Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nuclear Energy

  • Chapter
Geographical Dimensions of Energy

Part of the book series: The GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 5))

Abstract

There has been much recent interest in nuclear power by geographers, reflecting the attention focused upon it by general public. Public attitudes, socioeconomic impacts, risk, equity considerations and waste transport and disposal are primary areas of attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, M.G. 1971. A computer based model for nuclear power station site selection. Area 3: 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, M. 1977. Energy and form: The Windscale file. Town and country planning November: 469–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, M 1979. The meaning of Windscale. Town and country planning June: 295–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E.L., West, S.G., Moss, D.J., and Weyant, J.M. 1980. Impact of offshore nuclear power plants: Forecasting visits to nearby beaches. Environment and Behavior 12: 367–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, P., and Pijawka, K.D. 1981. The socioeconomic impacts of nuclear generating stations: An analysis of the Rancho Seco and Peach Bottom facilities. GeoJournal Supplementary Issue 3: 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, M.J., and Robinson, M.E. 1981a. French nuclear energy policy. Geography 66: 300–03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, M.J., and Robinson, M.E 1981b. Plogoff says no to nuclear power. Geographical Magazine 53: 681–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, M.J., and Robinson, M.E. 1982. A further note on French nuclear energy. Geography 67: 148–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, M.J., Johnson, J.R., Jr., and McGirr, B.J. 1980. Locational conflict and attitudes regarding the burial of nuclear wastes. East Lakes Geographer 15: 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, M.J., S., Johnson, J.R., Jr. and Ziegler, D. 1979. Final report in social survey of Three Mile Island area residents. East Lansing, MI Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, J.D., Pijawka, K.D., Branch, D., Bergmann, P., Flynn, J., and Flynn, C. 1982. Socioeconomic impacts of nuclear generating stations: summary report on the NRC post-licensing studies. NUREG/CR-2750. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E. 1971. Ionizing radiation. In Environment: Resources, pollution and society ed. W.W. Murdoch, pp. 254–278. Stamford, Connecticut: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E. 1975. Ionizing radiation. In Environment (2nd ed.), ed. W.W. Murdoch, pp. 297–323. Sunderland (Massachusetts), Sinauer Associate

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E. 1980. The role of history in the regulation of the nuclear-fuel cycle. In Uranium mine waste disposal, ed. CO. Browner, pp. 5–10. New York: Society of Mining Engineers of AIME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E 1982. The role of history in acceptance of nuclear power. Social Science Quarterly 63: 3–15. Reprinted in Nuclear power: assessing and managing hazardous technology, ed. M.J. Pasqualetti an K.D. Pijawka, Ch. 2. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. 1984. Residential proximity and cognition of risk at Three Mile Island: Implications for evacuation planning. In Nuclear power: Assessing and managing hazardous technology, ed. M.J. Pasqualetti and K.D. Pijawka, pp. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. and Barnes, K. 1982. Evacuation behavior and Three Mile Island. Disasters: The International Journal of Disaster Studies and Practice 6: 116–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, J.E. 1984. Introduction to Section II-Spatial Assessments and Impact Mitigation. In Nuclear power: Assessing and managing hazardous technology, ed. M.J. Pasqualetti and K.D. Pijawka, pp. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, W. 1965. The nuclear age in Canada. Canadian Geographical Journal 71: 182–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre, S.R. 1978. Nuclear power and nuclear waste. Progress in Physical Geography 2: 151–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernie, J. 1980. Nuclear power: Salvation or damnation? In A geography of energy in the United Kingdon, pp. 77–104. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernie, J. and S. Openshaw. 1984. Decision-making and safety issues of nuclear power development in the United Kingdom. In Nuclear power: Assessing and managing hazardous technology, ed. M.J. Pasqualetti and K.D. Pijawka, Ch. 3. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosberg, F.R. 1963. Effects of nuclear explosions on vegetation. Geographical Review 53: 136–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M.K., Krueckeberg, D. and Kaltman, M. 1984. Population trends around nuclear power plants. In Nuclear power: Assessing and Managing hazardous technology, ed. M.J. Pasqualetti, and K.D. Pijawka, Boulder, Ch. 8. Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, D.H. 1975. The nuclear power industry in Europe. Energia Nucleare 22: 320–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiness, P. 1979. Nuclear power and the American energy crisis. Geography 64: 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiness, P. 1980. The changing location of power plants in California. Geography 65: 217–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyol, N. 1958. Nuclear fuels in the pattern of world energy supplies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 48 266–267 (abs.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. 1977. Windscale: the TCPA case. Town and country planning. December: 517–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. 1978. Windscale inquiry report. Town and country planning. May: 246–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. 1979. The nuclear fallacy. Town and country planning. August: 148–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, T. 1977. The Windscale inquiry. Town and country planning. October: 451–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, F.K. 1978. Nuclear waste and the hydrologic cycle. Bulletin of the American Meterological Society 59: 267–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, F.K. and Aikin, A.M. 1980. Nuclear waste disposal: Technology and environmental hazards. In Nuclear energy and the environment, ed. E.E. El Hinnawi, pp. 168–199. Oxford: Pergamon. Reprinted in Nuclear power: Assessing and managing hazardous technology, ed. M.J. Pasqualetti and K.D. Pijawka, Boulder, Ch. 13. Colorado: Westview Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J.F. 1956. Nucleo-electricity versus carbo-electricity in Britain. Geographical Review 46: 116–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, W.N. 1962. New horizons in resource development: The role of nuclear explosions. Geographical Review 52: 1–24, January.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D., Pierce, B.L. Metz, W.C. et al. 1982. Management of high-level waste repository siting. Science 218: 859–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, G.W. 1957. The role of nuclear power in Europe’s future energy balance. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 47: 15–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohenemser, C., R.E. Kasperson, and R.W. Kates. 1977. The distrust of nuclear power. Science 196: 25–34. Reprinted with a postscript in R.W. Kates, C. Hohenemser, and J.X. Kasperson, eds. Perilous progress: Technology as hazard, pp.. Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilbery, B.W. 1981a. The diffusion of nuclear power in Europe. Geography 66: 297–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilbery, B.W. 1981b. Nuclear power in western Europe. Tijdschrift voor Econ. En. Soc. Geografie 72: 242–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, P. 1979. Nuclear energy and planning. Town and country planning August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Jr., J.H. and Zeigler, D. 1984. A spatial analysis of evacuation intentions: Implications for radiological emergency response planning. In Nuclear power: Assessing and managing hazardous technology, ed. M.J. Pasqualetti and K.D. Pijawka, pp Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S.B. 1951. The economic geography of atomic energy. Economic Geography 27: 268–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E. 1977. Nuclear waste management and the public: Considerations for public policy. Testimony presented to the California Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, 26 May 1977. (Available from Center for Technology, Environment, and Development, Clark University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E. 1980. Anticipating the socioeconomic impacts of nuclear waste facilities upon rural communities. In U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, Subcommittee on Rural Development. Hearings on the socioeconomic effects of a nuclear waste storage site on rural areas and small communities, 96th Congress, 2nd Session. Washington, D.C. pp. 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E. 1982. Societal response to Three Mile Island and the Kemeny Commission Report. In The risk analysis controversy: An institutional perspective, ed. H.C. Kunreuther and E.V. Ley, pp. 61–77. Berlin, West Germany: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E. 1983a. Editor. Equity Issues in Radioactive Waste Management. Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschalger, Gunn & Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E. 1983b. Social issues in radioactive waste management: The national experience. In Equity issues in radioactive waste management. R.E. Kasperson, ed. pp 24–65. Cambridge, Mass: Oelgeschalger, Gunn & Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E., an Lundbland, J. 1982. Closing the protection gap: setting health standards for nuclear power workers. Environment 24: 14–20, 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E. and Morrison, M. 1983. Value conflict in the nuclear controversy. In The nuclear power controversy, ed. H.T. Engelhardt and A. Caplan, New York Plenum Press (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E. and Rubin, B. 1983. Siting a radioactive waste repository: What role for equity? In Equity issues in radioactive waste management, ed. R.E. Kasperson, pp.118–36 Cambridge, Mass: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E., with Derr, P., and Kates, R.W. 1984. Confronting equity in radioactive waste management: modest proposals for a socially just and acceptable program. In Equity issues in radioactive waste management, ed. R.E. Kasperson, pp. 331–68. Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E., Berk, G., Pijawka, K.D., Sharaf, A.B., and Wood, J. 1980. Public opposition to nuclear energy: Retrospect and prospect. National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Nuclear Energy and its Alternatives: Sociopolitical impacts of energy use and policy, ed. C.T. Unseld, D.E. Morrison, and D.L. Sills, eds. Revised and updated versions reprinted in Science, technology, and human values 5 (Spring): 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E., Hohenemser, C.J., Kasperson, J.X. and Kates, R.W. 1982. Institutional responses to different perceptions of risks. In Accident at Three Mile Island: The human dimensions ed. D. Sills, C. Wolf, and V.B. Shelanski, pp. 39–46. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R.W. 1977. Assessing the assessors: The art and ideology or risk assessment. Ambio VI(5): 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R.W. 1978. Case study: Risk assessment of nuclear reactors: Three views of the reactor safety study. In Risk assessment of environmental Hazard, ed. R.W. Kates, pp. 87–97. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R.W, Hohenemser, C, and Kasperson, J.E., eds. 1983. Perilous progress: Technology as hazard. Cambridge, Mass: Oelgeschalger, Gunn & Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luten, D.B. 1979. Who owns the atom? Landscape 23: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, P.F. 1971. Some environmental considerations in the siting of nuclear power reactors along the California coast. Geography 56: 335–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, P.F. 1972a. Rejoinder to comments on “Spatial variability of atmospheric radioactivity in the United States.” Professional Geographer 24: 272–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, P.F. 1972b. Some spatial implications of a massive industrial accident: The case of nuclear power plants. Professional Geographer 24: 233–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J.R. 1980. Environmental hazard and political response: Nuclear sites as a focus of ecologic protest in France. Paper presented at the 76th Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Lousiville.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, H. 1972. Heavy water: The critical element in Canada’s nuclear programme. Canadian Geographical Journal 85: 238–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieson, R.S. 1980. Nuclear power in the Soviet Bloc. Annals, of the Association of American Geographers 760: 271–279, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, W.C. 1978. Predicting the population influx which accompanies a nuclear power plant. Nuclear News 21: 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, W.C. 1979. Eastern nuclear power plant information centers. Electrical World (Dec. 27).

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, W.C. 1980. Eastern nuclear power plant information centers. Electrical World 193: 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, W.C. 1982a. Legal constraints to high-level radioactive waste repository siting. Impact Assessment Bulletin 1: 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, W.C. 1982b. Legal constraints to siting. In Nuclear waste: Socioeconomic dimensions of long-term storage, ed. Steve Murdoch, F. Larry Leistritiz, and Rita R. Hamm, pp. 73–90, Denver: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, W.C., Daum, M.L., Pearlman, K.T., and Waite, N.C. 1984. Nuclear energy and land use. In Nuclear power: Assessing and managing hazardous technology, ed. M.J. Pasqueletti and K.D. Pijawka, pp. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowll, J.U. 1958a. Applications of atomic energy. Geographical Review 48: 278–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowll, J.U. 1958b. Prospects for nuclear power in Canadian mineral industries. Canadian Geographer 11: 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S. 1980. A geographical appraisal of nuclear reactor sites. Area 12: 287–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowll, J.U. 1982a. The geography of reactor siting policies in the U.K. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers N.S. 7: 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowll, J.U. 1982b. The siting of nuclear power stations and public safety in the UK. Regional Studies 16: 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowll, J.U. and Taylor, P. 1981. U.K. reactor siting policy: Memorandum by the Political Ecology Research Group, in first report of the house of Commons Select Committee on Energy 1980–1: Minutes of evidence. 3: 990–1018. HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. 1978. Environmental issues: I environmental issues and the political agenda: Nuclear power. Progress in Physical Geography 2: 494–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. 1979. Environmental issues: II Lessons from a nuclear accident. Progress in Physical Geography 3: 573–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. 1984a. Introduction to section IV — Risk perception and emergency planning. In Nuclear power: Assessing and managing hazardous technology, ed. M.J. Pasqualetti, and K.D. Pijawka, pp. 239–246. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. 1984b. The Sizewell B Inquiry and a National Energy Strategy. The Geographical Journal, July. 152: 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. 1983a. Nuclear energy: The place of geography. Paper presented at the 79th Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Denver, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. 1983b. Nuclear power impacts: A convergence/divergence schema. Professional geographer and K.D. Pijawka.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. 1984b. The decommissioning dilemma. Sierra, Sept/Oct. 69: 64–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. and Pijawka, K.D. 1984. Nuclear power; Assessing and managing hazarouds technology, Boudler, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearch, D. 1979. Planning and the Windscale inquiry. Town and country planning: April, pp. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijawka, K.D. 1981. The socioeconomic impacts of nuclear generating stationa: Analysis of Rancho Seco and Pearch Bottom Facilities. GeoJournal Supp. 3: 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. Pijawka, K.D., 1982. Public response to the Diablo Canyon nuclear generating plant. Energy, The International Journal 7: 667–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. 1984. Public sector effects and social impact assessment of nuclear generating plants. In Nuclear power: Assessing and managing hazardous technology, eds. M.J. Pasqualetti, pp 171–188. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryde, P.R. 1978. Nuclear energy development in the Soviet Union. Soviet Geography: Review and Translation 19: 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryde, P.R. 1979a. Nuclear power. In The Societ Energy System, ed. L. Dienes and T. Shabad, pp. 151–170. Washington, D.C.: U.H. Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryde, P.R. 1979b. Nuclear energy in the Soviet Union. Current History, 77: 115–18, 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryde, P.R. 1983. Nonconventional energy resources. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryde, P.R. and Pryde, L.T. 1974. Soviet nuclear power. Environment 16: 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks, H. 1979. Soviet nuclear energy without restraint. Geographical Magazine 52: 1,3,5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richetto, J.P. 1978. A locational strategy for the siting of electric energy facilities. Public Utilities Fortnightly 101: 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryde, P.R. 1980. The environment as a factor for locating nuclear electrical facilities in the United States, Geografiska Annaler B62: 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richetto, J. 1984, Locating nuclear electric energy facilities in the United States: A note on structural relationships and the environment. In Nuclear power: Assessing and managing hazardous technology, ed. M.J. Pasqualetti and K.D. Pijawka, pp. 103–120. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. 1980. Nuclear confrontation. Town and country planning: March, 91–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semple, R.K. and Richetto, J.P. 1976. Locational trends of an experi mental public facility: The case of nuclear power plants. Professional Geographer 28: 249–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryde, P.R. 1979. The location of electric generating facilities: Conflict, coalition and power. Regional Science Perspectives 9: 117–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, B.D. 1982. U.S. nuclear energy policy: Provision of funds for decommissioning. Energy Policy 10: 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryde, P.R. 1984. Nuclear power plant decommissioning. In Nuclear power: Assessing and managing hazardous technology, ed. M.J. Pasqualetti and K.D. Pijawka, pp. 387–412. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryde, P.R. Haynes, K.E. and Krmenec, A.J. 1980. A multiobjective power plant location model with hierarchical screening: Nuclear power in northern Indiana. Review of Regional Studies 10: 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, J. 1984. Evaluating the effectivness of warning systems for nuclear power plant emergencies: Criteria and application. In Nuclear power: Assessing and managing hazardous technology ed. M.J. Pasqualetti and K.D. Pijawka, pp. 259–278. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soumagne, J. 1973. Problems geographiques de l’Energre nucleaire en France. L’Information Geographique 37: 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T.M. 1969. Subterranean nuclear explosions—future tools in minerai exploitation? Paper presented at 1968–9 Annual Conference of the Institute of British Geographers, London, (Abs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbanks, T. 1984. Scale and acceptability of nuclear energy. In Nuclear power: Assessing and managing hazardous technology, ed. M.J. Pasqualetti and K.D. Pijawka, pp. 9–50. Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, J. 1977. Evacuation from the nuclear accident. In Geographical Horizons, ed. J. Odland and R.N. Taaffee, pp. 124–29. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, J. 1980. The dignity of risk. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers 5: 391–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeigler, D.J., Brunn, S.D., and Johnson, J.H. Jr. 1981. Evacuation from a nuclear technological disaster. The Geographical Review 71: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelinsky, W. 1984. Introduction to section I — Acceptability and national response to the risks of nuclear power. In Nuclear power: Assessing and managing hazardous technology, ed. M.J. Pasqualetti and K.D. Pijawka, pp. 1–8. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287, USA

    Martin Pasqualetti

Authors
  1. Martin Pasqualetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology and Geography and Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, USA

    Frank J. Calzonetti

  2. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., USA

    Frank J. Calzonetti  & Barry D. Solomon  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pasqualetti, M. (1985). Nuclear Energy. In: Calzonetti, F.J., Solomon, B.D. (eds) Geographical Dimensions of Energy. The GeoJournal Library, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5416-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5416-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8890-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5416-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation