Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Forestry Sciences ((FOSC,volume 16))

Abstract

As the multinet growth hypothesis still attracts much attention and support, it seems desirable to reconsider the observations and deductions on microfibril arrangements in tip growth of cells, which led to Roelofsen and Houwink’s (1953) formulation of MGH, to explain variations in microfibril orientation at different positions in the thickness of the cell wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boyd, J.D. (1985). Reassessment of data on tip growth and conclusions on MGH. In: Biophysical control of microfibril orientation in plant cell walls. Forestry Sciences, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5065-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5065-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8742-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5065-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics