Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences ((DPSS,volume 17))

Summary

This review evaluates management practices that may minimize yield reduction under saline conditions according to three strategies: (I) control of root-zone salinity; (II) reduced damage to the crop; (III) reduced damage to individual plants. Plant response to salinity is described by an unchanged yield up to a threshold soil salinity (a), then a linear reduction in relative yield (b), to a maximum soil salinity that corresponds to zero yield (Y0). Strategies I and II do not take into consideration any change in the parameters of the response curve, while strategy III is aimed at modifying them.

Control of root zone salinity is obtained by irrigation and leaching. From the review of existing data it is concluded that the effective soil salinity parameter should be taken as the mean electrical conductivity of the saturated paste extract or of the soil solution over time and space. Several irrigation and leaching practices are discussed. It is shown that intermittent leaching is more advantageous than leaching at each irrigation. Specific cultivation and irrigation practices that result in soil salinity reduction adjacent to young seedlings and the use of water of low salinity at specifically sensitive growth stages may be highly beneficial. Recent data do not show that reduced irrigation intervals improve crop response more under saline than under nonsaline irrigation. Alternate use of water of different salt concentrations results in mixing in the soil and the crop responds to the mean water salinity.

Reduced damage at the field level when soil or irrigation water salinity is too high to maintain full yield of single plants requires a larger crop stand. For row crops reduced inter-row spacing is more effective than reduced intra-row spacing.

Reduced damage at the plant level while the salinity tolerance of the plants remains constant shows up in the response curve parameters as larger threshold and slope and constant salinity at zero yield. This is the effect of a reduced atmospheric water demand that results in reduced stress in the plant under given salinity. Management can also change the salt tolerance of the crop. This will show up as higher salinity at zero yield, as well as changes in threshold and slope. Such changes in the response curve were found at different growth stages, under different atmospheric CO2, under different fertilization, and when sprinkler irrigation was compared with drip irrigation.

Contribution from the Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel. No. 1111-E 1984 series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayers R S and Westcot D W 1976 Water quality for agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernstein L and Francois L E 1973 Comparison of drip, furrow and sprinkler irrigation. Soil Sci. 115, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein L and Francois L E 1973 Leaching requirement studies: sensitivity of alfalfa to salinity of irrigation and drainage waters. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 37, 931–943.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernstein L and Francois L E 1975 Effect of frequency of sprinkling with saline waters compared with daily drip irrigation. Agron. J. 67, 185–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernstein, Francois L E and Clark R A 1975 Minimal leaching with varying root depths of alfalfa. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 39, 112–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernstein L and Pearson G A 1954 Influence of integrated moisture stress achieved by varying the osmotic pressure of culture solution on growth of tomato and pepper plants. Soil Sci. 77, 355–368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bower C A, Ogata G and Tucker J M 1969 Rootzone salt profiles and alfalfa growth as influenced by irrigation water salinity and leaching fraction. Agron. J. 61, 783–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bresler E and Hoffman G J Irrigation management for salinity control. I. Theories and field tests. (In press)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bresler E, McNeal B L and Carter D L 1982 Saline and Sodic Soils: Principles-Dynamics-Modeling. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Childs S W and Hanks R J 1975 Model for soil salinity effects on crop growth. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 39, 617–622.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. DeWit C T 1958 Transpiration and crop yields. Inst. Biol. Chem. Res. on Field Crops and Herbage. The Netherlands. Verslagen Landbondrez 64, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ehlig L F and Bernstein L 1959 Foliar absorption of NaCl as a factor in sprinkler irrigation. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 74, 661–670.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Enoch H Z, Zieslin N, Biran Y, Halevy A H, Schwartz M, Kessler B and Shimshi D 1973 Principles of carbon dioxide nutrition research. Acta Hort. 32, 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feigin A 1985 Fertilization management of crops irrigated with saline water. Plant and Soil 89, 285–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Feinerman E 1983 Crop density and irrigation with saline water. Western J. Agric. Econ. 8, 134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Francois L E 1981 Alfalfa management under saline conditions with zero leaching. Agron. J. 73, 1042–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Francois L E 1982 Narrow row cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under saline conditions. Irrig. Sci. 3, 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hellal H M and Mengel K 1981 Interaction between light intensity and NaCl salinity and their effects on growth, CO2 assimilation, and photosynthate conversion in young broad beans. Plant Physiol. 67, 999–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffman G J and Jobes J A 1978 Growth and water relation of cereal crops as influenced by salinity and relative humidity. Agron. J. 70, 765–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoffman G J and Jobes J A 1983 Leaching requirement for salinity control. III Barley, cowpea and celery. Agric. Water Mgmt. 6, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoffman G J, Jobes J A and Alves W J 1983 Response of tall fescue to irrigation water salinity, leaching fraction, and irrigation frequency. Agric. Water Mgmt. 7, 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffman G J, Jobes J A, Houscow Z and Maas E V 1978 Timing of environmental stress affects growth, water relation and salt tolerance of pinto beans. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 21, 713–718.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hoffman G J and Rawlins S L 1971 Growth and water potential of root crops as influenced by salinity and relative humidity. Agron. J. 63, 877–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ingvelson R D, Rhoades J D and Page A L 1976 Correlation of alfalfa yield with various indexes of salinity. Soil Sci. 122, 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kafkafi U 1984 Plant nutrition under saline conditions. In Soil Salinity Under Irrigation - Processes and Management. Ecological Studies IV. Eds. I Shainberg and J Shalhevet. Springer Verlag, Berlin. (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Keren R, Meiri A and Kalo Y 1983 Plant spacing effect on yield of cotton irrigated with saline water. Plant and Soil 74, 461–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maas E V, Clark R A and Francois L E 1982 Sprinkling-induced foliar injury to pepper plants: effects of irrigation frequency, duration and water composition. Irrig. Sci. 3, 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Maas E V, Grattan S R and Ogata G 1982 Foliar salt accumulation and injury in crops sprinkled with saline water. Irrig. Sci. 3, 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Maas E V and Hoffman G J 1977 Crop salt tolerance - current assessment. J. Irrig. Drainage Div. ASCE 103 [IR2], 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Maas E V, Hoffman G J, Chaba G D, Poss J A and Shannon M C 1983 Salt sensitivity of corn at various growth stages. Irrig. Sci. 4, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Magisted O C, Ayers A D, Wadleigh C H and Gauch H G 1943. Effect of salt concentration, kind of salt and climate on plant growth in sand cultures. Plant Physiol. 18, 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mantell A, Frenkel H and Meiri A Drip irrigation of cotton with saline-sodic water. Irrig. Sci. (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Meiri A 1984 Plant response to salinity: application of experimental results. In Soil Salinity under Irrigation - Processes and Management, Ecological Studies IV. Eds. I Shainberg and J Shalhevet. Springer Verlag, Berlin. (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Meiri A, Hoffman G J, Shannon M C and Poss J A 1982 Salt tolerance of two musk-melon cultivars under two radiation levels. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 107, 1168–1172.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Meiri A, Kamburov J and Shalhevet J 1977 Transpiration effects on leaching fractions. Agron. J. 69, 779–782.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Meiri A, Plaut Z and Pinkas L 1981 Salt tolerance of glasshouse-grown muskmelon (cv. Galia). Soil Sci. 131, 189–193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Meiri A and Shalhevet J 1973 Pepper plant response to irrigation water quality and timing of leaching. In Physical Aspects of Soil, Water and Salts in Ecosystems. Eds. A Hadas, D Swartzendruber, P E Rijitema, M Fuchs and B Yaron. Ecol. Studies IV, 421–428. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Meiri A, Shalhevet J, Shimshi D and Tibor M 1980 Irrigation of spring potatoes with saline water. Ann. Report, Inst. Soils and Water, Agric. Res. Org., Bet Dagan, Israel. (In Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Meiri A, Shalhevet J, Shimshi D and Tibor M 1982 Irrigation of spring potatoes with saline water. Ann. Report, Inst. Soils and Water, Agric. Res. Org. (In Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Meiri A, Shalhevet J, Stolzy L H, Sinai G and Steinhardt R 1983 Managing multi-source irrigation water of different salinities for optimum crop production. Ann. Report submitted to U.S.-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund, Bet Dagan, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ravikovitch S and Yoles D 1971 The influence of phosphorus and nitrogen on millet and clover growing in soils affected by salinity. I. Plant development. Plant and Soil 35, 555–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schwartz M and Gale J 1984 Growth response to salinity at high levels of carbon dioxide. J. Exp. Bot. 35, 193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shalhevet J, Heuer B and Meiri A 1983 Irrigation interval as a factor in the salt tolerance of eggplant. Irrig. Sci. 4, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shalhevet J, Hoffman G J, Meiri A, Heuer B and Francois L E 1983 Salinity tolerance of crops in irrigated agriculture under dynamic conditions. Final Report submitted to U.S.- Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund, Bet Dagan, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shalhevet J and Yaron B 1983 Effect of soil and water salinity on tomato growth. Plant and Soil 39, 285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shannon M C and Francois L E 1978 Salt tolerance of three muskmelon cultivars. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 103, 127–130.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Stark J C and Jarrell W M 1980 Salinity-induced modifications in the response of maize to water deficits. Agron. J. 72, 745–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. U.S. Salinity Laboratory 1954 Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Handbook U.S. Dept. Agric. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  49. van Schilfgaarde J, Bernstein L, Rhoades J D and Rawlins S L 1974 Irrigation management for salt control. J. Irrig. Drainage Div. ASCE 100 (IR3), 321.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wadleigh C H and Fireman M 1949 Salt distribution under furrow and basin-irrigated cotton and its effect on water removal. Proc. Soil Soc. Am. 13, 527–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wadleigh C H, Gouch H G and Magistad OC 1946 Growth and rubber accumulation in guayule as conditioned by salinity and irrigation regime. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 925, p 34.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yaron B, Shalhevet J and Shimshi D 1973 Patterns of salt distribution under trickle irrigation. In Physical Aspects of Soil, Water and Salts in Ecosystems, Eds. A Hadas, D Swartzendruber, P E Rijtema, M Fuchs and B Yaron Ecol. Studies IV, 389 - 394. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meiri, A., Plaut, Z. (1985). Crop production and management under saline conditions. In: Pasternak, D., San Pietro, A. (eds) Biosalinity in Action: Bioproduction with Saline Water. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5111-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5111-2_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8759-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5111-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics