Abstract
My main object in this paper will be to try to show that there is a large area of agreement between a Kantian ethical theory and the teleological ethical theories which, primarily in the Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals, he so strongly opposed. The manner in which I shall do this is by showing that Kant’s criticism of teleological theories in general does not apply to utilitarianism, the most influential teleological ethical theory. The reason for proceeding in this way is that Kant himself seldom if ever says anything about utilitarianism. It may be that he was not familiar with a sufficiently evolved form of utilitarianism for him clearly to have considered it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harrison, J. (1985). Utilitarianism, Universalization, Heteronomy and Necessity or Unkantian Ethics. In: Potter, N.T., Timmons, M. (eds) Morality and Universality. Theory and Decision Library, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5285-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5285-0_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8834-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5285-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive