Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Origin and Spontaneity A Comment

  • Chapter
The Kaleidoscope of Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 94))

  • 143 Accesses

Abstract

As a preface to some comments on the philosophical position of the Marburg School, with special emphasis on Hermann Cohen — following the analysis presented by Professor Funkenstein — two topics of an historical and typological character should be briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Hermann Cohen, Logik der reinen Erkenntnis( Hildesheim/New York: Georg Olms Verlag, 1977 ), p. 436.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., pp. 1 Iff.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 329.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hermann Cohen, Der Begriff der Religion im System der Philosophie (Giessen: Alfred Töpelmann), pp. 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paul Natorp, Hermann Cohens philosophische Leistung (Reuther & Reichard, 1918), sums up Cohen’s attitude to Kant.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hermann Cohen, Logik der reinen Erkenntnis (see note 1), p. 480.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid, p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid., p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid., pp. 91-92.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen, Erster Teil (Berlin: Bruno Cassirer, 1923), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., p. 51. Relevant observations as to the difference between Cassirer and Cohen are to be found in Wolfgang Marx “Cassirers Symboltheorie als Entwicklung und Kritik der Neukantischen Grundlagen einer Theorie des Denkens und Erkennens,” 2. Teil, in: Archiv fürGeschichte der Philosophie (1975), Heft 3, pp. 304 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hermann Cohen, Das Princip der Infinitesimal-Methode und seine Geschichte, Ein Kapitel zur Grundlegung der Erkenntniskritik( Berlin: Frd. Dummler, 1883 ), p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Nathan Rotenstreich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Edna Ullmann-Margalit

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rotenstreich, N. (1986). Origin and Spontaneity A Comment. In: Ullmann-Margalit, E. (eds) The Kaleidoscope of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 94. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5496-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5496-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2159-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5496-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation