Abstract
The science for which Kant aims to provide “metaphysical foundations” in the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (abbreviated as MAN)1 is Newtonian science: in particular, the science of Newton’s Principia (1686). This is indicated by the many explicit references to Newton and the Principia scattered throughout MAN, and, more importantly, by its content—which centrally involves both Newton’s Laws of Motion (especially in chapter 3: the Mechanics) and the theory of Universal Gravitation (especially in Propositions 5–8 and the General Observation to chapter 2: the Dynamics). Moreover, it is quite clear that Newton’s Principia serves as a model—perhaps the model—for scientific achievement during the whole of Kant’s long career: from the Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens (1755) to the unpublished Opus postumum (1796–1803). Thus, whether or not one wishes to extract philosophical morals from MAN that transcend the specific content of Newton’s Principia, there can be no doubt at all that this work is at least paradigmatic for Kant.
Ideas for this paper were developed initially in seminars presented at the University of Western Ontario, Spring 1984, under a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Visiting Foreign Scholars Fellowship. I am indebted to the questions, comments, and encouragement of Robert Butts, William Harper, and Kathleen Okruhlik. I am also indebted to helpful comments from Manley Thompson and Roberto Torretti on previous drafts. Further, although I have fundamental disagreements with his approach, I am indebted throughout to the writings of Gerd Buchdahl. I am most especially indebted, however, to the writings, suggestions, and criticisms of Howard Stein.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brittan, G. G., Jr. (1978). Kant’s Theory of Science. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Buchdahl, G. (1969). Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
—. (1974). ‘The conception of lawlikeness in Kant’s philosophy of science’, in Kant’s Theory of Knowledge, ed. L. W. Beck. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Reprinted from L. W. Beck ed., Proceedings of the Third International Kant Congress (1972). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.)
Ellington, J. (1970). Trans., Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Indianapolis/New York: Bobbs-Merrill. Reissued in Immanual Kant: Philosophy of Material Nature (1985). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Friedman, M. (1985). ‘Kant’s theory of geometry’. Philosophical Review 94: 455–506.
Harman, P. (1982). Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy. Brighton, England: Harvester Press.
Hastie, W. (1969). Trans., (Kant’s) Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens, ed. M. Munitz. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hoppe, H. (1969). Kants Theorie der Physik. Frankfort am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Kerferd, G. & Walford, D. (1968). Trans., Kant: Selected Pre-Critical Writings. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Kitcher, P. (1984). ‘Kant’s philosophy of science’. In A. Wood, ed., Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Koyré, A. (1952). ‘An unpublished letter of Robert Hooke to Isaac Newton’. Isis 43, pp. 312–337. Reprinted in A. Koyré, Newtonian Studies (1965). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Martin, G. (1951). Immanuel Kant, Ontologie und Wissenschaftstheorie. Cologne. Trans. P. Lucas, Kant’s Metaphysics and Theory of Science (1955). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
McMullin, E. (1978). Newton on Matter and Activity. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Newton, I. (1729). Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Trans. A. Motte, revised F. Cajori (1934). Berkeley: University of California Press.
—. (1730). Opticks (the 4th edition). London. (Reissued by G. Bell & Sons (1931), and by Dover Publications (1952)).
Okruhlik, K. (1983). ‘Kant on the foundations of science’. In Nature Mathematized (The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Vol. 20), ed. W. Shea. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Pages 251–268.
Palter, R. (1974). ‘Absolute space and absolute motion in Kant’s critical philosophy’, in Kant’s Theory of Knowledge, ed. L. W. Beck. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Reprinted from L. W. Beck ed., Proceedings of the Third International Kant Congress (1972). Dordrecht: D. Reidel).
Parsons, C. (1984). ‘Remarks on pure natural science’. In A. Wood, ed., Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Plaass, P. (1965). Kants Theorie der Naturwissenschaft. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Rupprecht.
Schäfer, L. (1966). Kants Metaphysik der Natur. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Smith, N. Kemp (1929). Trans, of Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. New York: Macmillan.
Stein, H. (1967). ‘Newtonian space-time’. Texas Quarterly 10: 174–200.
—. (1977). ‘Some philosophical prehistory of general relativity’, in J. Earman et al eds., Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VIII. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Tuschling, B. (1971). Metaphysische und transzendentale Dynamik in Kants Opus postumum. Berlin: de Gruyter.
—. (1973). ‘Kants’ Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft’ und das Opus postumum’. In G. Prauss, ed., Kant: Zur Deutung seiner Theorie von Erkennen und Handeln. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Friedman, M. (1986). The Metaphysical Foundations of Newtonian Science. In: Butts, R.E. (eds) Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Science. The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4730-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4730-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-2310-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4730-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive