Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASIC,volume 143))

  • 276 Accesses

Abstract

This tutorial paper discusses radar imagery from several viewpoints. Various processing tasks of radar data and imagery data are briefly discussed. Some of the main properties of radar images are pointed out and the differences between optical and radar imagery are discussed. The problem of image quality is reviewed with reference to works in optical and radar imagery. Computer processing of radar imagery is considered and various tasks like image encoding and enhancement, rectification and feature processing are briefly commented, using examples from radar. Finally, computer analysis of imagery in general and radar imagery in particular is discussed and the limitation of pattern recognition methodology for image analysis is pointed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Orhaug, T. 1978: Pattern Recognition with special Emphasis on Image Processing, in Lund. T. (Editor): Surveillance of Environmental Pollution and Resources by Electromagnetic Waves, Proc. of NATO Adv. Study Institute, Spatind, Norway, April 1978, Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett, I.R., McConnell, P.R. 1981: Considerations in the design of optimal multilook processors for image quality, in SAR Image Quality, ESA SP-172, ESA 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell, R.M., Marder, S. 1981: Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) image quality considerations, SPIE vol. 310 Image Quality,, pp 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Granger, E., Cupery, K. 1972: An optical merit function (SQF) which correlates with subjective image judgements, Photographic Science and Engineering, Vol., 16, No. 23, pp 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charman, W.N., Olin, A. 1965: Image quality criteria for aerial camera systems, Photographic Science and Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Snyder, H.L. 1973: Image quality and observer performance, in Perception of displayed information, Editor: Biberman, L.M. Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marmolin, H., Nyberg, S. 1975: Multidimensional scaling of image quality, FOA report C 30039-H9 also in Proc. Second International Joint Conference on Pattern Recognition, August 1974, Copenhagen, Denmark, IEEE Catalog number 74CH0885-4C, pp 366–367.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scott, F., HoIIanda, P.A,, Harabedian, A. 1970: The Informative Value of Sampled Images as Function of the Number of Scans per Scene Object, Photographic Science and Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Linde, L., Marmolin, H., Nyberg, S. 1981: Visual effects of sampling in digital picture processing, IEEE Trans., Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-11, No. 3, pp 201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arguello, R.J., Kessler, H.B., Sellner, H.R. 1981: Effect of sampling, optical transfer function shape and anisotropy on subjective image quality, SPIE Vol. 310, Image Quality, pp 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell, R.L. 1974: Models of Extended Targets and their Coherent Radar Images, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 62, No 6. pp 754–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ford, J.P. 1982: Resolution Versus Speckles Relative to Geological Interpretability of Spaceborne Radar Images: A Survey of User Preference, IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. GE-20, No. 4, pp 434–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore, R. K. 1979: Tradeoff Between Picture Element Dimension and Noncoherent Averaging in Side-Looking Airborne Radar, IEEE Trans. Aero-Space and Electronic Systems, vol. AES-15, No. 5, pp 697–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stiles, J.A., Frost, V.S., Holtzman, J.C., Shanugan, K.S. 1981: The Recognition of Extended Targets: SAR Images for Level and Hilly Terrain, I EEE Trans. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. GE-20, No. 2, pp 205–21 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blom, R.G., Daily, M. 1982: Radar Image Processing for Rock-Type Discrimination, I EEE Trans, on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. GE-20, No. 3, pp 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guindon, B., Goodenough, D.G., Teillet, P.M. 1982: The Role of Digital Terrain Models in the Remote Sensing of Forests, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 8, No. 1, pp 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wong, R.Y. 1979: Radar to Optical Scene Matching, SPIE vol. 186, Digital Processing of Aerial Images, pp 108–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shanugan, K.S., Narayanan, V., Frost, V.C., Stiles, J.A., Holtzman, J. C. 1981: Textural Features for Radar I mage Analysis, IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. GE-19, pp 153–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Frost, V.S., Stiles, J.A., Shanmugan, K.S., Holtzman, J.C., Smith, S.A. 1 981: An adaptive Filter for Smoothing Noisy Radar Images, Proc. IEEE, vol. 69, No. 1, pp 133–135.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, J.S. 1981: Speckle Analysis and Smoothing of Synthetic Aperture Radar Images, Computer Graphics and Image Processing, vol. 17, pp 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Justusson, B. 1981: Median Filtering: Statistical Properties, Chapter 5 in Huang, T.S. (Editor): Two Dimensional Digital Signal Processing II, Topics in Applied Physics, vol. 43, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, J-S. 1983: A Simple Speckle Smoothing Algorithm for Synthetic Aperture Radar Images, IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-13, No. 1, pp 85–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jasani, B. 1982: Outer Space - A New Dimension of the Arms Race, chapter 4, p 47.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Boerner, W-M., Ho, C-M., Foo, B-Y. 1981: Use of Radon’s Projection Theory in Electromagnetic Inverse Scattering, I EEE Trans. on Antennas and Propagation, vol. AP-20, No. 2, pp 336–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gjessing, D.T., Hjelmstad, J., Lund, T. 1982: A Multi- frequency Adaptive Radar for Detection and Identification of Objects: Results on Preliminary Experiments on Aircraft a gainst Sea-Clutter Background, I EEE Trans, on Antennas and Propagation, vol. AP-30, No. 3, pp 351–365.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ezquerra, N.F., Harkness, L.L. 1981: Recogntion Applications in Radar Data Processing, IEEE 0360-8913/81/0000-0024, pp 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barrow, H.G., Tenenbaum, J.T. 1981: Computational Vision, Proc. IEEE, vol. 69, No. 5, pp 572–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, S., Elliott, D.B., Campbell, J.B., Erich, R.N., Haralick, R.M. 1983: Spatial Reasoning in Remotely Sensed Data, I EEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. GE-21, No. 1, pp 94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Drazowich, R.J., Lanzirnger, T.X. 1981: Radar Target Classification, IEEE, CH 1595-8/81/0000/0496, pp 496–501.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Orhaug, T. (1985). Radar Imagery. In: Boerner, WM., et al. Inverse Methods in Electromagnetic Imaging. NATO ASI Series, vol 143. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5271-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5271-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8828-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5271-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics