Skip to main content

Electrical Phenomena

  • Chapter
The Relativistic Deduction

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 83))

  • 113 Accesses

Abstract

In the final form Einstein gave it, relativity theory, as we have said, embraces all the phenomena attributed to gravitational action. On the other hand, it completely leaves aside everything having to do with the action of electricity. But perhaps further clarification is needed to prevent any possible misunderstanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • Jean Becquerel, Le principe de la relativité et la Théorie de la gravitation (Paris, 1922), p. 35. Emile Borel (ET 170; Eng. 143) states that “the most complete proof .. . of the theory [of relativity] results from the study of the laws of electrodynamics as a whole, and from the fact that the system of equations governing these laws is invariant for the group of Lorentz transformations” [the bracketed insertion is Meyerson’s]. Weyl points out that “in treating electrodynamics after the manner of Maxwell, one was already unconsciously treading in the steps of the principle of relativity” (STM 205). Moreover, this physicist goes further, writing: “We have ... a good right to claim that the whole fund of experience which is crystallised in Maxwell’s Theory weighs in favor of the world-metrical nature of electricity” (STM 284), that is to say, in favor of the concepts developed by Weyl himself.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucien Fabre’s Une nouvelle figure du monde: Les théories d’Einstein (Paris, 1921, p. 93 ff.) contains a lucid account in nonmathematical language of the relationships between the theories of Fresnel, Faraday, Maxwell, Hertz, and Lorentz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georges Cuvier, ’Histoire des progrés des sciences naturelles’ in OEuvres complétes deBuffon, Complément (Paris, 1862), 1:2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henri Poincaré, Electricité et optique (Paris, 1901), p. 3 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, Raum, Zeit, Materie, preface to 3rd ed., reproduced in the 4th, but omitted in the [French] translations [STM x–xi].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meyerson, É. (1985). Electrical Phenomena. In: The Relativistic Deduction. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 83. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5211-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5211-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8805-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5211-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics