Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 29))

  • 207 Accesses

Abstract

F.H. Bradley may well have been the last major philosopher to acknowledge that relations, in their own right, pose an authentic metaphysical problem. Near the beginning of Appearance and Reality (p. 21) he gives this problem a memorably pessimistic formulation:

Relation presupposes quality, and quality relation. Each can be something neither together with, nor apart from, the other; and the vicious circle in which they turn is not the truth about reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

Secondary Sources

  • Bradley, F.H., Appearance and Reality Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1968. Reprint of Oxford, 1893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, E., Eine neue Darstellung der Leibnizischen Monadenlehre Leipzig: Reisland, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, E.R., Select Passages Illustrating Neoplatonism Chicago: Ares, 1979. Reprint of London, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J., “Perceptions and Relations in the Monadology” Studia Leibnitiana 9 (1977) pp. 212–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishiguro, Hidé, “Pre-established Harmony versus Constant Conjunction” Proceedings of the British Academy vol. LXIII (1977) pp. 239–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulstad, M., “Leibniz’s Conception of Expression” in Studia Leibnitiana 9 (1977) pp. 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahnke, D., Unendliche Sphäre und Allmittelpunkt Stuttgart-Bad Cann-Stadt: Frommann, 1966. Reprint of Halle, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRae, R., Leibniz: Perception, Apperception and Thought Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • II: R. McRae: “Time and the Monad” Nature and System I (1979) pp. 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B., Principles of Mathematics New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, L.J., “The Correspondence between Leibniz and de Voider: in Leibniz: Metaphysics and Philosophy of Science ed. R.S. Woolhouse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981. pp. 104–118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hunter, G. (1985). Monadic Relations. In: Okruhlik, K., Brown, J.R. (eds) The Natural Philosophy of Leibniz. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5490-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5490-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8923-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5490-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics