Skip to main content

Anxiety, stress and performance

  • Chapter
Individual Differences in Movement

Abstract

Research on human anxiety and performance has been conducted within the framework of a narrowly defined paradigm: high and low anxious persons are selected on the basis of their scores on self-reports and then subjected to various experimental treatments designed to elicit situational anxiety. Dependent measures cover indices of autonomic and central-nervous activity, subjective feelings of anxiety, and a variety of performance parameters. This strategy combining quasi-experimental and experimental research turned out to be useful in elaborating and testing hypotheses concerning the relationships between the variables under study and has led to a vast body of relevant findings. In early research on anxiety and performance1, anxiety was conceptualized as an energizing drive as specified in Hullian learning theory2. Observable behaviour was conceived of as an immediate consequence of the interaction between two theoretical constructs, habit (designating the degree of previous learning of specific S-R connections) and drive (as an index of the sum of momentary needs). Habit and drive jointly determine the strength of excitatory potential which manifests itself in observable behaviour in instances of a hypothetical response threshold being exceeded. It was postulated that habit and drive should be related multiplicatively, implying that the value of both variables had to be greater than zero in order to render observable responses possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Taylor, J. A. (1951). The relationship of anxiety to the conditioned eyelid response. J. Exp. Psychol., 41, 81–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of Behavior. ( New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts )

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor, J. A. (1953). A personality scale of manifest anxiety. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 48, 285–90

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Spence, K. W., Farber, I. E. and McFann, H. H. (1956). The relation of anxiety (drive) level to performance in competitional and non-competitional paired-associates learning. J. Exp. Psychol., 52, 296–305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spielberger, C. D. and Smith, L. H. (1966). Anxiety (drive), stress, and serial-position effects in serial-verbal learning. J. Exp. Psychol., 72, 589–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Spence, K. W. (1958). A theory of emotionally based drive (D) and its relation to performance in simple learning situations. Am. Psychol., 13, 131–41

    Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor, J. A. (1956). Drive theory and manifest anxiety. Psychol. Bull., 53, 303–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nicholson, W. M. (1958). The influence of anxiety upon learning: interference or drive increment? J. Pers., 26, 303–19

    Google Scholar 

  9. Spence, J. T. and Spence, K. W. (1966). The motivational components of manifest anxiety: drive and drive stimuli. In Spielberger, C. D. (ed.) Anxiety and Behaviour. pp. 291–326. ( New York: Academic Press )

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mandler, G. and Sarason, S. B. (1952). A study of anxiety and learning. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 47, 166–73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mednick, S. A. (1957). Generalization as a function of manifest anxiety and adaptation to psychological experiments. J. Consult. Psychol., 21, 491–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bindra, D., Paterson, A. L. and Strzelecki, J. (1955). On the relation between anxiety and conditioning. Can. J. Psychol., 9, 1–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cattell, R. B. and Scheier, I. H. (1961). The Meaning and Measurement of Neuroticism and Anxiety. ( New York: Ronald )

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eysenck, H. J. (1983). Cicero and the state-trait theory of anxiety: another case of delayed recognition. Am. Psychol., 38, 114–15

    Google Scholar 

  15. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L. and Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. ( Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press )

    Google Scholar 

  16. Spielberger, C. D. (1972). Anxiety as an emotional state. In Spielberger, C. D. (ed.) Anxiety: Current Trends in Theory and Research. Vol. 1, pp. 23–49. ( New York: Academic Press )

    Google Scholar 

  17. Glanzmann, P. and Laux, L (1978). The effects of trait anxiety and two kinds of stressors on state anxiety and performance. In Spielberger, C. D. and Sarason, I. G. (eds.) Stress and Anxiety. Vol. 5, pp. 145–64. ( Washington, DC: Hemisphere )

    Google Scholar 

  18. Glover, C. B. and Cravens, R. R. (1974). Trait anxiety, stress, and learning: a test of Saltz’s hypothesis. J. Res. Pers., 8, 243–53

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hodges, W. F. (1968). Effects of ego threat and threat of pain on state anxiety. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 8, 364–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lamb, D. H. (1973). The effects of two stressors on state anxiety for students who differ in trait anxiety. J. Res. Pers., 7, 116–26

    Google Scholar 

  21. Margalit, C., Teichman, Y. and Levitt, R. (1980). Emotional reaction to physical threat: re- exaination with female subjects. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 48, 403–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Terasaki, M. (1981). Manifest anxiety, noise, and serial reaction performance. Jap. J. Psychol., 52, 53–6

    Google Scholar 

  23. Watson, D. and Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychol. Bull., 96, 465–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lazarus-Mainka, G. (1984). Ängstlichkeit — auch ein Sprachstil. Presented at the 26th Meeting of Experimental Psychologists, April 15–19, Nürnberg

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kirkcaldy, B. D. (1984). The interrelationship between state and trait variables. J. Pers. Individ. Differences, 5, 141–9

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kendall, P. C., Finch, A. J., Auerbach, S. M., Hooke, J. F. and Mikulka, P. J. (1976). The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: a systematic evaluation. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 44, 406–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schönpflug, W. and Wieland, R. (1982). Untersuchungen zur Äquivalenz schwankender Schallpegel: Schwankende Schallpegel, Leistungshandeln und der Wechsel von Arbeit und Erholung. Forschungsbericht Nr. 82 — 10501204. ( Berlin: Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministers des Innern )

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fröhlich, W. D. and Glanzmann, P. (1983). Kortikale Aufmerksamkeitsregulation, Angstneigung und subjektive Erwartung. In Lüer, G. (ed.) Bericht überden 33. Kongrefi der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Mainz 1982. Vol. 1, pp. 232–6. ( Göttingen: Hogrefe )

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lazarus-Mainka, G., Friebel, U. and Unshelm, S. (1982). Angstlichkeit und das Vorstellen bedrohlicher Situationen. Psychol. Beiträge, 24, 356–69

    Google Scholar 

  30. Glanzmann, P. (1985). Zusammenhänge zwischen Angstneigung und Zustandsangst in unterschiedlichen Stress-Situationen. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie. (In press)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Morris, L. W. and Liebert, R. M. (1973). Effects of negative feedback, threat of shock, and level of trait anxiety on the arousal of two components of anxiety. J. Counsel. Psychol., 20, 321–6

    Google Scholar 

  32. O’Neil, H. F., Spielberger, C. D. and Hansen, D. N. (1969). Effects of state anxiety and task difficulty on computer-assisted learning. J. Educ. Psychol., 60, 343–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schwenkmezger, P. (1985). Modelle der Eigenschafts- und Zustandsangst: Theoretische Analysen undempirische Untersuchungen zur Angsttheorie Spielbergers. ( Weinheim: Beltz )

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sarason, I. G. (1960). Empirical findings and theoretical problems in the use of anxiety scales. Psychol. Bull., 57, 403–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Snyder, C. R. and Smith, T. W. (1982). Symptoms of self-handicapping strategies: the virtues of old wine in a new bottle. In Weary, G. and Mirels, H. L. (eds.) Integrations of Clinical and Social Psychology. ( New York: Oxford University Pres )

    Google Scholar 

  36. Laux, L. (1985). A self-presentational view of coping with stress. In Appley, M. H. and Trumbull, R. (eds.) Advances in Stress Theory. (In press)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liebert, R. M. and Morris, L. W. (1967). Cognitive and emotional components of test anxiety: a distinction and some initial data. Psychol. Rep., 20, 975–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Heckhausen, H. (1982). Task-irrelevant cognitions during an exam: incidence and effects. In Krohne, H. W. and Laux, L. (eds.) Achievement, Stress, and Anxiety. pp. 247–74. ( Washington, DC: Hemisphere )

    Google Scholar 

  39. Spielberger, C. D., Anton, W. D. and Bedell, J. (1976). The nature and treatment of test anxiety. In Zuckerman, M. and Spielberger, C. D. (eds.) Emotions and Anxiety: New Concepts, Methods, and Applications. pp. 317–45. ( Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum )

    Google Scholar 

  40. Spielberger, C. D., Gonzales, H. P., Taylor, C. J., Algaze, B. and Anton, W. D. (1978). Examination stress and test anxiety. In Spielberger, C. D. and Sarason, I. G. (eds.) Stress and Anxiety. Vol. 5, pp. 167–91. ( Washington, DC: Hemisphere )

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wine, J. (1971). Test anxiety and the direction of attention. Psychol. Bull., 76, 92–104

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wine, J. D. (1982). Evaluation anxiety: a cognitive attentional construct. In Krohne, H. W. and Laux, L. (eds.) Achievement, Stress, and Anxiety. pp. 207–19. ( Washington, DC: Hemisphere )

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: reactions to tests. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 46, 929–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hodapp, V. (1982). Causal inference from nonexperimental research on anxiety and educational achievement. In Krohne, H. W. and Laux, L. (eds.) Achievement, Stress, and Anxiety, pp. 355–72. ( Washington, DC: Hemisphere )

    Google Scholar 

  45. Spielberger, C. D. (1980). Test Anxiety Inventory (‘Test Attitude Inventory’). ( Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press )

    Google Scholar 

  46. Morris, L. W. and Liebert, R. M. (1970). Relationship of cognitive and emotional com¬ponents of test anxiety to physiological arousal and academic performance. J. Consulting Clin. Psychol., 35, 332–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Laux, L., Glanzmann, P., Schaffner, P. and Spielberger, C. D. (1981). Das State-Trait-Angstinventar (STAI). Theoretische Grundlagen und Handanweisung. ( Weinheim: Beltz )

    Google Scholar 

  48. Endler, N. S., Hunt, J. M. and Rosenstein, A. J. (1962). An S-R inventory of anxiousness. Psychol. Monogr., 536, 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  49. Endler, N. S. (1980). Person-situation interaction and anxiety. In Kutash, I. L. and Schlesinger, L. B. (eds.) Handbook on Stress and Anxiety. pp. 249–66. ( San Francisco: Jossey-Bass )

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mellstrom, M., Cicala, G. A. and Zuckerman, M. (1976). General versus specific trait anxiety measures in the prediction of fear of snakes, heights, and darkness. J. Consulting Clin. Psychol., 44, 83–91

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mellstrom, M., Zuckerman, M. and Cicala, G. A. (1978). General versus specific tests in the assessment of anxiety. J. Consulting Clin. Psychol., 46, 423–31

    Google Scholar 

  52. Laux, L., Glanzmann, P. and Schaffner, P. (1985). General vs. situation-specific traits as related to anxiety in ego-threatening situations. In Spielberger, C. D., Sarason, I. G. and Defares, P. B. (eds.) Stress and Anxiety. Vol. 9, pp. 121–8. ( Washington, DC: Hemisphere )

    Google Scholar 

  53. Cooper, C. (1981). The utility of a general anxiety trait: some methodological considerations. Br. J. Soc. Psychol., 20, 135–9

    Google Scholar 

  54. Furnham, A. and Jaspars, J. (1983). The evidence for interactionism in psychology: a critical analysis of the situation-response inventories. Pers. Individ. Differences, 4, 627–44

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yerkes, R. M. and Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J. Comp. Neurol. Psychol., 18, 459–82

    Google Scholar 

  56. Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychol. Rev., 66, 183–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Eysenck, M. W. (1982). Attention and Arousal: Cognition and Performance. ( Berlin: Springer-Verlag )

    Google Scholar 

  58. Fröhlich, W. D. (1983). Perspektiven der Angstforschung. In Thomae, H. (ed.) Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Serie Motivation and Emotion. Vol. 2, pp. 110–320. ( Göttingen: Hogrefe )

    Google Scholar 

  59. Carpenter, P. A. and Just, M. A. (1975). Sentence comprehension: a psycholinguistic pro-cessing model of verification. Psychol. Rev., 82, 45–73

    Google Scholar 

  60. Shoben, E. J. (1978). Choosing a model of sentence-picture comparisons: a reply to Catlin and Jones. Psychol. Rev., 85, 131–7

    Google Scholar 

  61. Head, L. Q. and Lindsey, J. D. (1983). The effects of trait anxiety and test difficulty on undergraduates’ state anxiety. J. Psychol., 113, 289–93

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Tennyson, R. D. and Wooley, F. R. (1971). Interaction of anxiety with performance on two levels of task difficulty. J. Educ. Psychol., 62, 463–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Saltz, E. (1970). Manifest anxiety: have we misread the data? Psychol. Rev., 77, 568–73

    Google Scholar 

  64. Weiner, B. (1966). Role of success and failure in the learning of easy and complex tasks. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 3, 339–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Weiner, B. (1972). Theories of Motivation. ( Chicago: Markham )

    Google Scholar 

  66. Eriksen, C. W. (1954). Some personality correlates of stimulus generalization under stress. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 49, 561–5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Eriksen, C. W. and Davids, A. (1955). The meaning and clinical validity of the Taylor Anxiety Scale and the hysteria-psychasthenia scales from the MMPI. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 50, 135–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Eriksen, C. W. (1966). Cognitive responses to internally cued anxiety. In Spielberger, C. D. (ed.) Anxiety and Behavior. pp. 327–60. ( New York: Academic Press )

    Google Scholar 

  69. Krohne, H. W. (1980). Angsttheorie: Vom mechanistischen zum kognitiven Ansatz. Psychol. Rundschau, 31, 12–29

    Google Scholar 

  70. Krohne, H. W. and Rogner, J. (1982). Repression-sensitization as a central construct in coping research. In Krohne, H. W. and Laux, L. (eds.) Achievement, Stress, and Anxiety. pp. 167–93. ( Washington, DC: Hemisphere )

    Google Scholar 

  71. Houston, B. K. (1982). Trait anxiety and cognitive coping behavior. In Krohne, H. W. and Laux, L. (eds.) Achievement, Stress, and Anxiety. pp. 195–206. ( Washington, DC: Hemisphere )

    Google Scholar 

  72. Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. ( New York: McGraw-Hill )

    Google Scholar 

  73. Lazarus, R. S. and Launier, R. (1978). Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In Pervin, L. A. and Lewis, M. (eds.) Perspectives in Interactional Psychology. pp. 287–327. ( New York: Plenum )

    Google Scholar 

  74. Folkman, S., Schaefer, C. and Lazarus, R. S. (1979). Cognitive processes as mediators of stress and coping. In Hamilton, V. and Warburton, D. M. (eds.) Human Stress and Cognition: An Information-processing Approach. pp. 265–98. ( Chichester: John Wiley & Sons )

    Google Scholar 

  75. Grzegolowska-Klarkowska, H. J. (1980). Use of defense mechanisms as determined by reactivity and situational level of activation. Polish Psychol. Bull., 11, 155–68

    Google Scholar 

  76. Morris, L. W. and Engle, W. B. (1981). Assessing various coping strategies and their effects on test performance and anxiety. J. Clin. Psychol., 37, 165–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Lucas, J. D. (1952). The interactive effects of anxiety, failure, and intraserial duplication. Am. J. Psychol., 65, 59–66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. McGrath, J. E. (1982). Methodological problems in stress research. In Krohne, H. W. and Laux, L. (eds.) Achievement, Stress and Anxiety. pp. 19–48. ( Washington, DC: Hemisphere )

    Google Scholar 

  79. Boucsein, W., Erdmann, G., Janke, W. and Albrecht, D. (1982). Die Erfassung der indi- viduellen Reaktionsbereitschaft auf verschiedene Klassen von Stressoren. I Konstruktion, Aufgabenanalyse und Normierung des Belastungsfragebogens BELA. Z. Differentielle Diagnostische Psychol., 3, 185–200

    Google Scholar 

  80. Rohrbaugh, J. W., Syndulko, K. and Lindsley, D. B. (1976). Brain wave components of the contingent negative variation in humans. Science, 191, 1055–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Hodges, W. F. (1976). The psychophysiology of anxiety. In Zuckerman, M. and Spielberger, C. D. (eds.) Emotions and Anxiety: New Concepts, Methods, and Applications. pp. 175–94. ( Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum )

    Google Scholar 

  82. Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C. and Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: an electric sign of sensori-motor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203, 380–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Glanzmann, P. and Froehlich, W. D. (1984). Anxiety, stress, and contingent negative varia¬tion reconsidered. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 425, 578–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Low, M. D. and Swift, S. J. (1971). The contingent negative variation and the ‘resting’ D. C. potential of the human brain: effects of situational anxiety. Neuropsychologia, 9, 179–85

    Google Scholar 

  85. McCallum, W. C. and Papakostopoulos, D. (1973). The CNV and reaction time in situations of increasing complexity. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl., 33, 179–85

    Google Scholar 

  86. Knott, J. R., Van Veen, W. J., Miller, L. H., Peters, J. F. and Cohen, S. I. (1973). Perceptual mode, anxiety, sex, and the contingent negative variation. Biol. Psychiatry, 7, 43–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Proulx, G. S. and Picton, T. W. (1984). The effects of anxiety and expectancy on the CNV. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 425, 617–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Van Veen, W. J., Peters, J. F., Knott, J. R., Miller, L. H. and Cohen, S. I. (1973). Temporal characteristics of the contingent negative variation: relationships with anxiety, perceptual mode, sex, and stress. Biol. Psychiatry, 7, 101–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Knott, J. R. and Irwin, D. A. (1973). Anxiety, stress, and the contingent negative variation. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 29, 538–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Rizzo, P. A., Caporali, M., Pierelli, F., Spadaro, M., Zanasi, M., Morocutti, C. and Albani, G. (1984). Pain influence on brain preparatory sets. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 425, 676–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Tecce, J. J. (1972). Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological processes in man. Psychol. Bull., 77, 73–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Tecce, J.J. and Cole, J. O. (1976). The distraction-arousal hypothesis, CNV, and schizo-phrenia. In Mostofsky, D. I. (ed.) Behavior Control and Modification of Physiological Activity. pp. 162–219. ( Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall )

    Google Scholar 

  93. Heinrich, D. L. and Spielberger, C. D. (1982). Anxiety and complex learning. In Krohne, H. W. and Laux, L. (eds.) Achievement, Stress, and Anxiety. pp. 145–65. ( Washington, DC: Hemisphere )

    Google Scholar 

  94. Shearer, E. and Fulkerson, F. E. (1973). The effects of physical and psychological stress on the performance of high- and low-anxious Ss on a difficult verbal discrimination task. Bull. Psychonomic Soc., 1, 255–6

    Google Scholar 

  95. Reeves, R. A. and May, W. M. (1977). Effects of state-trait anxiety and task difficulty on paired associate learning. Psychol. Rep., 41, 179–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Anson, O., Bernstein, J. and Hobfoll, S. E. (1984). Anxiety and performance in two ego threatening situations. J. Pers. Assess., 48, 168–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Eysenck, M. W. (1979). Anxiety, learning, and memory: a reconceptualization. J. Res. Pers., 13, 363–85

    Google Scholar 

  98. Laux, L. and Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Stress, trait-state anxiety, and learning: two competing models. In Spielberger, C. D. and Diaz-Guerrero, R. (eds.) Cross-cultural Anxiety. Vol. 2, pp. 145–54. ( Washington, DC: Hemisphere )

    Google Scholar 

  99. Dunn, J. A. (1968). Anxiety, stress, and the performance of complex intellectual tasks: a new look at an old question. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 32, 669–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Humphreys, M. S. and Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, motivation, and performance: a theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychol. Rev., 91, 153–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Krohne, H, W. (1985). Das Konzept der Angstbewältigung. In Krohne, H. W. (ed.) Angstbewältigung in Leistungssituationen. pp. 1–13. (Weinheim: edition psychologie)

    Google Scholar 

  102. Schönpflug, W. (1985). Anxiety, worry, prospective orientation, and prevention. In Spielberger, C. D. and Sarason, I. G. (eds.) Stress and Anxiety. Vol. 12, in press. (Washington, DC: Hemisphere)

    Google Scholar 

  103. Morris, L. W., Franklin, M. S. and Ponath, P. (1983). The relationship between trait and state indices of worry and emotionality. In van der Ploeg, H. M., Schwarzer, R. and Spielberger, C. D. (eds.) Advances in Test Anxiety Research. Vol. 2, pp. 3–13. ( Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger SV )

    Google Scholar 

  104. Wieland, R. (1984). Temporal patterns of anxiety: towards a process analysis of anxiety and performance. In Schwarzer, R. (ed.) The Self in Anxiety, Stress, and Depression. pp. 133–50. ( Amsterdam: North Holland )

    Google Scholar 

  105. Otto, J. and Bosel, R. (1978). Angstverarbeitung und die Diskrepanz zwischen Selfreport und physiologischem Stressindikator: eine gelungene Replikation der Weinstein-Analyse. Schweiz. Z. Psychol, und ihre Anwendungen, 37, 321–30

    Google Scholar 

  106. Albert, D. (1980). Anxiety and learning-performance. Arch. Psychol., 132, 139–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 MTP Press Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glanzmann, P. (1985). Anxiety, stress and performance. In: Kirkcaldy, B.D. (eds) Individual Differences in Movement. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4912-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4912-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8676-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4912-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics