Abstract
Three major approaches to evaluating programs are set forth in this unit. The first —pseudoevaluation —includes attempts to mislead through evaluation. The second — quasievaluation — encompasses studies that are preoccupied with answering given questions of interest instead of assessing the value of something. The third — true evaluation — considers what we see as comprehensive efforts to examine the worth and merit of an object. Particular study types that are associated with each approach are examined in detail and contrasted with each other. In general, this unit provides an overview of 12 types of evaluation studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alkin, M.C. 1969. Evaluation theory development. Evaluation Comment, 2, 2–7.
Anderson, S.; Ball, S.; Murphy, R.; and Associates. 1973. Encyclopedia of educa tional evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, p. 142.
Bloom, B.S.; Englehart, M.D.; Furst, E. J; Hill, W.H.; and Krathwohl, D.R. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
Campbell, D.T., and Stanley, J.C. 1963. Experimental and quasi-experimental de signs for research on teaching. In N.L. Gage (ed.), Handbook of research on training. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Clark, K. Dark ghetto. New York: Harper and Row, 1963.
Coleman, J.S.; Campbell, E.Q.; Hobson, C. J.; McPartland, J.; Mook, A.M.; Weinfeld, F.D.; and York, R.L. 1966. Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
Cook, D. L. 1966. Program evaluation and review techniques, applications in education. U.S. Office of Education Cooperative Monograph, 17 (OE–12024).
Cronbach, L.J. 1963. Course improvement through evaluation. Teachers College Record, 64, 672–683.
Cronbach, L.J. and Snow, R.E. Individual Differences in Learning Ability as a Function of Instructional Variables. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1969.
Ebel, R.L. 1965. Measuring educational achievement. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Fisher, R.L. 1951. The design of experiments ( 6th ed. ). New York: Hafner.
Glass, G.V., and Maquire, T.O. 1968. Analysis of time-scires quasi-experiments. (U.S. Office of Education Report No. 6–8329.) Boulder, Col.: Laboratory of Educational Research, University of Colorado.
Guba, E.G. 1978. Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. CSE Monograph Series in Evaluation, Los Angeles, Calif. Center for the Study of Evaluation.
Hammond, R.L. 1972. Evaluation at the local level (mimeograph). Tucson, Ariz.: EPIC Evaluation Center.
Jencks, C; Smith, M.; Adand, H. B., M. J.; Cohen, D.; Gintis, H.; Heynes, B.; and Michelson, S. Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America, New York: Basic Books, 1972.
Kaplan, A. 1964. The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler.
Lessinger, L.M. 1970. Every kid a winner: Accountability in education. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Linquist, E.F. 1953. Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and educa tion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
McDonald, B. 1975. Evaluation and the control of education. In D. Tawney (ed.), Evaluation: The state of the art. London: Schools Council.
Metfessel, N.S., and Michael, W.B. 1967. A paradigm involving multiple criterion measures for the evaluation of the effectiveness of school programs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 27, 931–943.
Owens, T. 1971. Application of adversary proceedings to educational evaluation and decision making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Popham, W.J. 1969. Objectives and instruction. In R. Stake (ed.), Instructional objectives. AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation (vol. 3 ). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Provus, M.N. 1971. Discrepancy evaluation. Berkeley: McCutcheon.
Reinhard, D.L. Methodology Development for Input Evaluation Using Input Evaluation Using Advocate and Design Teams. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University, 1972.
Rippey, R.M. (ed.). Studies in Transactional Evaluation. Berkeley: McCutcheon, 1973.
Scriven, M.S. 1967. The methodology of evaluation. In R.E. Stake (ed.), Curric- lum evaluation. AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation (vol. 1 ). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Stake, R.E. 1967. The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68, 523–540.
Stake, R.E. Program Evaluation, particularly Responsive Evaluation. Occasional Paper Series No. 5, Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center 1975.
Stufflebeam, D.L. 1966. A depth study of the evaluation requirement. Theory into Practice, 5 (June), 121–134.
Stufflebeam, D.L. 1967. The use and abuse of evaluation in Title III. Theory into Practice, 6 (June), 126–133.
Stufflebeam, D.L. and Webster, W.J. “An Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Evaluation.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, no. 3.2 (May–June 1980), 5–19. Copyright © 1980, American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.
Suchman, E. A. 1967. Evaluative research. New York; Russell Sage Foundation.
Taylor, J.P. 1974. An administrator’s perspective of evaluation. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University. (Occasional Paper #2).
Thorndike, R.L. 1971. Educational measurement ( 2nd ed. ). Washington, D.C: American Council on Education, 1971.
Webster, W.J. “The Organization and Functions of Research and Evaluation in Large Urban School Districts.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C, March 1975.
Weiss, C Evaluation Research: Methods of Assessing Program Effectiveness, Engle-wood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
Wiley, D.E. and Bock, R.D. Quasi-experimentation in Educational Settings: Comment. The School Review, Winter, 1967, 35 3–66.
Wolf, R.L. “How teachers feel toward evaluation.” In E.R. House (ed.), School evaluation: The Politics and Process. Berkeley: McCutcheon, 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stufflebeam, D.L., Shinkfield, A.J. (1985). An Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Evaluation. In: Systematic Evaluation. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5656-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5656-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8995-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5656-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive