Skip to main content

Automatic Perimetry in Glaucoma: A Clinical Comparison of Two Computer-Assisted Perimeters (Perimetron and Octopus 2000)

  • Chapter
Sixth International Visual Field Symposium

Part of the book series: Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series ((DOPS,volume 42))

Abstract

Two automatic computerized perimeters (Perimetron and Octopus 2000) were used to test the visual fields of 43 patients (78 eyes) with open-angle glaucoma in various stages of development. A control group of 14 normal subjects (27 eyes) was also taken into consideration.

The sensitivity of the two instruments was good, with high rates of detection of visual field defects. In the test of normal patients, both instruments demonstrated a good specificity, with a low number of false-positive results.

The automatic perimetry results are very closely connected to the type of program used, the criteria adopted for the classification of test results, the gravity of visual field defects and the level of collaboration of the subject examined.

The most important advantages of the Perimetron and Octopus 2000 over manual perimetry are the objectivity and standardization of the test parameters. An improved fixation control device, and some modification of the software would make the two instruments more reliable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fankhauser, F.. Spahr, J. and Bebie, H. Three years of experience with the Octopus automatic perimeter. Doc. Ophthalmol. Proc. Series 14: 7– 15 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heijl, A. and Drance, S.M. A clinical comparison of three computerized automatic perimeters in the detection of glaucoma defects. Arch. Ophthalmol. 99: 832– 836 (1981).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Leuenberger, A.E. Erfahrungen mit dem Praxisperimeter Octopus 2000. Klin. Mbl. Augenheilk 182: 510– 511 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, S.G., Spaeth, G.L., Scimeca, H.A., Schatz, N.J. and Savino, P.J. Clinical experiences with the use of an automated perimeter (Octopus) in the diagnosis and management of patients with glaucoma and neurologic diseases. Ophthalmology 86: 1302– 1312 (1979).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmied, U. Automatic (Octopus) and manual (Goldmann) perimetry in glaucoma. Proc. 1st Int. Meeting on Automated Perimetry System Octopus. Schlieren, Switzerland, Interzeag Publishers, 53 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Spahr, J. Zur Automatisierung der Perimetric: I. Die Anwendung eines computer- gesteuerten Perimeters. Albrecht von Graefes Arch. klin. exp. Ophthalmol. 188: 323– 338 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

A. Heijl E. L. Greve

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brusini, P., Tosoni, C. (1985). Automatic Perimetry in Glaucoma: A Clinical Comparison of Two Computer-Assisted Perimeters (Perimetron and Octopus 2000). In: Heijl, A., Greve, E.L. (eds) Sixth International Visual Field Symposium. Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5512-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5512-7_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8932-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5512-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics