Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Series on Microprocessor-Based Systems Engineering ((ISCA,volume 3))

  • 219 Accesses

Abstract

The design engineer’s challenge in medical electronics field is to create an instrument that utilizes state-of-the-art technology and also allows the non-technical user to efficiently interface with the instrument. The biomedical instrument must accurately monitor, calculate and alarm on patients’ physiological parameters. These parameters should be displayed in a clear, concise manner.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Cited References

  1. M.Kern, “Interfacing the Hospital-HP 78502 Central Station,” in Proceedings of Wescon/81-Electronic Show and Convention, pp.11/3.1–11/ 3.3, San Francisco, CA, September 15–17, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.K. Jurgen, “Electronics in Medicine,” IEEE Spectrum, pp. 76–80, January 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. U. Faust, “Implication and Use of Microelectronics in Medicine and Biology,” EUROCON’ 80: From Electronics to Microelectronics, pp.525–528, Stuttgart, Germany, March 24–28, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W.M.C. Sansen, “On the Integration of an Internal Human Conditioning System,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol.SC-17, No. 3, pp. 513–521, June 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Snigier and W. Sniger, “Medical Applications for System Design,” Digital Design, p. 44, February 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.K. Jurgen, “Electronics in Medicine,” IEEE Spectrum, pp. 81–86, January 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B.P.T. Ostermann, “Home Care System,” 4th World Telecoriurrunication Forum, Geneva, November 1, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Pelham, “Dual-Processor Microcontrollers Ease Intermodule Communications,” EDN, p.227, March 8, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.M. Rueter, “Multi-Processor Architecture and Communications for Patient Monitoring,” Hewlett-Packard Journal, pp. 15–18, November 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.F. Shackil,“Microprocessors and the M.D.,” IEEE Spectrum, pp.45–49, April 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P.I. Bennett and V.C. Jones, “Portable Defibrillator-Monitor for Cardiac Resuscitation,” Hewlett-Packard Journal, pp. 21–28, February 1982.

    Google Scholar 

General References

  • A. Santoni and B. Peterson, “Acting as an Electronic Lens, CCD Array Helps Scan the Human Body Ultrasonically,” EDN, p.57, September 20, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Berkman, “Biomedical Microprocessor With Analog I/O,” ISSCC/1981, N.Y., February 18–20, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Schoenfeld, at al., “The Microprocessor in the Biological Laboratory,” Computer, p.56, May 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Barker, “Will I/O Biochips Create Computer Peripherals Revolution?” Digital Design, p 18, December 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.J. Zsombor-Murray, et al., “A Miniature Recording Cardiotachometer,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics and Control Instrumentation, Vol. IECI-28, No. 2, pp. 90–97, May 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Davis and A. Berman, “Advanced Data Acquisition Aids The Handicap-ped,”Computer Design, p.21, June 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Horgan, “Medical Electronics,” IEEE Spectrum, pp.89–93, January 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.F. Swisher, “Coordination a Multicenter Trial Using a Microprocessor-Based Clinical Research Data Acquisition,” in IEEE 1983 Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, pp. 728–730, Baltimore, MD, Oct. 23–26, 1983.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • D. H. Wallace, “Microcomputer Applications in Self-Help Healthcare,” in Proceedings of 1984 Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, pp. 901–907, Washington, D.C., Nov. 4–7, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Dolcourt and S. Younger, “Microprocessor-Based Breathing Rate Variability Monitor for Newborn Infants,” in Proceedings of 1984 Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Washington, D.C., Nov. 4–7, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.O. Wist, et al., “Personalized Information Interfaces for Scientific Investigators,” in Proceedings of 1984 Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Washington, D.C., Nov. 4–7, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Horgan, “Medical Electronics,” IEEE Spectrum, pp.89–94, January 1985

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Georgopoulos, C.J. (1985). μP Interfaces in Medical Applications. In: Interface Fundamentals in Microprocessor-Controlled Systems. International Series on Microprocessor-Based Systems Engineering, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5470-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5470-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8915-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5470-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics