Abstract
It is generally agreed upon that about the year 1925,1 more definitely about 1929, there came about a remarkable and profound change in Husserl’s thought — a change which may be indicated, though not adequately characterised, by the fact that he began to make more and more use of the term life-world. Two such changes, each one of which may be maintained as having been equally radical, had characterised the development of his thought in its earlier stages: one was the turn from the alleged psychologism of Philosophie der Arithmetik (1891) to the essentialism of Prolegomena to Pure Logic (1900), and the other, slowly making its appearance in the second volume of Logical Investigations (1901) established itself definitively in Ideas I (1913) as a turn from essentialism to transcendental idealism centering on the key concept of a constituting transcendental subjectivity. The concept of the life-world now, about the late twenties, seems to lay claim to replace or at least profoundly modify the concept of transcendental subjectivity as the key to Husserl’s later thought. We thus may regard the three concepts: essence, transcendental subjectivity (TS) and life-world (LW) as being the key concepts of the three major phases of Husserl’s thought. I do not believe that any of the three terms mentioned above signified a total departure from its preceding phase.
Read at the meetings of the International Society for Phenomenology held in New York in 1971. Subsequently appeared in: A.T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Analecta Husserliana, Vol. III (1974), pp. 46–65. Reprinted by permission from D. Reidel Publishers, Dordrecht.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Cf., e.g., I. Kern, Husserl und Kant (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1964), p. 255.
E. Husserl, Formale und transzendentale Logik, p. 98.
Ibid., p. 229.
E. Husserl, Logical Investigations I, p. 99.
E. Husserl, Erste Philosophie, ed. by Rudolf Boehm, Vol. II, Hua VII (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1959), pp. 203–204.
E. Husserl, Logical Investigations I, p. 143.
E. Husserl, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, Engl. Trans. by David Carr (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970), p. 139. All references in the body of the paper to Husserl’s Crisis are to this English edition.
Formale und transzendentale Logik p. 219, fn. 1.
Logical Investigations II, p. 456; Formale und transzendentale Logik, Section 55.
Also cf. Erste Philosophie I, p. 224 ff. fn.
E. Husserl, Cartesianische Meditationen, ed. by S. Strasser, Hua I (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1959), Section 64.
Formale und transzendentale Logik, Section 98.
Formale und transzendentale Logik, pp. 219–220.
Cf. D.M. Levin, Reason and Evidence in Husserl’s Phenomenology, p. 161; S. Bachelard, A Study of Husserl’s Formal and Transcendental Logic, English trans. by Lester E. Embree (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968), pp. 181–184.
E. Husserl, Die Idee der Phänomenologie, ed. by Walter Biemel, Hua II (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950), pp. 51–52.
Ideen III, Hua V, p. 28.
E. Husserl, Phänomenologische Psychologie, ed. by Walter Biemel, Hua IX (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962), p. 71.
Cartesianische Meditationen, pp. 28–30, 38, 181–182.
Section 36.
Crisis, p. 140.
Ibid., p. 141.
Ibid., p. 139.
Ibid., p. 139.
Ibid., p. 139.
Logical Investigations I, p. 143.
Cf. E. Husserl, Ideen II, ed. by Marly Biemel, Hua IV (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1952).
Ibid., pp. 376–377.
Ibid., p. 377.
Ibid., p. 375.
Ibid., p. 376.
Erste Philosophie I, p. 153.
Cartesianische Meditationen, p. 135.
P. Ricœur, Husserl: An Analysis of his Phenomenology, pp. 139, 173.
Section 98.
Phänomenologische Psychologie, pp. 33–35.
Erfahrung und Urteil, p. 24
Section 9.
Section 6.
Section 10.
Ibid., p. 39.
Ibid., p. 33.
Section 21a.
Ibid., p. 41.
D. Carr, “Husserl’s Problematic Concept of the Life-World,” American Philosophical Quarterly (1970), pp. 331–339.
W. Marx, Vernunft und Welt: Zwischen Tradition und anderem Anfang (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970), esp. pp. 63–77.
Cf. A. Gurwitsch, “Problem of Life-World,” in: M. Natanson (Ed.), Phenomenology and Social Reality: Essays in Memory of A. Schutz (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970), pp. 35–61.
Husserl, Crisis, p. 142.
Ibid., pp. 345, 348.
Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, p. 30.
Ibid., p. 221.
Gurwitsch, “Problem of Life-World,” pp. 35–61.
Cf. L. Landgrebe, “Husserl’s Departure from Cartesianism,” in: R.O. Elveton (Ed.), The Phenomenology of Husserl (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1970). According to Landgrebe, “Transcendental Subjectivity is nothing else than the inseparable unity of world experience and its intentional correlate, the intended world experienced within it….” (p. 286).
Husserl, Crisis, p. 174.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mohanty, J.N. (1985). “Life-World” and “A Priori” in Husserl’s Later Thought. In: The Possibility of Transcendental Philosophy. Phaenomenologica, vol 98. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5049-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5049-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-3146-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5049-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive