Abstract
The next development in the history of knowledge about the arts which Heidegger discusses in his “Six Basic Developments in the History of Aesthetics” coincides with the formation of modern aesthetics. This development again did not originate immediately from art and from reflections on art. Rather it involves our entire modern history and coincides with the beginning of the modern age.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
N, I, 98–100. Cf. Wilhelm Dilthey, “Die drei Epochen der modernen Ästhetik und ihre heutige Aufgabe” (1892), in Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. VI (Leipzig: Teubner, 1924), pp. 242–287; Rudolf A. Makkreel, Dilthey: Philosopher of the Human Studies (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975), pp. 81–88.
N, I, 98–99(83).
N, I, 99–100 (83–84). Cf. Part II, §§ 15, 22, and passim.
Wilhelm Dilthey, “Die drei Epochen”, pp. 242ff.
Ibid., p. 253.
In 1618 Descartes completed a theoretical treatise on music in which one can find a brief description of the basic principles of such a rationalist aesthetics. Cf. R. Descartes, Compendium Musicae, in Oeuvres, ed. by Charles Adam and Paul Tannery, Vol. X (Paris: Cerf, 1908), pp. 89–141; cf. Wilhelm Dilthey, loc. cit., p. 249.
A.G. Baumgarten, Meditationes Philosophicae de Nonnulis ad Poema Pertinentibus (1735), in Reflections on Poetry, transl. with original text and ed. by K. Aschenbrenner and W.B. Holther (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1954); Aesthetica (1750–1758), 2 vols. (Hildesheim: Olms, 1961).
A.G. Baumgarten, Meditationes, § 115.
A.G. Baumgarten, Aesthetica, Vol. I, Praef., pp. 2–3.
G.F. Meier, Anfangsgründe aller schönen Wissenschaften, 2 vols. (Halle: C. Hemmerde, 1754–1755).
A. Baeumler, Kants Kritik der Urtheilskraft (Halle: Niemeyer, 1923), p. 1.
A.G. Baumgarten, Aesthetik, Vol. I, §4; Meditationes, Praef., p. 4. Cf. J. Ritter, “Ästhetik”, in Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie (Stuttgart: Schwabe, 1971ff.), Vol. I, col. 555–580, col. 556.
A.G. Baumgarten, Aesthetica, Vol. I, §§ 26–46.
G.F. Meier, op. cit., Vol. I, § 6; cf. J. Ritter, art. cit., col. 556.
A.G. Baumgarten, Meditationes, §§ 1, 4, 13, 116, 117; G.F. Meier, op. cit., Vol. I, § 2.
G.F. Meier, op. cit., Vol. I § 6; cf. J. Ritter, art. cit., col. 557.
J. Ritter, art. cit., col. 557–558.
A.G. Baumgarten, Meditationes, §§ 94, 95, 167, 533; Aesthetica., Vol. I, §§ 14, 18–20.
J. Ritter, art. cit., col. 558–559.
Ibid., col. 559–560.
Wilhelm Dilthey, loc. cit., p. 253.
Ibid., pp. 254–262. Cf. Edmund Burke, On Taste, On the Sublime, and the Beautiful, etc. (New York: Collier, 1909); Gerard Alexander, An Essay on Taste (New York: Garland, 1970); An Essay on Genius (New York: Garland, 1971–1972); Hugh Blair, Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, ed. by H.F. Harding (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1965); Thomas Reid, Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1969), pp. 532–568, 733–808.
GKHE, pp. 253–255.
Wilhelm Dilthey, loc. cit., pp. 263–266.
Ibid., pp. 266–270. Cf. Rudolf Makkreel, Dilthey, pp. 81–88.
GKHE, pp. 314–316.
G.F. Herder, Sämtliche Werke., ed. by В. Suphan (Berlin: Weidemann, 1877–1913), Vol. IV, p. 41.
Ibid., Vol. XIII, p. 9; cf. Vol. I, pp. 43–45, 395; Vol. V, pp. 1–3.
GKHE, pp. 314–318.
G.F.W. Hegel, Sämtliche Werke., ed. by Hoffmeister (Hamburg: Meiner, 1952ff.), Vol. XIX, p. 601.
GKHE, pp. 321–322
Immanuel Kant, Werke, ed. by Cassirer, 11 vols. (Berlin: B. Cassirer, 1921–1923), Vol. V, p. 213.
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment, transl. by J.H. Bernard (London: Macmillan, 1914), pp. 13–14.
Ibid., p. 42.
Ibid., pp. 45–100, passim.
N, I, 126–128 (107–108).
Kant, Critique of Judgment, sect. 2–5.
Ibid.
F.W. Nietzsche, Gesammelte Werke., ed. by R. Oehler and F. Würzbach (Mussarion-Ausgabe) (Munich: Mussarion, 1920–1929), Vol. XIV, p. 132.
N, I, 129–130 (110); cf. 128–130 (108–110).
N, I, 130 (110). Heidegger refers here to Plato’s ekphanestaton.
H.G. Gadamer, Truth and Method (New York: Seabury, 1975), pp. 39–41.
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment, p. 218; cf. pp. 197–205. Cf. H.-G. Gadamer, op. cit., pp. 44–49. Kant expresses here an opinion which has a very long tradition and which one finds regularly formulated in treatises written in the 19th and 20th centuries. Perhaps no one has expressed this conviction as succinctly and clearly as Tolstoi in What is Art?, transl. by A. Maude (London: Oxford University Press, 1955).
Immanuel Kant, op. cit., pp. 188–190; cf. pp. 190–193, 197–205.
Ibid., pp. 193–196; H.-G. Gadamer, op. cit., pp. 49–51.
J.W. Goethe, Werke, Grossherzogin Sophie Ausgabe (Weimar: H. Böhlau, 1887–1912), Vol. XLII, p. 142.
GKHE, pp. 346–347.
J.W. Goethe, Werke, Jubiläum Ausgabe (Stuttgart: Cotta, 1902–1907), Vol. XXXII, p. 141; Propyläenausg. (Munich: Müller, 1914ff.), Vol. VI, p. 451
Cf. Part II, § 32 below.
GKHE, p. 349.
Ibid., p. 351; cf. pp. 350–351.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kockelmans, J.J. (1985). Modern Aesthetics. In: Heidegger on Art and Art Works. Phaenomenologica, vol 99. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5067-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5067-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-3144-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5067-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive