Advertisement

Runoff Production and Flood Frequency in Catchments of Order n: An Alternative Approach

  • Keith Beven
Chapter
Part of the Water Science and Technology Library book series (WSTL, volume 6)

Abstract

A simple physically-based hydrological model is derived that takes account of the effect of spatial heterogeneities of topography and soil on runoff production. Both infiltration excess and saturation excess mechanisms of runoff production are simulated by the model. The model is computationally inexpensive and has been used to derive flood frequency characteristics for three small catchments by simulating hydrographs during a 100 year record of randomly generated rainstorms. Interstorm calculations are carried out analytically. For the range of parameter values studied it was found that all the maximum annual flood peak distributions are of extreme value 1 (Gumbel) type. The normalized distribution functions (growth curves) are remarkably similar over all the parameter sets considered. Runoff production in flood events for all the simulations was dominated by the saturation excess mechanism, even assuming very high hydraulic conductivities, and even where infiltration excess runoff is predicted as occurring over part of the catchment. It appears to be difficult to avoid surface saturation under the wet conditions associated with floods in a climatic regime typical of upland Britain.

Keywords

Hydraulic Conductivity Unsaturated Zone Flood Frequency Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Water Resource Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beven, K.J., 1979, On the generalised kinematic routing method, Water Resources Research, 15(5), 1238–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beven, K.J., 1983, Introducing spatial variability into TOPMODEL: theory and preliminary results. Report to Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
  3. Beven, K.J., 1984 Infiltration into a class of vertically non-uniform soils, Hydrological Sciences J., 29(4), in pressGoogle Scholar
  4. Beven, K.J., 1985, Towards the use of catchment geomorphology in flood frequency predictions, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, in press.Google Scholar
  5. Beven, K.J., 1986, Hillslope runoff processes and flood frequency characteristics, in A.D. Abrahams (ed.), Hillslope Processes, Goerge, Allen and Unwin, in press.Google Scholar
  6. Beven, K.J. and Germann, P.F., Macropores and Water Flow in Soils, Water Resources Research, 18(5), 1311–1325.Google Scholar
  7. Beven, K.J. and Kirkby, M.J., 1979, A physically-based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology, Hydrological Sciences Bull., 24(1), 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beven, K.J., Kirkby, M.J., Schoffield, N. and Tagg, A., 1984, Testing a physically-based flood forecasting model (TOPMODEL) for three UK catchments, J. Hydrology, 69, 119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beven, K.J. and Wood, E.F., 1983, Catchment geomorphology and the dynamics of runoff contributing areas, J. Hydrology, 65, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calder, I.R., Harding, R.J. and Rosier, P.T.W., 1983, An objective assessment of soil moisture deficit models, J. Hydrology, 60, 329–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cordova, J.R. and Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., 1983, Geomorphologic estimation of extreme flow probabilities, J. Hydrology, 65, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diaz-Granados, M.A., Valdés, J.B., and Bras, R.L., 1984, A physically-based flood frequency distribution, Water Resources Research, 20(7), 995–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunne, T., 1978, Field studies of Hillslope Flow Processes, in M. Kirkby, (Ed), Hillslope Hydrology, Wiley, Chichester, 227–294.Google Scholar
  14. Eagleson, P.S., 1972, Dynamics of flood frequency, Water Resources Research, 8(4), 878–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeze, R.A., 1972, Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff. 2 Upstream source areas, Water Resources Research, 8(5), 1272–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeze, R.A., 1980, A stochastic conceptual analysis of rainfall- runoff processes on a hillslope, Water Resources Research, 16(2), 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenkorn, R.A. and D.P. Kessler, 1969, Dispersion in heterogeneous nonuniform anisotropic porous media, Ind. Eng. Chcm., 61(9), 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hebson, C. and Wood, E.F., 1982, A derived flood frequency distribution, Water Resources Research, 18(5), 1509–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirkby, M.J., 1969, Infiltration, throughflow and overland flow in Chorley, R.J., (Ed.), Water, Earth and Man, Methuen, London, 215–227.Google Scholar
  20. Morel-Seytoux, H.J. and Khanji, J., 1974, Derivation of an equation of infiltration, Water Resources Research, 10, 795–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. NERC, 1975, Flood Studies Report (5 volumes) Natural Environment Research Council, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
  22. Rodríguez-Iturbe, I. and Valdés, J.B., 1979, The geomorphological structure of hydrologic response, Water Resources Research, 15(6), 1409–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., Gonzalez, M. and Bras, R.L., 1982, A geomorphoclimatic theory of the instantaneous unit hydrograph, Water Resources Research 18(4), 877–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Russo, D. and Bresler, E., 1982, Soil hydraulic properties as stochastic processes: II Errors of estimates in a heterogeneous field, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 46, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith, R.E. and Hebbert, R.H.B., 1979, A Monte Carlo analysis of the hydrologic effects of spatial variability of infiltration, Water Resources Research, 15(2), 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Surkan, A.J., 1969, Synthetic hydrographs: Effects of Network Geometry, Water Resources Research, 5, 112–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vieira, S.R., Nielsen, D.R. and Biggar, J.W., 1981, Spatial variability of field-measured infiltration rates, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 45, 1040–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith Beven

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations