Skip to main content

Knowledge and Power in the Sciences A Comment

  • Chapter
The Kaleidoscope of Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 94))

  • 142 Accesses

Abstract

Everett Mendelsohn claims that since the late nineteenth century, a combination of factors has transformed scientific knowledge into a form of socially illegitimate and abusive power. According to Mendelsohn, these factors include the tendency of science to serve powerful interests rather than to be neutral; the role of science in magnifying the power of the nation-state and its involvement in modern wars and mass murder; the professionalization of science which has increasingly excluded laymen not only as co-participants in, but even as an audience of, scientific discourse. Finally, science, according to Mendelsohn, has contributed to the substitution of technical training for moral education. He echoes Rousseau’s fear of specialists unrestrained by a comprehensive moral outlook. As such, he observes, the scientists become involved in what George Bernard Shaw called “a grand conspiracy against the laity.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Giovanni Sartori, Democratic Theory( Detroit: Wayne University Press, 1962 ), p. 408.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cited in Keith M. Baker, Condorcet: From National Philosophy to Social Mathematics(Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1975), pp. 75, 79.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Spratt (1667), History of the Royal Society, ed. J. Cope and H.W. Jones (St. Louis: Washington University Press, 1958 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morris Berman, Social Change and Scientific Organization, The Royal Institution1799–1844 ( London: Heinemann, 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edward C. Banfield, The Unheavenly City Revisited(Boston: Little Brown, 1970), pp. 260–286.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Edna Ullmann-Margalit

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ezrahi, Y. (1986). Knowledge and Power in the Sciences A Comment. In: Ullmann-Margalit, E. (eds) The Kaleidoscope of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 94. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5496-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5496-0_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2159-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5496-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics