Skip to main content

Analysis as a Method of Discovery During the Scientific Revolution

  • Chapter
A Portrait of Twenty-five Years

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS))

Abstract

This conference addresses the philosophical problem: Is there a logic of discovery? My paper deals with the following historical problems: Did scientists at the time of the Scientific Revolution believe there was a logic of discovery? If so, what was it? How, if at all, did it influence their scientific practice?

An earlier version of this paper was read at the Pittsburgh Colloquium in the History and Philosophy of Science, April 7, 1976.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Arnould, Antoine: 1662, The Art of Thinking: Port-Royal Logic. Page references are to the English translation, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis: 1620, The New Organon. References are to the English translation from the Latin, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, A. C.: 1953, Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science: 1100–1700, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, S. E.: 1950, ‘Resolution and Composition in Speculative and Practical Discourse’, Laval Thtologique et PhUosophique VI, 9–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen: 1969, On the Parts of Medicine, Malcolm Lyons (trans.), Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassendi, Pierre: 1658, The Syntagma: Logic, English edition, Johnson Reprint Co., New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. W.: 1960, Renaissance Concepts of Method, Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. R. and M. B.: 1962, Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, Callaghan & Co., Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J., and U. Remes: 1974, The Method of Analysis: Its Geometrical Origin and Its General Significance, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juncker, J.: 1757, Élémens de Chymie, French translation by Demachy from 2nd Latin edition, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoisier, A-L.: 1789, Elements of Chemistry, Kerr (trans.), Dover, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leicester, H. M., and H. S. Klickstein: 1952, A Source Book in Chemistry: 1400–1900, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macquer, P. J.: 1751, Elements of the Theory and Practice of Chemistry, trans, from 2nd French edition by Reid, London, 1764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macquer, P. J.: 1766, Dictionnaire de Chymie, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac: 1684, Universal Arithmetick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac: 1730, Opticks, 4th edition, reprinted by Dover, New York, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G.: 1945, How to Solve It, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, J. H.: 1962, The Career of Philosophy, Vol. I: From the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment, Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regis, L. M.: 1948, ‘Analyse et synthèse dans l’oeuvre de Saint Thomas’, Studia Mediaevalia, pp. 303–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. E.: 1716, Traité du Soufre, trans, by d’Holbach from 1716 German edition, Paris, 1766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. E.: 1723, Traité des Sels, trans, by d’Holbach from 1723 German edition, Paris, 1771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabó, A. K.: 1974. K.: 1974, ‘Working Backwards and Proving by Synthesis’, Appendix I to Hintikka and Remes (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, William A.: 1959, The Scientific Methodology of Theodoric of Freiberg, The University Press, Friberg, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koertge, N. (1980). Analysis as a Method of Discovery During the Scientific Revolution. In: Cohen, R.S., Wartofsky, M.W. (eds) A Portrait of Twenty-five Years. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5345-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5345-1_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1971-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5345-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics