Abstract
When all three partners of the newly formed evaluation firm of DATAFAX, INC., were interviewed for a potential contract by the project directors, the company philosophy soon became clear: data and facts were the same thing — and the only thing. The junior partner, Joe Friday, when asked how they would proceed if awarded the contract replied, “All we want are the facts, ma’am.”1 When the project director inquired about a theoretical base for the evaluation, the second partner, Sherlock Holmes, immediately cautioned, “It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories instead of theories to suit facts” (Doyle, 1981, p. 163). Lest Holmes, the most erudite of the partners, be misunderstood, the senior partner and founder of the firm, Thomas Gradgrind, of Dickens fame, reminded the clients, “In this life, we want nothing but Facts, sir; nothing but Facts!” (1981, p. 25).
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cronbach, L.J. (1982). Designing evaluations of education and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Deutscher, I. (1976). “Words and deeds: Social science and social policy.” In W.B. Sanders (ed.), The sociologist as detective. An introduction to research methods. New York: Praeger.
Dickens, C. (1981). Hard Times. New York: Bantam Books. (Original work published in 1854.)
Doyle, A.C. (1981). “A scandal in Bohemia.” In J. Symons (ed.), The complete adventures of Sherlock Holmes. London: Secker and Warburg.
Fink, A. and Kosecoff, J. (1983). “How to evaluate cost effectiveness.” How to evaluate education programs, 65, 1–7.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1981). Standards for evaluation of educational programs, projects, and materials. New York: McGraw-Hill.
LaPierre, R.T. (1928). “Race prejudice: France and England.” Social Forces, 7, 102–111.
Levin, H.M. (1974). “Cost effectiveness analysis in evaluation research.” Evaluation Consortium, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lloyd, A.L. (1967). Folk song in England. Great Britain: Lawrence and Wishart.
Lloyd, J.S. and Abrahamson, S. (1979). “Effectiveness of continuing medical education: A review of the evidence.” Evaluation and the Health Professions, 2 (3), 251–280.
Madaus, G.F. and McDonagh, J.T. (1982). “As I roved out: Folksong collecting as a metaphor for evaluation.” In N.L. Smith (ed.), Communication strategies in evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Medawar, P. (1982). Pluto’s Republic. New York: Oxford University Press.
Morris, L.L. and Fitz-Gibbon, C.T. (1978). How to measure program implementation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Perry, W.G., Jr. (1967). “Examsmanship and the liberal arts: A study in educational epistemology.” In M.C. Beardsley (ed.), Modes of argument. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing.
Scriven, M. (1973). “The methodology of education.” In B.R. Worthen and J.R. Sanders (eds.), Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. Belmont, California: Charles A. Jones.
Scriven, M. (1974). “Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation.” In W. J. Popham (ed.), Evaluation in education. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing.
Snow, C.P. (1962). The two cultures: And a second look. Glasgow: Blackie and Son, Ltd.
Sibley, J.C., Sackett, D.L., Neufeld, V., Gerrard, B., Rudnick, K.V., and Fraser, W. (1982). “A randomized trial of continuing medical education.” New England Journal of Medicine, 306 (9), 511–515.
Spector, R.D. (1981). Introduction to Hard times. New York: Bantam Books.
Stufflebeam, D. (1973). “An introduction to the PDK book: Educational evaluation and decision making.” In B.R. Worthen and J.R. Sanders (eds.), Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. Belmont, California: Charles A. Jones.
Stufflebeam, D. (1983). “The CIPP model for program evaluation.” In G.F. Madaus, M. Scriven, and D. Stufflebeam (eds.), Evaluation models. Hingham, Massachusetts: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Thomas, L. (1979). The Medusa and the snail: More notes of a biology watcher. New York: Bantam Books.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Madaus, G.F. (1985). Data-Collection Problems in Evaluation. In: Abrahamson, S. (eds) Evaluation of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4986-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4986-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8707-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4986-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive