Skip to main content

Constructional Morphology: The Analysis of Constraints in Evolution Dedicated to A. Seilacher in Honour of His 60. Birthday

  • Chapter
Architecture in Living Structure

Abstract

Evolutionary change is opportunistic, but its course is strongly constrained in several fundamental ways. These constraints (historical/ phylogenetic, functional/adaptive, constructional/morphogenetic) and their dynamic relationships are discussed here and shown to constitute the conceptual framework of Constructional Morphology. Notwithstanding recent published opinions which claim that the “discovery” of constraints renders Neodarwinian selection theory obsolete, we regard the insights of Constructional Morphology as being entirely consistent with this theory. As is shown here in the case of the Hyracoidea, formal analysis of the constraints which have framed the evolution of various characters extends our understanding of the evolution of a taxon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberch, P. (1980). Ontogenesis and morphological diversification.— Amer Zool 20: 653–667.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bock, W.J. (1959). Preadaptation and multiple evolutionary pathways.— Evolution 13: 194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bock, W.J., and v. Wahlert, C. (1965). Adaptation and the form—function complex.— Evolution 19: 269–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Böker, H. (1931). Beobachtungen und Untersuchungen zur Umwandlung der Arten an brasilianischen Meerschweinchen (Caviidae) und afrikanischen Klippschliefern (Hyracoidea).— Forsch Fortschr 7 (14): 203–204.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonner, J.T. (1982). Evolution and development. — Berlin: Springer- Verlag, 357 p.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brady, R.H. (1979). Natural selection and the criteria by which a theory is judged.— Syst Zool 28: 600–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cain, A.J. (1964). The perfection of animals.— In J.D. Carthy and C. Duddington, eds., Viewpoints in biology 3, 36–63. London.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Czihak, G. (1957/58). Hermann Weber.–Zool Jahrb Abt Anat Ontog Tiere 76: III–IV.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Darwin, Ch. (1859). The origin of species.— London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dobzhansky, Th., Ayala, F.J., Stebbins, G.L., and Valentine, J.K. (1977). Evolution.–San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company, 572 p.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dullemeijer, P. (1958). The mutual structural influence of the elements in a pattern.— Arch Neerl Zool 13 suppl.: 174–188.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dullerne ijer, P. (1959). A comparative functional-anatomical study of the heads of some Viperidae.— Morph Jb 99: 881–985.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dullemeijer, P. (1974). Concepts and approaches in animal morphology.— Assen: Van Gorcum, 264 p.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dullemeijer, P. (1980). Functional morphology and evolutionary biology.— Acta biotheor 29: 151–250.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fischer, M.S. (1983). Die Extremitätenmuskulatur der Hyracoidea. Beiträge zur Fortbewegung und Anpassungsgeschichte.— Unpublished Diploma Thesis,Dept. Biol. Universität Tübingen, 89 p.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Futuyma, D.J. (1979). Evolutionary biology.—Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 565 p.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gambaryan, P.P. (1974). How animals run. Anatomical adaptions.— Translated from the Russian. Jerusalem and London: 367 p.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Could, S.J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny.— Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Press, 501 p.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gould, S.J. (1980). Is a new general theory of evolution emerging?— Paleobiology 6: 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Could, S.J. (1980). The evolutionary biology of constraint. — Daedalus, Spring 1980: 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gould, S.J., and Lewontin, H. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme.— Proc R Soc London B 205: 581–598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Grant, V. (1977). Organismic evolution.— San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company, 418 p.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gutmann, W.F., and Bonik, K. (1981). Kritische Evolutionstheorie.— Hildesheim: Gerstenberg Verlag, 228 p.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ho, M.W., and Saunders, P.T. (1979). Beyond neo—Darwinism — an epi— genetic approach to evolution.— J theor Biol 78: 573–591.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Klaauw, C.J. van der (1948–1952). Size and position of the functional components of the skull. A contribution to the knowledge of the architecture of the skull, based on data in the literature.— Arch Neerl Zool 9: 1–558.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Klaauw, C.J. van der (1950). Architectuur van de schedel.— Verslagen Kon Akad Wet Amst 59: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Klaauw, C.J. van der (1966). Introduction to the philosophical backgrounds and prospects of the supraspecific comparative anatomy of conservative characters in the adult stages of conservative elements of Vertebrata with an enumeration of many examples.—Verh Kon Ned Akad Wet Aast 2e Reeks 57: 1–196.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kripp, D.v. (1933). Die Kaubewegung und Lebensweise von Edmontosaurus spec. auf Crund der mechanistisch-konstruktiven Analyse.— Paleobiologies 5: 409–422.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kull, U. (1977). Evolution.— Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 304 p.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Leigh, E.C. Jr. (1971). Adaptation and diversity.— San Francisco: Freenan, Cooper and Company, 288 p.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Maynard Smith, J. (1975). The theory of evolution. 3rd edition.— Harmongsworth: Penguin, 344 p.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mayo, 0. (1983). Natural selection and its constraints.— New York: Academic Press, 145 p.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mayr, E. (1963). Animal species and evolution.— Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press, 797 p.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mayr, E. (1982). Adaptation and selection.— Biol Zentralblatt 101: 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Diversity, evolution, and inheritance.— Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press, 974 p.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mayr, Z. (1983). How to carry out the adaptationist program?— Am Nat 121: 324–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Olson, E.C. (I960). Morphology, paleontology, and evolution. In: Evolution after Darwin, vol 1: 523–545. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Peters, D.St., Mollenhauer, D., and Gutmann, W.F. (1971). Bau, Konstruktion und Funktion des Organismus.— Natur und Museum 101: 208–218.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Piaget, J. (1972). Structuralism.— London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Raff, R.A., and Kaufman, T.C. (1983). Embryos, genes, and evolution. — New York, London: Macmillan, 395 p.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Raup, D.M. (1972). Approaches to morphologic analysis.— In T.J.M. Schopf, ed., Models in paleobiology, 28–44. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Raup, D.M., and Michelson, A. (1965). Theoretical morphology of the coiled shell.— Science 187: 1294–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Reif, W.-E. (1975). Lenkende und limitierende Faktoren in der Evolution.— Acta biotheor 24: 136–162.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Reif, W.-E. (1981). Konzepte und Methoden der Funktionsmorphologie. In W.-E.. Reif, ed., Funktionsmorphologie, Paläontologische Kursbücher, Vol 1, 11–24. München: Paläontologische Gesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Reif, W.-E. (1982). Functional morphology on the procrustean bed of the neutralisn-selectionisra debate. Notes on the Constructional Morphology approach.—N Jb Geol Paläont Abh 164: 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Reif, W.-E. (1982). Functional morphology on the procrustean bed of the neutralisn-selectionisra debate. Notes on the Constructional Morphology approach.—N Jb Geol Paläont Abh 164: 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Reif, W.-E. (1982). Functional morphology on the procrustean bed of the neutralisn-selectionisra debate. Notes on the Constructional Morphology approach.—N Jb Geol Paläont Abh 164: 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Reif, W.-E. (1982). Functional morphology on the procrustean bed of the neutralisn-selectionisra debate. Notes on the Constructional Morphology approach.—N Jb Geol Paläont Abh 164: 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Reif, W.-E. (1982). Functional morphology on the procrustean bed of the neutralisn-selectionisra debate. Notes on the Constructional Morphology approach.—N Jb Geol Paläont Abh 164: 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Reif, W.-E., and Robinson, J.A. (1975). Geometrical relationships and the form-function complex: Animal skeletons.–N Jb Geol Paläont Mh 1975: 304–309.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rosen, D.E., and Buth, D.G. (1980). Empirical evolutionary research versus neo-Darwinian speculation.— System Zool 29: 300–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rudwick, M.J.S. (1964). The inference of function from structure in fossils.— Brit J Philos Sci 15: 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Russell, E.S. (1916). Form and function.— London: John Murray, 383 p.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sale, J.B. (1966). Daily food consumption and mode of ingestion in the hyrax.— J E Afr Nat Hist Soc 25: 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Salthe, S.N. (1972). Evolutionary biology. — New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc, 437 p.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Seilacher, A. (1970). Arbeitskonzept zur Konstruktionsmorphologie.— Lethaia 3: 393–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Simpson, G.G. (1963). Historical science.— In C.C. Albritton, ed., The fabric of geology, 24–48. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper & Comp.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Stearns, S.C. (1982). On fitness. — In D. Mossakowski, and G. Roth, eds., Environmental Adaptation and Evolution, 3–18. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Stearns, S.C. (1982). On fitness. — In D. Mossakowski, and G. Roth, eds., Environmental Adaptation and Evolution, 3–18. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Stebbins, G.L. (1971). Processes of organic evolution. 2nd ed.— Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 193 p.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Thenius, B. (1975). Die Schliefer: Stammesgeschichte. in B. Grzimek, ed., Enzyklopädie des Tierreichs, B. 12, 515–524. Zürich, Kindler- Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Thomas, R.D.K. (1979). Constructional morphology.— In R.W. Fairbridge and D. Jablonski, eds., The Encyclopedia of Paleontology, 482–487. Stroudsburg, Penns.: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Thomas, R.D.K., and Reif, W.-E. (1983). Opportunity and constraint in the evolution of organic form.–Geol Soc Amer Abstr Progr I5: 705.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Van Valen, L. (I960). Nonadaptive aspects of evolution.— Amer Natur 94: 305–308.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Waddington, C.H. (1968). The basic ideas of biology.— In C.H. Waddington, ed., Towards a theoretical biology, 1–41. Edinburgh: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Waddington, C.H. (1969). The theory of evolution today. — In H. Koestler and J.R. Smythies, eds.. Beyond Reductionism, 357–395. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Weber, 11. (1955). Stellung und Aufgaben der Morphologie in der Zoologie der Gegenwart.— Zool Anzeiger Suppl Band 18: 137–159.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Weber, H. (1958). Konstruktionsmorphologie.— Zool Jahrb Abt Allg Zool und Physik der Tiere 68: 1–112.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Webster, G., and Goodwin, B.C. (1982). The origin of species: a structuralist approach.— J Social Biol Struct 5: 15–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Weiss, P.A. (1969). The living system: determinism stratified.— In A. Koestler and J.R. Smythies, eds., Beyond reductionism, 3–55. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

G. A. Zweers P. Dullemeijer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reif, WE., Thomas, R.D.K., Fischer, M.S. (1985). Constructional Morphology: The Analysis of Constraints in Evolution Dedicated to A. Seilacher in Honour of His 60. Birthday. In: Zweers, G.A., Dullemeijer, P. (eds) Architecture in Living Structure. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5169-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5169-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8787-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5169-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics