Skip to main content

Smoothness in Regression: Asymptotic Considerations

  • Chapter
Time Series and Econometric Modelling

Part of the book series: The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 36))

  • 648 Accesses

Abstract

Smoothness restrictions may be used in linear models, for instance, when the data set does not contain enough information to allow sufficiently accurate estimation of parameters. In this connection the problem of weighting the sample and non-sample information by a smoothing parameter arises. Suppose we want to choose the smoothing parameter in such a way that the mean squared prediction error (MSPE) of the model will be minimized. Starting from this assumption, an equation for the minimizer is derived, and its asymptotic solution is shown to be finite and unique. Next, it is proposed that common model selection criteria such as the AIC be generalized to be used for the estimation of the smoothing parameter. Asymptotically, several generalized criteria, called smoothing criteria in the paper, yield exactly the unique value which minimizes the MSPE. In fact, these are generalizations of the model selection criteria which are optimal according to the definition of Shibata (1981). Application of the above theoretical results to ridge regression is discussed. The effect of autocorrelated errors on the estimation of the smoothing parameter is also considered, and cases where autocorrelation may have little influence on the coefficient estimates of the model are indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akaike, H. (1969), “Fitting autoregressive models for prediction”. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 21, 243–247.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H. (1974), “A new look at the statistical model identification”. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-19, 716–723.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya T. (1980), “Selection of regressors”. International Economic Review 21, 331–354.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Craven, P., and G. Wahba (1979), “Smoothing noisy data with spline functions. Estimating the correct degree of smoothing by the method of generalized crossvalidation”. Numerische Mathematik 31, 377–403.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P., M. Schatzoff, and N. Wermuth (1977), “A simulation study of alternatives to ordinary least squares”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 72, 77–106 (with Discussion).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, N. R., and R. C. Van Nostrand (1979), “Ridge regression and James-Stein estimation: review and comments”. Technometrics 21, 451–466.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., C. W. J. Granger, J. Rice, and A. Weiss (1982), “Non-parametric estimates of the relation between weather and electricity demand”. Department of Economics, UCSD, Discussion Paper 83–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W. A. (1976), Introduction to Statistical Time Series. NNew York: Wiley and Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gersovitz, M., and J. G. MacKinnon (1978), “Seasonality in regression: an application of smoothness priors”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 73, 264–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geweke, J., and R. Meese (1981), “Estimating regression models of finite but unknown order”. International Economic Review 22, 55–70.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, D. G. (1981), “A simulation study of some ridge estimators”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76, 131–139.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Golub, G. H., M. Heath, and G. Wahba (1979), “Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter”. Technometrics 21, 215–223.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, E. J., and B. G. Quinn (1979), “The determination of the order of an autoregression”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 41, 190–195.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, R. R. (1976), “The analysis and selection of variables in linear regression”. Biometrics 32, 1–49.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, A. E., and R. W. Kennard (1970), “Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems”. Technometrics 12, 55–67.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, A. E., R. W. Kennard, and K. F. Baldwin (1975), “Ridge regression: some simulations”. Communications in Statistics 4, 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G. G., W. E. Griffiths, R. C. Hill, H. Lütkepohl, and T.-C. Lee (1985), The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd edition. NNew York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J. F., and P. Wang (1976), “A simulation of ridge and other regression estimators”. Communications in Statistics 5, 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallows, C. L. (1973), “Some comments on C P”. Technometrics 15, 661–675.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Oman, S. D. (1982), “Shrinking towards subspaces in multiple linear regression”. Technometiics 24, 307–311.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1973), Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, 2nd edition. NNew York: Wiley and Sons.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. (1984), “Bandwidth choice for nonparametric regression”. Annals of Statistics 12, 1215–1230.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sawa, T. (1978), “Information criteria for discriminating among alternative regression models”. Econometrica 46, 1273–1291.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G. (1978), “Estimating the dimension of a model”. Annals of Statistics 6, 461–464.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, R. (1981), “An optimal selection of regression variables”. Biometrika 68, 45–54.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. (1973), “A distributed lag estimator derived from smoothness priors”. Econometrica 41, 775–788.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. (1984), “Smoothness priors and nonlinear regression”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79, 609–615.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, P. A. V. B., and J. S. Mehta (1983), “Ridge regression estimation of the Rotterdam model”. Journal of Econometrics 22, 365–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, T. (1981), “A comparison of mixed and minimax estimators of linear models”. Communications in Statistics A, Theory and Methods 10, 1765–1778.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, T., and I. Mellin (1986), “Model selection criteria and model selection tests in regression models”. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1961), Economic Forecasts and Policy, 2nd edition. Amsterdam: North Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H., and A. S. Goldberger (1961), “On pure and mixed statistical estimation in economics”. International Economic Review 2, 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurman, S. S., P. A. V. B. Swamy, and J. S. Mehta (1984), “An examination of distributed lag model coefficients estimated with smoothness priors”. Federal Reserve Board, Washington, D. C., Special Studies Paper No. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi, P. K. (1984), “Uncertain prior information and distributed lag analysis”. In Econometrics and Quantitative Economics, ed. D. F. Hendry and K. F. Wallis, pp. 173–210. Oxford: Blackwells.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullah, A., and B. Raj (1979), “A distributed lag estimator derived from Shiller’s smoothness priors. An extension”. Economics Letters 2, 219–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahba, G. (1975), “Smoothing noisy data with spline functions”. Numerische Mathematik 24, 309–317.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Teräsvirta, T. (1987). Smoothness in Regression: Asymptotic Considerations. In: MacNeill, I.B., Umphrey, G.J., Carter, R.A.L., McLeod, A.I., Ullah, A. (eds) Time Series and Econometric Modelling. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4790-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4790-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8624-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4790-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics