Abstract
According to Gadamer1 the period between the two World Wars was one of extraordinary spiritual fertility. The economic, social, and political disaster which, particularly in Germany, followed World War I completely destroyed the optimism and idealism prevailing in the liberal era that preceded the first World War. There were very few people in Germany who still believed that the future holds nothing but progress. During the same period the neo-Kantian philosophy which had become dominant in Germany during the last quarter of the 19th Century, suddenly began to appear to many as being no longer acceptable. Several authors spoke about a complete breakdown of German Idealism and some even felt that a general decline of Western civilization was imminent (Paul Ernst, Oswald Spengler). This criticism of neo-Kantianism was prepared by Nietzsche’s attack on Platonism and historical Christianity as well as by Kierkegaard’s criticism of absolute Idealism. The first traces of this critique, however, were not found in philosophy, but rather in the so-called dialectical theology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
H.-G. Gadamer, “Zur Einführung”, in Martin Heidegger, Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1970), pp. 102–125, p. 102.
Ibid., pp. 102–103.
Ibid., pp. 103–105.
SZ, §§ 1–4, 7.
SZ, §§ 4 and 9.
SZ, p. 1 (19).
SZ, p. 7 (27).
SZ, pp. 27–39 (49–63).
SZ, § 69.
SZ, §§ 29, 65, 68.
SZ, §§ 38, 65, 68.
SZ, §§ 46–53.
SZ, §§ 54–60.
SZ, §§ 31–32.
SZ, § 29.
SZ, §§ 34, 68.
SZ, § 64.
SZ, § 59.
SZ, §§ 61–63.
SZ, §§ 64, 65, 68.
Cf. William J. Richardson, “Heidegger’s Way Through Phenomenology to the Thinking of Being”, in Heidegger. The Man and the Thinker, ed. by Thomas Sheehan (Chicago: Precedent Publishing, Inc., 1981), pp. 79–93.
William J. Richardson, On the Truth of Being. Reflections on Heidegger s Later Philosophy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984), ch. I–III.
HW, 344 (PLT, xxiii–xxiv).
H.-G. Gadamer, “Zur Einführung”, in Martin Heidegger, Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1970), pp. 107–108.
Ibid., p. 108.
SZ, §§, 14 and 24.
WG, 23–37 (47–85).
WG, 37 (85).
WG, 37–39 (84–89).
WG 39 (89).
WG 43–51 (101–121); cf. 38–42 (87–99).
H.-G. Gadamer, “Zur Einführung”, in Martin Heidegger, Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1970), pp. 107–110.
HW, 66–68 (79–81).
HW, 344 (xxiii–xxiv).
Martin Heidegger, Erläuterungen zu Hölderlins Dichtung (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1963), pp. 31–46 (270–291).
Cf. particularly US, 11–33 (PLT, 189–210), 159–216 (57–108), 37–82 (159–198), and 219–238 (139–156).
Cf. Poetry, Language, and Thought, pp. xxiii-xxiv.
HW, 344. In the 1970 Reclam edition Heidegger adds that the Addendum was written in 1956 (Cf. PLT, p. xxiv).
HW, 66–67 (79–80).
HW, 66 (79). Cf. C.O. Schräg, “The Transvaluationof Aesthetics and the Work of Art”, in The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 4(1973), pp. 109–124.
Hegel, Werke, X, 1, pp. 134–135, 16.
HW, 66–67 (79–80).
HW, 67–68 (80–81).
HW, 67–68 (81).
Martin Heidegger, Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes (Reclam edition), p. 73 (PLT, 86); Otto Pöggeler, Der Denkweg Martin Heideggers (Pfullingen: Neske, 1963), p. 207.
Otto Pöggeler, Philosophie und Politik bei Heidegger (Freiburg: Alber, 1972), pp. 122–123. The book by Schwan referred to is: Politische Philosophie im Denken Martin Heideggers (Cologne: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1965).
Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, Heideggers Philosophie der Kunst. Eine systematische Interpretation der Holzwege-Abhandlung “Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes” (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1980), pp. xvii–xxiii).
Walter Biemel, Martin Heidegger. An Illustrated Study (New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1976), pp. 92–148.
von Herrmann, Heideggers Philosophie der Kunst. Eine systematische Interpretation der Holzwege-Abhandlung “Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes” (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1980), pp. xviii).
Ibid., p. xxiii.
Ibid.
Ibid., pp. xxi–xxii.
Ibid., p. xxii.
Jacques Taminiaux, “Le dépassement heideggérien de l’esthétique et l’héritage de Hegel”, in Recoupements (Bruxelles: Ousia, 1982), 175–208;
Jacques Taminiaux, “Entre l’attitude esthétique et la mort de l’art”, in Recoupements (Bruxelles: Ousia, 1982), 150–174.
HW, 66 (79); Der Ursprung, 73 (86); Taminiaux, “Le dépassement”, p. 175.
Taminiaux, loc. cit., pp. 175–177; Heidegger, HW, 66–68 (79–81).
HW, 66 (79).
Hegel, Werke, Vol. X, I, 16. Hegel’s Introduction to Aesthetics, p. 11.
Taminiaux, loc. cit., pp. 176–177; Heidegger, HW, 66–67 (79–80).
Taminiaux, loc. cit., p. 177; Heidegger, HW, 66 (79).
HW, 67 (80).
Taminiaux, loc. cit., pp. 177–178; Heidegger, HW, 67 (80).
Taminiaux, loc. cit., p. 178; Heidegger, HW, 68 (81).
Taminiaux, loc. cit., pp. 178–179.
Hegel, Werke, Vol. XVIII, 321.
Martin Heidegger, “Hegel und die Griechen”, in W, 421–438.
Taminiaux, loc. cit., pp. 180–181.
Ibid., p. 181.
Ibid., pp. 181–182.
G.W.F. Hegel, The Phenomenology of Mind, transl. by J.В. Baillie (New York: Humanities Press, Inc., 1977), pp. 753–754; Heidegger, HW, 30 (41);
cf. Taminiaux, loc. cit., pp. 199–201.
TuK, 12 (294), 34–36 (315–317); Taminiaux, loc. cit., pp. 206–207. Cf. “Nur noch ein Gott kann uns Retten”, Spiegel-Gespräch mit Martin Heidegger am 23. September 1966, in Der Spiegel, No. 23, 1976, pp. 193–219, p. 219; “Only A God Can Save Us: Der Spiegel’s Interview with Martin Heidegger”, transl. by M.P. Alter and J.D. Caputo, in Philosophy Today, 20 (1976), pp. 267–284, p. 283–284; “Die Herkunft der Kunst und die Bestimmung des Denkens”, in Distanz und Nähe, pp. 11–22.
N, I, 126–135 (107–114).
Taminiaux, loc. cit., pp. 207–208; cf. “Entre l’attitude esthétique et la mort de l’art”, in Recoupement, pp. 150–174.
HW, 7–8 (17–18); FvH, 1–5; WBH, 93.
HW, 64 (77–78).
HW, 7–8 (17–18).
FvH, pp. 36–37, 41, 67, 93.
GP, § 5.
SZ, 15 (36). For § 16, b-d see also Heidegger and Science, § 6 (forthcoming).
SZ, 16 (37).
SZ, 17–19 (38–40).
SZ, 19–20 (41–42); 372–411 (424–464).
SZ, 20–23 (42–45).
KPM, 185 (211); WRH, 90–93.
GP, § 5.
SZ, 153 (194–195).
GP, § 5.
SZ, 15–16(36–38).
SZ, 27 (49–50).
SZ, 28–29 (51–52).
SZ, 29–31 (53–55).
SZ, 31 (54–55).
SZ, 28 (50), 32n (489, n. iv); SD, 87; WRH, x-xii.
Edmund Husserl, Cartesian Meditations, transl. by Dorion Cairns (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1960), p. 12.
SZ, 212–230 (256–273).
SZ, 32 (55–56).
SZ, 32–33 (56–57).
SZ, 33–34 (57–58).
Hans Albert, Traktat über kritische Vernunft (Tübingen: Mohr, 1968), p. 145;
Carl Friedrich Gethmann, Verstehen und Auslegung. Das Methodenproblem in der Philosophie Martin Heideggers (Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann, 1974), p. 93.
SZ, 59–62 (86–90).
SZ, 200–212 (244–256).
SZ, 212–230 (256–273).
Aristotle, Peri Hermeneias, cc. 1–6; Metaphysica, Z; Ethic. Nicom., Z.
C.F. Gethmann, op. cit., pp. 113–114; cf. pp. 107–114.
SZ, 34–35 (58–59).
SZ, 35 (59); 230 (272–273).
SZ, 28 (50).
SZ, 34 (57–58).
KPM, 46–47 (47–49); Gethmann, op. cit., pp. 93–107.
SZ. 37 (61–62).
Ibid.
SZ, 37–38 (62–63).
HW, 8 (18). Cf. FvH, 5–7.
Hegel’s Introduction to Aesthetics, pp. 24–25.
H.-G. Gadamer, Truth and Method, p. 235.
SZ, 134–138 (172–179).
SZ, 142–147 (182–188).
SZ, 148–149 (188–189).
SZ, 148–150 (189–190).
SZ, 150 (190–191); cf. SZ, 232 (275).
SZ, 150–151 (191–193).
SZ, 232 (275).
Cf. H.-G. Gadamer, “Vom Zirkel des Verstehens”, in Martin Heidegger zum siebzigsten Geburtstag (Pfullingen: Neske, 1959), pp. 24–34;
Erasmus Schöfer, “Heidegger’s Language: Meta-logical Forms of Thought and Grammatical Specialties”, in Joseph J. Kockelmans, On Heidegger and Language (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1972), pp. 281–301, pp. 281–287.
SZ, 7–8 (27).
SZ, 8 (27–28).
SZ, 150–151 (190–192).
SZ, 151 (192–193); 232 (275).
SZ, 314–316 (362–364).
Hegel’s Introduction to Aesthetics, p. 24.
Taminiaux, Loc. cit., pp. 185–186.
Hegel, Phenomenology of Mind, p. 422.
Taminiaux, loc. cit., pp. 187–188.
Ibid., pp. 191–192.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kockelmans, J.J. (1985). Introductory Reflections the Historical Context of the Lectures their Subject Matter and Method. In: Heidegger on Art and Art Works. Phaenomenologica, vol 99. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5067-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5067-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-3144-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5067-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive