Skip to main content

Structure, Process, and the Labor Market

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 4))

Abstract

In the late 1960s, attention focused on the persistence of poverty and of income differentials on the basis of sex and (especially) race. Neoclassical economic theorists such as Becker (1957) held that such differentials were the results of tastes for discrimination that were uneconomic and, thus, that they would tend to be eroded by the forces of competition. Another branch of standard economic theory, once again led by Becker (1964), held that poverty and racial differentials in income stemmed heavily from differences in human capital. This implied that improved education and training programs should enable poverty and racial differentials to be reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrisani, Paul James. An Empirical Analysis of the Dual Labor Market Theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, Floya. “Women and the Reserve Army of Labour: A Critique of Veronica Beechey.” Capital and Class (Spring, 1980) 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averitt, Robert T. The Dual Economy: The Dynamics of American Industry Structure. New York: Horton, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, Edward C. The Unheavenly City. Boston: Little, Brown, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran, Paul, and Sweezy, Paul. Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, E.M., Horan, Patrick M., and Tolbert, Charles M., II. “Stratification in a Dual Economy: A Sectoral Model of Earnings Determination.” American Sociological Review (October 1978), 704–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • — “Industrial Segmentation and Labor Market Discrimination.” Social Problems (December 1980), 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beechey, Veronica. “Some Notes on Female Wage Labour.” Capital and Class (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Suzanne, and Piore, Michael J. Dualism and Discontinuity in Industrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, Howard. “The Economic Effect of Career Origins.” In Richard C. Edwards, Michael Reich, and David M. Gordon (eds.) Labor Market Segmentation. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1975, 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, Mark. “The Empirical Status of Human Capital Theory: A Slightly Jaundiced Survey.” The Journal of Economic Literature (September 1976), 827–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluestone, Barry. “The Tripartite Economy: Labor Markets and the Working Poor.” Poverty and Human Resources (July/August 1970), 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Characteristics of Marginal Industries.” In David M. Gordon (ed.) Problems in Political Economy: An Urban Perspective. 2d edition. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1977, 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluestone, Barry, Murphy, William M., and Stevenson, Mary. Low Wages and the Working Poor. Ann Arbor: Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borus, Michael E. “Assesing the Impact of Training Programs.” In Eli Ginzberg (ed.) Employing the Unemployed. New York: Basic Books, 1980, 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert. “The Problem with Human Capital Theory — A Marxian Critique.” American Economic Review (May 1975), 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • — “The Marxian Theory of Value and Heterogeneous Labor: A Critique and Reformulation.” Cambridge Journal of Economics (June 1977), 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, Harry. Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Robert. “Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe.” Past and Present (February 1976), 30–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, William P. “Industry Marginality and Female Employment: A New Appraisal.” American Sociological Review (February 1980), 58–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchele, Robert Kent. Jobs and Workers: A Labor Market Segmentation Perspective on the Work Experience of Young Men. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Glen G. “The Challenge of Segmented Labor Market Theories to Orthodox Theory: A Survey.” The Journal of Economic Literature (December 1976), 1215–1257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, Peter B., and Piore, Michael J. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unemployment and the’Dual Labor Market.’” The Public Interest (Winter 1974), 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, G. William. Who Rules America? Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Higher Circles. New York: Random House, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, G. William, and Ballard, Hoyt B. (eds.) C. Wright Mills and The Power Elite. Boston: Beacon Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, John T. Industrial Relations Systems. New York: Holt, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Richard. Contested Terrain. New York: Basic Books, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Richard C., Reich, Michael, and Gordon, David M. (eds.) Labor Market Segmentation. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, J.N. Hegel: A Re-Examination. New York: Oxford University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, Marcia. Labor Markets: Segments and Shelters. Montclair, N.J.: Allanheld, Osmun & Co., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Samuel R. Teamster Rank and File: Power, Bureaucracy, and Rebellion at Work and in a Union. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Samuel R., and Friedman, Judith J. “Class Conflict in a Dual Economy: A Critique of Some Current Theories.” Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagliani, Giorgio. “How Many Working Classes?” American Journal of Sociology (September 1981), 259–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, John Kenneth. The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, Jean. “Women and Unemployment.” Red Rag (1975–1976) as cited in Beechey (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgakas, Dan, and Surkin, Marvin. Detroit: I Do Mind Dying. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geschwender, James A. Class, Race, and Worker Insurgency. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzberg, Eli (ed.) Employing the Unemployed. New York: Basic Books, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, David M. Class, Productivity, and the Ghetto: A Study of Labor Market Stratification. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • — ed.) Problems in Political Economy: An Urban Perspective. 2d edition. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, David M., Edwards, Richard, and Reich, Michael. Segmented Work, Divided Workers: The Historical Transformation of Labor in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Bennett. “Institutions on the Periphery.” In David M. Gordon, (ed.) Problems in Political Economy: An Urban Perspective. 2d edition. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1977, 102–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welfare Payments and the Reproduction of Low-Wage Workers and Secondary Jobs.” Review of Radical Political Economy (Summer 1979), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, Robert M. “On ‘Stratification in a Dual Economy.’” American Sociological Review (August 1980), 702–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. The Logic of Hegel. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Science of Logic. London: Allen and Unwin/Macmillian, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, Randy. “Industrial Structure as a Worker Resource under Corporate Capitalism.” Presented at annual meeting of The Society for the Study of Social Problems, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labor in the Monopoly, Competitive, and State Sectors of Production.” Politics and Society (1978), 429–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, Randy, and Kaufman, Robert L. “Economic Dualism: A Critical Review.” American Sociological Review (December 1982), 727–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C.L.R. Notes on Dialectics: Hegel, Marx, Lenin. Westport, CT: Lawrence Hill & Co., 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, Arne, Wallace, Michael, and Althauser, Robert P. “Economic Segmentation, Worker Power, and Income Inequality.” American Journal of Sociology (November 1981), 651–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Robert L., Hodson, Randy, and Fligstein, Neil D. “Defrocking Dualism: A New Approach to Defining Industrial Sectors.” Social Science Research (March 1981), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Clark. “Labor Markets: Their Character and Consequences.” American Economic Review (May 1950), 278–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Balkanization of Labor Markets.” In E. Wight Bakke et al. (eds.) Labor Mobility and Economic Opportunity. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1954, 92–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, Thomas A., and Block, Richard N. “An Interindustry Analysis of Bargaining Outcomes: Preliminary Evidence from Two-Digit Industries.” Quarterly Journal of Economics (August 1977), 431–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, William J. “An Empirical Study of Labor Market Segmentation: Comment.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review (January 1977), 219–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowell, Ruth Fabricant. “The Dual Labor Market in New York City.” Paper presented at Human Resources Administration’s Welfare Research Conference, New York City, December 1, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGahey, Richard M. Labor Market Segmentation, Human Capital, and the Economics of Crime. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New School for Social Research, New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl. “Conservative Thought.” In Paul Kecskemeti (ed.) Essays on Sociology and Social Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1953, 76–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. Capital, Volume 1. New York: International Publishers, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Stanley H., and Maynard, Rebecca. The Impact of Supported Work on Long-Term Recipients of AFDC Benefits. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, Rebecca. The Impact of Supported Work on Young School Dropouts. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkman, Ruth. “Women’s Work and Economic Crisis: Some Lessons of the Great Depression.” Review of Radical Political Economics (Spring, 1976) as cited in Beechey (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Albert L., and Zeckhauser, R. “Government Comes to the Workplace: An Assessment of OSHA.” The Public Interest (Fall 1977 ), 39–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyden, Philip W., and Nyden, Gwendolyn Evans. “The Illusion of Stable Jobs: The View from Workers in Steel, Auto and Other Core Industries in Recession.” Presented at annual meetings of the Society for the Study of Social Problems, 1981 ‚ 4–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, James. The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, Gerry. “A Factor Analytic Test of the Theory of the Dual Economy.” Review of Economics and Statistics (Febarury 1979), 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, Paul. “An Empirical Study of Labor Market Segmentation.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review (July 1975), 508–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reply.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review (January 1977), 221–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getting Started: The Youth Labor Market. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parenti, Michael. Democracy for the Few. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piliavin, Irving, and Gartner, Rosemary. The Impact of Supported Work on Exoffenders. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, Michael J. “Fragments of a ‘Sociological’ Theory of Wages.” American Economic Review (May 1973), 377–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Notes for a Theory of Labor Market Stratification.” In Richard C. Edwards, Michael Reich, and David M. Gordon (eds.) Labor Market Segmentation. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1975, 125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard. Poor People’s Movements. New York: Vintage Books, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • — The New Class War: Reagan’s Attack on the Welfare State and Its Consequences. New York: Pantheon Books, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Michael, Gordon, David M., and Edwards, Richard C. “A Theory of Labor Market Segmentation.” American Economic Review (May 1973), 359–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Lloyd G. The Structure of Labor Markets. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Sam. The Dual Labor Market: Its Existence and Consequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brandeis University, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Marxian Reserve Army of Labor and the Dual Labor Market.” Politics and Society (1977), 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • — A Survey of Empirical Work on Labor Market Segmentation.” Working Paper No. 138, Institute of Industrial Relations, University of California, Berkeley, Calif., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Male Occupational Standing and the Dual Labor Market,” Industrial Relations (Winter 1980), 34–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • — Occupational Mobility and Short Cycles.” In Frank Wilkinson. The Dynamics of Labor Market Segmentation. New York: Academic Press, 1981, 229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumberger, Russell W., and Carnoy, Martin. “Segmentation in the U.S. Labour Market: Its Effects on Mobility and Earnings of Whites and Blacks.” Cambridge Journal of Economics (June 1980), 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrin, William. The Company and the Union, New York: Vintage Books, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simeral, Margaret. “Women and the Reserve Army of Labor.” Insurgent Sociologist (Fall 1978), 164–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, Natalie J. Between Money and Love: The Dialectics of Women’‘s Home and Market Work. New York: Praeger, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Kathy. “The Origins of Job Structures in the Steel Industry.” Radical America (November/December 1973), 19–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Patricia A., Gwartney-Gibbs, Patricia A., and Farley, Reynolds. “The Changing Structure of Earnings Inequality, 1960–1978.” Paper presented at meetings of the American Sociological Association, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepperman, Jean. Not Servants, Not Machines: Office Workers Speak Out. Boston: Beacon Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, Lester G. Generating Inequality. New York: Basic Books, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, Charles, Horan, Patrick M., and Beck, E.M. “The Structure of Economic Segmentation: A Dual Economy Approach.” American Journal of Sociology (March 1980), 1095–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallas, Steven P. “Marxism and The Labor Process.” Socialist Review (November/ December 1980), 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vietorisz, Thomas, and Harrison, Bennett. “Labor Market Segmentation: Positive Feedback and Divergent Development.” American Economic Review (May 1973), 366–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachter, Michael L. “Primary and Secondary Labor Markets: A Critique of the Dual Approach.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. (3: 1974), 637–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, Stanley Lewis. “Rank-and-File Labor Rebellions Break into the Open: The End of an Era.’’ In Staughton Lynd (ed.) American Labor Radicalism: Testimonies and Interpretations. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1973, 148–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Frank. The Dynamics of Labor Market Segmentation. New York: Academic Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik Olin. Class Structure and Income Determination. New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik Olin, Costello, Cynthia, Hachen, David, and Sprague, Joey. “The American Class Structure.” American Sociological Review (December 1982), 709–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbalist, Andrew (ed.) Case Studies on the Labor Process. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, Lynne G., and Rosenstein, Carolyn. “Taxonomies of Institutional Structure: Dual Economy Reconsidered.” American Sociological Review (December 1981), 869–884.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Friedman, S.R. (1984). Structure, Process, and the Labor Market. In: Darity, W. (eds) Labor Economics: Modern Views. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5636-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5636-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8985-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5636-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics