Skip to main content

Individuals and Social Relations

  • Chapter
Ideology and Social Science

Abstract

We have seen that, for Tracy, all our ideas come from the perceptions furnished by our senses; simple ideas are those given immediately by the senses, and other ideas are formed by separating and recombining simple ideas in complex ways. Our multitude of ideas have been generated by a small number of mental processes. The faculty of thinking, upon closer inspection, is seen to be composed of four or more specialised faculties, all of which are modes of sensing or perceiving, and they account for all the activity of the mind.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Tracy, “Memoire de Berlin”, published by P. Tisserand in Revue philosophique de la France et de Tetranger, Vol. 116 (1933), at pp. 170–2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. K. Marx, “Theses on Feuerbach”, No. 6 (1845).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Locke, Second Treatise, section 25 ff: cf. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett (New York, 1965), pp. 327 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. J.-J. Rousseau, “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” (1754), in The Social Contract and Discourses, trans. G.D.H. Cole (London, 1973), esp. pp. 64 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For discussion of these writers’ views on sympathy, cf. G. Bryson, Man and Society: The Scottish Inquiry in the Eighteenth Century (Princeton, 1945), esp. chapter 6; G. Morrow, “The significance of the doctrine of sympathy in Hume and A. Smith”, The Philosophical Review, vol. 32 (1923), pp. 60–78; R. Lamb, “A. Smith’s System: Sympathy not self- interest”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 35 (1974), pp. 671–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cf. A. Smith, Theorie des Sentimens Moraux, traduit de l’Anglais par S. Grouchy, Veuve Condorcet (Suivie de huit lettres sur la sympathie) (Paris, 1798 ), vol. II, p. 357.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cf. G. Chinard, Jefferson et les idéologues, p. 209 (letter of Tracy to Jefferson, 22 February 1821 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Destutt de Tracy, De Vamour, trans. amp; ed. G. Chinard (Paris 1926): for the date of composition, see p. 33n.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Head, B.W. (1985). Individuals and Social Relations. In: Ideology and Social Science. Archives Internationales D’Histoire Des Idees/International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 112. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5159-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5159-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8783-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5159-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics