Skip to main content

The Problem of Economic Inequality

  • Chapter
Ideology and Social Science

Abstract

Tracy saw economic inequality as a problem to be understood and tackled, not simply as an eternal fact of life. He recognised that there were different levels of inequality, some more readily overcome than others. What types of inequality were least acceptable to him? As a political liberal, Tracy was particularly troubled by social conditions which prevented men from exercising their natural rights to life, liberty and property. Slavery or bondage was the worst form of inequality; it was incompatible with “civilised” society, in Tracy’s view. The second type of inequality which he attacked was inequality of instruction, skills or knowledge. While it was obvious that everyone had different talents and instructional needs, it was necessary for all men and women to receive a basic instruction to equip them for citizenship and their occupation. Ignorance was the servant of repressive élites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Traité, p. 175. On the Le Chapelier law of 1791, see J. Godechot, Les Institutions de la France sous la Révolution et I’Empire (Paris, 1951), pp. 181 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. Dupont de Nemours, Abrégé des principes de l’économie politique, p. 383; Baudeau, Premiere introduction, pp. 740ff, 803ff.

    Google Scholar 

  3. On the liberal and idéologue belief in philanthropy and sympathy for the deserving poor, cf. Chamfort, Oeuvres complétes (Paris, 1808), vol. II, pp. 116–120; R. Fargher, The ‘Décade Philosophique’, pp. 291 ff; J. Kitchin, Un journal ‘philosophique’. 201–3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cabanis, Quelques principes et quelques vues sur les secours publics, in Oeuvres philosophiques, vol. II, pp. 1–63. For the eighteenth-century background to the discussion of poverty, cf. M. Leroy, Histoire des idées sociales, vol. II, chapter 12; O. Hufton, “Towards an understanding of the poor in eighteenth-century France”, in French Government and Society 1500–1850, ed. Bosher (London, 1973), pp. 145–165.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Head, B.W. (1985). The Problem of Economic Inequality. In: Ideology and Social Science. Archives Internationales D’Histoire Des Idees/International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 112. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5159-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5159-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8783-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5159-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics