 17 (OE–12024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. 1963. Course improvement through evaluation. Teachers College Record, 64, 672–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J. and Snow, R.E. Individual Differences in Learning Ability as a Function of Instructional Variables. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebel, R.L. 1965. Measuring educational achievement. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.L. 1951. The design of experiments ( 6th ed. ). New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G.V., and Maquire, T.O. 1968. Analysis of time-scires quasi-experiments. (U.S. Office of Education Report No. 6–8329.) Boulder, Col.: Laboratory of Educational Research, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G. 1978. Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. CSE Monograph Series in Evaluation, Los Angeles, Calif. Center for the Study of Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, R.L. 1972. Evaluation at the local level (mimeograph). Tucson, Ariz.: EPIC Evaluation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C; Smith, M.; Adand, H. B., M. J.; Cohen, D.; Gintis, H.; Heynes, B.; and Michelson, S. Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America, New York: Basic Books, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. 1964. The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessinger, L.M. 1970. Every kid a winner: Accountability in education. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linquist, E.F. 1953. Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and educa tion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, B. 1975. Evaluation and the control of education. In D. Tawney (ed.), Evaluation: The state of the art. London: Schools Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metfessel, N.S., and Michael, W.B. 1967. A paradigm involving multiple criterion measures for the evaluation of the effectiveness of school programs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 27, 931–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, T. 1971. Application of adversary proceedings to educational evaluation and decision making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W.J. 1969. Objectives and instruction. In R. Stake (ed.), Instructional objectives. AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation (vol. 3 ). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provus, M.N. 1971. Discrepancy evaluation. Berkeley: McCutcheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard, D.L. Methodology Development for Input Evaluation Using Input Evaluation Using Advocate and Design Teams. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippey, R.M. (ed.). Studies in Transactional Evaluation. Berkeley: McCutcheon, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M.S. 1967. The methodology of evaluation. In R.E. Stake (ed.), Curric- lum evaluation. AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation (vol. 1 ). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R.E. 1967. The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68, 523–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R.E. Program Evaluation, particularly Responsive Evaluation. Occasional Paper Series No. 5, Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D.L. 1966. A depth study of the evaluation requirement. Theory into Practice, 5 (June), 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D.L. 1967. The use and abuse of evaluation in Title III. Theory into Practice, 6 (June), 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D.L. and Webster, W.J. “An Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Evaluation.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, no. 3.2 (May–June 1980), 5–19. Copyright © 1980, American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, E. A. 1967. Evaluative research. New York; Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.P. 1974. An administrator’s perspective of evaluation. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University. (Occasional Paper #2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R.L. 1971. Educational measurement ( 2nd ed. ). Washington, D.C: American Council on Education, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, W.J. “The Organization and Functions of Research and Evaluation in Large Urban School Districts.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C, March 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C Evaluation Research: Methods of Assessing Program Effectiveness, Engle-wood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, D.E. and Bock, R.D. Quasi-experimentation in Educational Settings: Comment. The School Review, Winter, 1967, 35 3–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, R.L. “How teachers feel toward evaluation.” In E.R. House (ed.), School evaluation: The Politics and Process. Berkeley: McCutcheon, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stufflebeam, D.L., Shinkfield, A.J. (1985). An Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Evaluation. In: Systematic Evaluation. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5656-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5656-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8995-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5656-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics